When I had the opportunity to sit down with Richard Harris, an urban planner boasting over two decades of experience, it quickly became apparent that his passion for the future of our urban landscapes is unwavering. Recently, Richard played a pivotal role in a comprehensive study underwritten by three prominent UK developers: British Land, Landsec, and Berkeley Group. The objective of this research was to gauge community sentiments towards brownfield development across four significant urban locales: Cambridge, Camden, Manchester, and Newham.
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
As Richard divulged the findings, it was clear that the results had not only surprised him but had also revitalised his confidence in the immense potential of urban regeneration. “The results were overwhelmingly positive,” he remarked, reclining in his chair. “Nearly 80% of those surveyed supported brownfield development. It’s a significant indication that people are eager for change.”
The study revealed that an impressive 75% of respondents advocated for prioritising brownfield regeneration over other types of development. Richard elaborated that this sentiment was consistently shared across all demographics and locations surveyed. “Whether in Camden or Newham, the majority of people viewed brownfield sites as opportunities rather than eyesores.”
The term “brownfield” refers to previously developed land that is currently not in use and may be potentially contaminated. These sites often conjure images of derelict buildings and neglected spaces. “60% of those polled had ‘strongly negative’ views of these underdeveloped sites,” Richard pointed out. “They’re seen as ugly, dirty, and unsafe. Yet, what is exciting is that over 70% of respondents recognised the potential of these areas. They see them as wasted opportunities that need to be harnessed.”
One of the more intriguing facets of the research was the community’s willingness to support taller or denser developments if they resulted in greater benefits for the area. “People are open to change,” Richard noted. “But they want to see tangible benefits like affordable housing, public spaces, and green areas.”
Richard emphasised that the positive outlook on brownfield development transcended mere aesthetics, encompassing social and economic benefits as well. “Affordable housing is a significant concern for many urban communities. Brownfield sites offer a unique opportunity to address this issue without encroaching on green spaces.”
The research extended beyond gauging public opinion; it also pinpointed actionable steps that developers and the government could take to make brownfield development a reality. The three developers involved in the study are urging the government to prioritise such projects and bolster the financial capacity of housing associations. “We need more efficient grant funding and better infrastructure delivery mechanisms,” Richard asserted.
Another contentious issue was the choice between Section 106 agreements and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Richard explained, “Section 106 agreements allow for locally negotiated benefits on large brownfield projects. This flexibility can significantly impact how quickly and effectively these projects are delivered.”
Camden, one of the four areas included in the study, was particularly noteworthy. Richard shared some insights specific to this borough. “Camden has a mix of old industrial sites and underutilised land that could be transformed into vibrant communities. The local council has been proactive in exploring ways to regenerate these areas, and the community’s positive response further bolsters these efforts.”
He continued, “The people in Camden are particularly keen on seeing more affordable housing and green spaces. It’s a diverse area with a lot of young families and professionals who are looking for sustainable living options.”
As our discussion drew to a close, Richard’s optimism was infectious. “This research is a game-changer,” he remarked. “It shows that urban communities are not only ready but eager for brownfield development. They understand the potential benefits and are willing to support projects that improve their quality of life.”
The findings from this study serve as a clarion call for developers and policymakers alike. By prioritising brownfield sites, we can rejuvenate neglected areas, creating sustainable, affordable, and vibrant communities. As Richard stood up to leave, he added, “The real work begins now. We have the community’s backing; it’s time to turn these opportunities into realities.”
Be the first to comment