When I sat down with Michael Harrington, an architect with over a decade of experience in sustainable building design, I expected an in-depth conversation about the complexities of modern architecture. What I got was a passionate plea for embracing Passivhaus standards as a viable alternative to the current energy performance targets under Standard 6.1. Harrington’s insights provide a compelling argument for why the time is ripe to consider Passivhaus certification as a mainstream approach in building regulations.
Successful low-energy building design hinges on careful planning. Focus360 Energy can help.
“Passivhaus is more than just a set of building standards; it’s a philosophy aimed at creating ultra-low energy buildings that provide high levels of comfort,” Harrington began, his enthusiasm palpable. “Traditional methodologies like SAP and SBEM are effective, but they often fall short when it comes to delivering the performance levels that modern, energy-conscious buildings require.”
Harrington explained that the Passivhaus standard is supported by the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP), a design and calculation tool that uses local climate data and includes unregulated energy for a comprehensive assessment of actual energy use. “The beauty of PHPP is that it’s designed to approximate real-world outcomes closely. This is crucial for making informed decisions from the early design stages,” he noted.
One of the most compelling aspects of the Passivhaus approach is its use of absolute targets. Unlike the relative targets set by current building regulations, which vary depending on the building’s type and form, Passivhaus sets an absolute target for space heating demand—15 kWh/m²/yr—and overall Primary Energy Renewable demand—60 kWh/m²/yr. “Absolute targets are a game-changer,” Harrington asserted. “They compel architects and builders to consider all aspects of a building’s design, from orientation and form factor to fabric specification and the proportion and positioning of openings.”
Harrington highlighted that the focus on absolute targets encourages the delivery of buildings with uncomplicated, energy-efficient forms. “It’s about creating a consistent level of performance across all buildings, regardless of their design specifics. This is a strong driver for achieving energy efficiency in a way that relative targets simply can’t match,” he said.
Another critical element of the Passivhaus standard is its rigorous approach to building envelope and insulation. Passivhaus requires the continuity of insulation across the envelope, limiting thermal bridging and ensuring airtight construction. “The standard sets a maximum limit for building fabric infiltration of 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 pascals pressure difference,” Harrington explained. “This is significantly more stringent than the values typically achieved under current building regulations.”
Harrington also pointed out the benefits of using mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) systems, a staple in Passivhaus buildings. “MVHR systems are incredibly effective at reducing heating demand while maintaining indoor air quality. They also help address issues like humidity and ventilation noise, contributing to overall occupant comfort,” he said.
Despite the numerous advantages, Harrington acknowledged that adopting Passivhaus standards would require a shift in mindset and practice. “It’s not just about meeting regulatory requirements; it’s about committing to a higher standard of building performance and occupant comfort,” he said. “But the benefits far outweigh the challenges. Passivhaus buildings are not only more energy-efficient but also more comfortable and healthier for their occupants.”
Harrington’s passionate advocacy for Passivhaus is rooted in his own professional experience. “I’ve worked on several Passivhaus projects, and the feedback from clients has been overwhelmingly positive. They appreciate the lower energy bills, the consistent indoor temperatures, and the improved air quality,” he shared.
As our conversation drew to a close, Harrington made a compelling case for why the consultation on proposed changes to building regulations should seriously consider Passivhaus certification as an alternative to the current target-setting process. “We have an opportunity to redefine building standards in a way that prioritises energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. Passivhaus offers a proven, effective pathway to achieving these goals,” he concluded.
In a world increasingly aware of the need for sustainable living, Harrington’s insights offer a glimpse into a future where buildings are not just structures but harmoniously integrated systems designed for optimal performance and occupant well-being. As the consultation process unfolds, his perspective serves as a timely reminder of the potential benefits of embracing Passivhaus standards in our quest for a more sustainable built environment.
Emily Thompson
Be the first to comment