In a recent interview, procurement specialist Olivia Harris shared her expertise on the complexities and challenges inherent in public sector construction. As a Senior Project Manager at Southern Construction Framework, Harris illuminated the pitfalls of single-stage procurement models in public projects. Advocating for two-stage procurement, she argued that this approach offers a more balanced and secure framework, particularly in preserving the original design intent and maintaining safety and quality standards.
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
As a journalist specialising in construction and procurement, I had the opportunity to delve into Harris’s vast experience. What follows is a detailed account of our enlightening conversation.
“Single-stage procurement is often perceived as a quick fix,” Harris remarked, setting the tone for our discussion. “However, it can lead to a myriad of issues.” She pinpointed the inflexibility of single-stage procurement as its fundamental flaw. “When budgets and outcomes are predetermined, there is minimal room for adjustment. This rigidity often compels contractors to resort to lower-quality materials to adhere to budget constraints, thus compromising the integrity and safety of the construction.”
Adam Sanford, Operations Lead at Southern Construction Framework, has frequently voiced concerns regarding these challenges. In his contributions to the Chartered Institute of Building, he underscores the necessity of accurate initial budgeting. “The Building Safety Act places heightened responsibilities on designers to ensure regulatory compliance,” Sanford asserts. Harris echoed this sentiment, emphasising that precise budgeting has become more crucial than ever, particularly in light of stringent safety standards.
Harris elaborated further on the drawbacks of single-stage procurement, noting its propensity to compromise quality and safety by necessitating the use of subpar materials. This concern is especially pronounced in public sector projects, where the stakes are considerably high. “We must adopt a long-term perspective,” she urged. “Cutting corners now can lead to severe repercussions in the future.”
The solution, according to Harris, lies in two-stage procurement. “This model fosters open communication and mitigates the adverse effects of competitive tension on material and specification decisions,” she explained. A two-stage procurement process ensures greater transparency and collaboration among all parties involved. “It facilitates early engagement with the supply chain, which is crucial for identifying and mitigating risks in both design and cost planning.”
Harris cited the University of Hertfordshire’s Spectra building as a quintessential example of successful two-stage procurement. Emma Curtis, Area Director at Morgan Sindall, managed the project and reported considerable advantages. “The two-stage process allowed us to involve our supply chain from the outset,” Curtis noted. “This enabled us to source materials with the necessary fire rating certification and effectively coordinate with fire consultants and building control officers.”
Harris stressed that two-stage procurement is not solely about risk mitigation; it is also about ensuring quality. “During the pre-construction phase in a two-stage procurement, all potential risks are identified,” she said. “This empowers clients to make well-informed decisions that prioritise quality.” By involving all stakeholders from the beginning, the two-stage model ensures aligned goals and expectations.
“One of the most significant benefits of two-stage procurement is that it facilitates superior decision-making,” Harris observed. “Having all the information upfront allows for choices that are in the best interest of the project, rather than being constrained by budget limitations.” This comprehensive approach not only enhances build quality but also improves safety—a paramount concern in public sector projects.
As our conversation concluded, Harris encapsulated her views on the future of procurement in the public sector. “We must abandon the notion that cheaper is better,” she asserted. “Quality and safety should never be sacrificed for budgetary reasons. Two-stage procurement offers a more sustainable and secure approach, ensuring that public sector construction projects meet the highest standards.”
My discussion with Olivia Harris offered a profound insight into the advantages of two-stage procurement. Her perspectives were not only informative but also underscored the pressing need for a paradigm shift in managing public sector construction projects. As the industry continues to evolve, it is evident that two-stage procurement could play a pivotal role in safeguarding the quality and safety of our public buildings.
Be the first to comment