As the Government aims to facilitate the construction of 1.5 million new homes, the forthcoming modifications to England’s planning system have emerged as a crucial subject of discussion. I recently engaged in a conversation with Hannah Thompson, a Senior Urban Planner at a leading planning consultancy, who offered valuable perspectives on the anticipated reforms. Our dialogue illuminated the potential ramifications and the driving forces behind these comprehensive changes.
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
“The magnitude of these reforms is unprecedented,” Hannah began, her enthusiasm tempered with a cautious note. “The Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, Angela Rayner, is slated to present a thorough overhaul of the planning system to MPs. This initiative is not merely about augmenting housing numbers but fundamentally transforming our developmental approach.”
Hannah elucidated that a pivotal aspect of the announcement is the reinstatement of obligatory housing targets. “Under the previous administration, these targets were more flexible, often resulting in delays and inconsistent application across regions. Reintroducing mandatory targets provides local authorities with clear, quantifiable objectives, which should, in theory, streamline the process.”
Yet, the most contentious element of the reform is the utilisation of the so-called “grey belt” for development. This includes low-quality areas such as disused car parks and wasteland within the protected green belt. “The Government maintains that conserving nature remains a priority,” Hannah observed. “However, they argue that developing these underutilised grey areas can be achieved without undermining broader environmental goals.”
Hannah also highlighted the introduction of “golden rules” designed to ensure that development benefits local communities and safeguards the environment. “These golden rules aim to provide a balanced approach, ensuring that new developments are not solely about meeting housing targets but also about creating sustainable, liveable communities.”
Significant changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) are also on the horizon. “The existing NPPF was introduced under the Conservative government and included a requirement for new homes to be ‘beautiful.’ Critics found this too vague and subjective. Labour plans to replace this with a focus on ‘exemplary’ development, which they argue is a more practical and measurable standard.”
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s position on planning policy is unequivocal: the Government supports “builders not blockers.” This approach is deemed essential for economic growth. “Expediting development is critical,” Hannah stated. “Consulting on ‘how, not if’ projects should proceed reflects a proactive stance. It’s about facilitating development rather than imposing barriers.”
One of the more controversial proposals is the reform of compulsory purchase compensation rules. “Under the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, the Government intends to enable land to be acquired more affordably for construction purposes. Owners compelled to sell their land would receive ‘fair but not excessive’ compensation. This aims to reduce costs and accelerate land acquisition for significant developments.”
The opposition’s reaction has been mixed. “The Conservatives have expressed concerns that these plans could diminish local authorities’ power,” Hannah explained. “They’ve also accused Labour of downplaying the reforms’ extent, labelling references to the ‘grey belt’ as mere spin. It’s a complex issue, and there are valid arguments on both sides.”
As our discussion concluded, Hannah reflected on the broader implications of these changes. “If implemented effectively, these reforms could substantially increase the housing supply and address some of the chronic shortages we’ve been facing. However, the success of these measures will depend on meticulous planning, robust oversight, and genuine engagement with local communities.”
The anticipated announcement by Angela Rayner signifies a pivotal moment in the Government’s housing strategy. As the details emerge, it will be intriguing to observe how these extensive changes will shape the future of housing development in England. For planners like Hannah Thompson, it represents both a challenge and an opportunity to create sustainable, thriving communities for future generations.
Be the first to comment