In the world of sustainable building practices, certifications like BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) play a pivotal role in ensuring that structures are constructed with environmental considerations at the forefront. Recently, I had the opportunity to sit down with Emily Harper, an experienced BREEAM assessor, to discuss her insights into the nuances of the BREEAM New Construction assessment, specifically focusing on shell only projects.
Discover how Focus360 Energy can help with BREEAM certification.
Emily, who has been working with BREEAM assessments for over a decade, began by explaining the concept of a shell only assessment in the BREEAM New Construction scheme. “Essentially,” she said, “a shell only project is one where the primary structure, or the ‘shell’, is completed, but the interior fit-out is left for future development. This is particularly common in commercial properties where flexibility for the end-user is a priority.”
As Emily elaborated, the shell only assessment aligns closely with Part 1 of the BREEAM Refurbishment and Fit-out (RFO) scheme. “The primary objective here,” she noted, “is to achieve a certificate for the original design. This certificate acknowledges the sustainability of the building’s fundamental structure, before any interior design elements are considered.”
One of the critical aspects Emily highlighted was the decision by BREEAM to drop the notion of providing ‘fully-fitted’ ratings following a shell or shell and core certificate. “Previously, there was an idea to link these assessments, but it proved too complex,” she said. “The demand wasn’t there, and the challenge of mapping criteria from one stage to another was significant. Now, we conduct two separate assessments for projects with distinct construction phases.”
Understanding the rationale behind this shift is crucial. Emily explained that having separate certificates for the shell and the subsequent fit-out stages allows for a more comprehensive reflection of a building’s sustainability. “Each phase has unique challenges and criteria,” she said. “By separating them, we can ensure that both stages are assessed accurately and fairly.”
This change, Emily added, will be updated in the next reissue of the technical manual, making it a permanent fixture in BREEAM’s approach. “It’s about clarity and ensuring that every project gets the most accurate sustainability rating possible.”
Emily went on to describe how a shell only BREEAM New Construction assessment fits into the broader picture. “It’s like setting the stage,” she said. “You establish the foundation with the shell, ensuring it’s sustainable and efficient. Then, when you move to the fit-out phase, you have a solid base to build upon.”
Regarding the practical implications for developers and builders, Emily mentioned that this approach requires a bit more planning and coordination. “You need to think ahead,” she advised. “Knowing that you’ll need a separate assessment for the fit-out means considering those criteria from the start.”
Emily’s insights shed light on the intricacies of BREEAM assessments and the importance of understanding each project’s unique phases. “It’s not just about getting a certificate,” she emphasised. “It’s about genuinely building sustainably, every step of the way.”
For those working in construction or development, Emily’s advice is invaluable. “Stay informed,” she suggested. “The landscape of sustainable building is always evolving, and keeping up with these changes is key to success.”
Our conversation with Emily Harper provided a clear, insightful look into the world of BREEAM assessments, particularly the shell only New Construction assessment. Her experience and expertise underscore the importance of adaptability and foresight in sustainable building practices, reminding us all of the vital role these certifications play in shaping our built environment for a better future.
Written by Marcia Snyder
Be the first to comment