In a world where society’s demands on the construction industry continuously evolve, the regulatory landscape must keep pace with innovation, safety, and performance. Recently, I had the opportunity to sit down with Sarah Mitchell, a leading researcher at the forefront of construction product regulations, to discuss the challenges and the pivotal role that robust research and education play in addressing these issues.
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
Sarah is no stranger to the complexities of construction regulations. With a background in civil engineering and a keen interest in sustainable building practices, she brings a wealth of experience to her role as an advisor on regulatory reform. As we began our conversation, it became clear that her insights were not only informed by her academic prowess but also by her hands-on experience with industry challenges.
“One of the major hurdles we face,” Sarah began, “is the sheer complexity of the regulatory framework. Construction product regulations don’t exist in isolation; they’re an integral part of a wider system that includes building regulations, technical specifications, and standards. This web of regulations is further complicated by national laws like the Building Safety Act in the UK.”
The intersection of innovation and regulation is a particular area of concern. As new technologies like modular construction, 3D printing, and smart materials enter the market, regulatory frameworks must evolve to ensure these innovations are implemented safely and effectively. Sarah pointed out that traditional testing methods struggle to keep up with the dynamic nature of these new materials.
“We’re seeing a shift towards performance-based building regulations, which are more flexible to encourage innovation,” she explained. “However, this flexibility can lead to varied interpretations, making compliance more complex. That’s where robust research comes in—by developing new testing and regulatory approaches, we can ensure that safety and performance standards are met.”
Safety, contrary to popular belief, hasn’t always been the primary focus of construction product regulations. In the EU and UK, frameworks like the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) were initially designed to facilitate trade, leaving safety and performance requirements to individual countries. This has led to a fragmented regulatory environment where product safety relies on the interaction between various standards and regulations.
“The lifecycle safety of construction products is a growing concern,” Sarah noted. “Products like composite cladding may meet safety standards initially, but their performance can degrade over time. We need clearer roles and responsibilities, along with robust in-situ testing, to ensure long-term safety.”
Performance, too, is evolving to encompass not just traditional measures like durability and structural integrity but also environmental sustainability. The EU’s new CPR emphasises the need to evaluate products based on their environmental impact throughout their lifecycle. However, this poses both regulatory and design challenges, particularly when it comes to materials like recycled steel or reused concrete.
“How do we ensure that reused materials meet the same performance standards as new ones?” Sarah asked rhetorically. “This is where research and higher education play critical roles. We need to develop standards that ensure all materials perform safely and reliably, and we must prepare future professionals to navigate these sustainability challenges.”
Our conversation turned to the role of digital tools in market transparency. Technologies like Building Information Modeling (BIM) and digital product passports are becoming central to the industry, providing detailed records of compliance with sustainability and performance standards. However, increased transparency also introduces regulatory challenges.
“Larger firms can more easily adopt these advanced technologies, but smaller firms might struggle with the costs,” Sarah explained. “This raises concerns about fair competition. If smaller firms can’t afford to comply with complex transparency requirements, innovation could be stifled.”
Throughout our discussion, Sarah emphasised the importance of research and higher education in addressing these challenges. Researchers must explore the interplay between digital tools and physical products, while educational institutions must evolve curricula to teach students how to work with these elements.
“Research is needed to clarify roles and responsibilities within the regulatory framework and to develop performance-based regulations that are both flexible and demanding in terms of competence and oversight,” Sarah said. “Educational programmes should focus on regulatory literacy, advocacy, and ethical decision-making, equipping students to critically engage with and challenge regulations when necessary.”
As our conversation drew to a close, it was clear that the path forward requires collaboration between researchers, educators, and industry professionals. By understanding and adapting to the challenges of innovation, safety, and performance, robust, independent research and education can drive the necessary changes in regulatory frameworks. This, in turn, will help ensure that construction products continue to meet society’s demands while fostering a resilient and forward-thinking industry.
Lewis Davis
Be the first to comment