In the bustling realm of urban planning, where the blueprints for our future cities are meticulously crafted, the call for strategic planning reforms has never been more pronounced. Recently, I had the privilege of conversing with Thomas Bradley, a veteran urban planner with over two decades of experience. His insights illuminated the pressing need for strategic planning reforms, a necessity underscored by recent research from the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI).
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
Thomas welcomed me warmly, his enthusiasm for his work palpable. “The RTPI’s recent study is a significant milestone,” he began, his voice brimming with conviction. “It echoes what many of us in the field have been advocating for years.” The study in question revealed a striking consensus: over 95% of planners agree that strategic planning reforms are essential. For Thomas, this statistic was not a revelation but a validation of long-held observations within the profession.
“Since the abolition of statutory strategic planning in 2010, we’ve been navigating a fragmented system,” Thomas explained. “Without a mandatory framework, planning has become inconsistent, often leaving gaps that hinder cohesive development.” This sentiment is corroborated by further research from the Centre for Sustainable Planning and Environments, which indicates that 80% of planners believe strategic planning should be government-mandated. Thomas concurred, emphasising the critical nature of strategic planning. “It’s not just about drawing up plans; it’s about creating a vision for communities, ensuring that development is sustainable and beneficial for everyone.”
Our discussion shifted towards the practical implications of the absence of statutory strategic planning. “In England, since 2010, many areas have been left without any compulsory strategic planning requirements,” Thomas noted. “This has led to a situation where 40% of local authority planners don’t work in areas with statutory strategic planning, and 25% report no non-statutory strategic planning activity at all.” These statistics paint a concerning picture. “Imagine trying to build a house without a blueprint,” Thomas said, leaning forward for emphasis. “That’s what it feels like. Without a strategic plan, we miss the bigger picture, affecting everything—from housing to infrastructure and environmental sustainability.”
Thomas shared personal anecdotes to illustrate his point. He recalled a project in a small town where the absence of a strategic plan created numerous roadblocks. “We were trying to implement a new housing development, but without a strategic plan, different stakeholders had conflicting interests, and there was no overarching framework to guide us. It was like trying to piece together a puzzle without knowing what the final picture should look like.” These challenges underscore the necessity for a cohesive strategic framework to guide urban development effectively.
As our conversation deepened, Thomas highlighted the role of the RTPI and other researchers in advocating for these reforms. He mentioned Victoria Hills, the chief executive of RTPI, whose words resonated with him. “Victoria said it’s rewarding to see members producing high-quality research at a time when the government is looking to change the system through the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). It’s a positive step.” Catriona Riddell, another prominent figure in the planning community, also received a nod from Thomas. “Catriona has been a strong advocate for effective strategic planning since 2010. Her insights are invaluable, especially as the government moves forward with its proposals.”
However, it was Hannah Hickman’s contribution that Thomas found particularly compelling. “Hannah led the research for the RTPI and gathered evidence from over 400 participants. The findings are clear—there’s a compelling case for a return to a more effective, mandatory form of statutory strategic planning.” Thomas’s passion for the subject was evident as he articulated the broader implications. “We need to look at planning as a holistic process. It’s not just about individual projects but about creating a framework that allows for sustainable growth and development. Strategic planning reforms are not just necessary; they are vital for the future of our communities.”
As our conversation concluded, Thomas left me with a hopeful note. “The consensus among planners is strong, and we have the research to back it up. Now, it’s about translating that into action. We need the government to listen and implement these much-needed reforms.” Walking away from the interview, the importance of strategic planning in shaping our cities and communities became strikingly clear. The overwhelming agreement among planners, as highlighted by the RTPI’s research, underscores a critical need that cannot be ignored.
For urban planners like Thomas Bradley, the call for strategic planning reforms transcends professional necessity; it is a mission to forge better, more sustainable futures for us all.
Be the first to comment