Summary
The UK’s New Hospitals Programme, initially promising 40 new hospitals by 2030, has been revised with a more realistic timetable and funding plan. Delays mean some projects won’t begin construction until after 2030, extending completion well beyond the initial target. While the revised plan provides more certainty, concerns remain about rising costs and potential further delays.
Air quality is vital in planning. See how Focus360 Energy can assist.
Main Story
So, you’ve probably heard about the UK’s New Hospitals Programme, right? It was this massive undertaking launched back in 2019, promising a shiny 40 new hospitals by 2030. A real game changer, or so they said. But, it’s not quite working out as planned.
You see, the initial pledge from Boris Johnson, well, it seems it was a bit, shall we say, optimistic. The current administration has basically said it was unrealistic, and more to the point, underfunded. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has recently come out with a revised plan, acknowledging all the delays. He’s calling it a more ‘honest, realistic, and deliverable’ approach. Honestly, I’m not sure what to think, but he’s right about it being more realistic. That said, it means pushing completion dates way past 2030, which naturally, is raising a lot of eyebrows about the long-term impact on the NHS and, most importantly, patients.
There’s more to it than just a delay though, the original plan faced quite a bit of criticism, it turns out that some of the ‘new hospitals’ were just refurbishments or extensions. So, not actually new hospitals, which really misrepresents what’s going on, doesn’t it? Then, if that weren’t enough, it came out that there wasn’t enough funding to meet the 2030 deadline. Projections showed they’d run out of resources by March 2025! Even the Infrastructure Projects Authority (IPA) called the whole thing “unachievable” in their report, citing big issues with scheduling and the budget. It’s a bit of a mess, to be frank.
The new plan uses a phased approach, breaking the projects down into five-year ‘waves’ of investment. HM Treasury is now committing up to £15 billion per wave, about £3 billion annually from 2030 onwards. This, they hope, will offer better financial stability. Still, the extended timeframe raises questions about the potential for cost increases due to inflation, you know how it goes.
They haven’t cancelled any projects, which is something, but the new schedule seriously affects the delivery dates. The top priority is seven hospitals built with RAAC – that’s reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete, a material that, let’s be honest, has a limited lifespan, and is frankly a bit worrying for safety. These projects are getting addressed first, focusing on the high-risk bits to keep patients and staff safe, quite rightly.
The remaining projects have been allocated to different ‘waves’ with staggered start dates. Some might start in 2025 or 2026, but others, unfortunately, face delays until 2039 or even later, can you imagine? This naturally has caused disappointment among NHS staff, leaders, and patients who were eager for better facilities. I heard a story from a nurse friend the other day, they were so excited about the possibility of a new ward. It’s a real shame.
While the revised schedule is more transparent and offers a realistic assessment of the program, it highlights the impact of years of underfunding in NHS infrastructure. They are saying they are still committed to rebuilding the NHS and tackling the maintenance and repair backlog caused by those funding issues. We’ll see how that goes.
There are also larger issues at play here, the New Hospitals Programme shines a light on broader challenges with UK building regulations and the construction industry in general. For instance, the Building Safety Act 2022 which was rolled out between October 2023 and April 2024, has brought in significant changes, especially for high-rise buildings. This is largely down to the Grenfell Tower tragedy, so it’s understandable there’s a renewed focus on safety and accountability.
The revised timetable also coincides with changes to building control regulations, including a revised definition of “commencement” of building work. Building control approval now lapses automatically after three years if work hasn’t started. Also, projects submitted before June 15, 2022, but not started by June 15, 2023, might need updates to meet current building regulations – stricter standards for insulation, ventilation and electric vehicle charging, and that sort of thing.
All this shows just how complex these massive construction projects can be. The revised timetable acknowledges the delays, but it also seeks a more sustainable, transparent path forward. It’s a challenging situation but at the end of the day, it’s about delivering the healthcare infrastructure the country desperately needs. Continued scrutiny and effective management will be key if they want to stay on track. It does make you wonder, doesn’t it, if all this could have been avoided with more realistic planning from the get-go?
The phased approach, breaking projects into waves, seems a sensible strategy for managing such a complex, long-term undertaking. This allows for better financial oversight and perhaps reduces the risk of complete project failure.
I agree that the phased approach seems much more manageable. Breaking it into waves should also allow for lessons to be learned and applied to subsequent phases. It will be interesting to see how this impacts cost efficiency and overall timelines. Hopefully, we’ll see better results this time around.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
So, “shiny” new hospitals turned out to be mostly extensions and refurbishments? Classic bait and switch, eh? I’m sure that was only to meet their initial targets and in no way a deceptive practice.
It’s certainly concerning how the initial plans were presented. The discussion around ‘new hospitals’ versus extensions and refurbishments highlights the need for clear and transparent communication. Hopefully, the phased approach will offer better project visibility.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The revised plan’s focus on RAAC hospitals as a priority is understandable given the safety concerns. It’s vital to address these risks first before moving onto other projects.
I completely agree. Prioritizing RAAC hospitals is absolutely essential for safety. The phased approach allows for a focused effort on these critical projects before moving onto the others. Addressing the high-risk areas first will hopefully ensure a more secure and effective overall delivery.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The extended timeline does raise concerns about how evolving building regulations might further impact project delivery and costs. It would be useful to understand how these are being factored into the phased approach.
That’s a really insightful point. Considering how building regulations are constantly evolving, it’s crucial to understand how these changes will be incorporated into each phase of the program. Clear planning and adaptability will be essential to avoid potential delays and unexpected costs down the line.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The mention of building control approvals lapsing after three years highlights potential challenges for long-term phased projects and the need for meticulous planning to maintain compliance.
You’ve highlighted a critical point regarding building control approvals. It really underscores how each phase needs careful consideration from the outset, particularly with a long-term project like this. The phased approach has benefits, but it does mean each stage needs to be approached with this in mind.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The updated plan’s focus on waves of investment introduces a more controlled financial model. It will be important to see how these staggered investments will mitigate against market fluctuations and ensure project continuity.
That’s a great point about the staggered investments potentially mitigating market fluctuations. It will be interesting to observe how this model adapts to evolving economic conditions over the multi-year program and how that impacts the timelines.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
“A phased approach to project delays – innovative! I’m sure those waiting for new facilities will be thrilled about the “realistic” 2039 start date.”