The Gateway Bottleneck: Low Approval Rates for Higher-Risk Building Applications in the UK

Summary

The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has approved a mere 14% of higher-risk building applications since October 2023. This low approval rate, coupled with a significant number of incomplete or non-compliant submissions, has led to substantial project delays and raised concerns within the construction industry. The BSR is working to streamline the process and provide clearer guidance to developers, emphasizing the importance of complete and accurate applications.

Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.

Main Story

Okay, so let’s talk about something that’s got the UK construction scene all knotted up: getting approval for high-risk building projects. It’s not exactly smooth sailing right now.

Since the Building Safety Act of 2022 dropped – remember that? – things have gotten way stricter. We’ve got the Building Safety Regulator, or BSR, now, and, frankly, their job isn’t easy, especially considering the backlog, or should I say bottleneck. Seriously, they’re really struggling. A recent Freedom of Information request revealed a real shocker: between October ’23 and September ’24, the BSR waved through a measly 14% of applications. Yep, 14%. That’s not just low, it’s, well, it’s concerning, isn’t it?

And why is that? Well, it seems a ton of applications are either missing key bits or just plain don’t meet the new rules. The BSR says over 40% fall into this category, isn’t that wild? So, they’re overloaded and dealing with incomplete paperwork, which obviously slows everything down. These delays have a domino effect, you know? Projects get pushed back, budgets blow up, and developers are left in a state of total uncertainty. I mean, imagine you’re trying to get a development going and you’re constantly waiting? It’d be a nightmare!

Now, this whole act was a direct result of the Grenfell tragedy; it’s there to make things safer, especially for those tall residential buildings – you know, over 18 meters, or seven or more stories, with at least a couple of apartments. Before they can even break ground, there’s this thing called “Gateway 2,” it requires developers to submit really detailed fire safety and structural plans. It’s a good idea on paper, of course, but getting there, that’s a whole other story.

The BSR knows it’s not perfect, and, to their credit, they’re working on it. They’re trying to streamline the application process, and, are giving developers clearer guidance on what they need for these high-risk projects. You know, more resources, and training stuff, which is good. They keep harping on about the importance of complete, accurate applications too, and they do have a point; good paperwork makes for quicker processing, who would have thought? Still, its not a quick fix.

And, of course, the construction industry is, rightly, feeling the pinch. They’re crying out for better communication and a more collaborative process. They need the BSR to step up and make things more efficient, you can’t blame them, can you? At the end of the day, it’s all about balancing safety and progress; no-one want’s unsafe buildings, but they want to keep projects moving, too. It’s about everyone involved – regulators, developers, you name it – working together to make sure these rules are used properly, without bringing construction to a grinding halt.

Ultimately, this low approval rate for higher-risk buildings is a real headache. Whilst the goal is safer buildings, things aren’t running as smoothly as we’d like. The BSR are making efforts to fix things, but it’s definitely a work in progress. And you know what? I think, at the very least, a touch of empathy and a real listening ear from all sides would go a long way. It feels like everyone needs to remember that everyone here is on the same side, well, mostly anyway!

10 Comments

  1. 14% approval rate, you say? It’s almost as if the building regulator has decided to become a highly exclusive club. I wonder, is there a velvet rope and a bouncer checking the paperwork? Maybe a secret handshake is required for compliance?

    • That’s a great analogy! It certainly feels like there’s an exclusivity to the process right now. The sheer number of incomplete applications suggests a significant gap in understanding of the new requirements. Perhaps clearer communication and pre-application support could help move things along quicker.

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

      • I appreciate you highlighting the “exclusivity” aspect; it really does feel that way sometimes. I agree, pre-application support could be a game-changer in improving understanding of the complex new rules and reducing the number of incomplete submissions. It’s a point worth pushing for.

        Editor: FocusNews.Uk

        Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

        • It’s interesting you picked up on the “exclusivity” aspect, it’s more than just a feeling for many. The need for robust pre-application support is absolutely crucial to address this perceived barrier. This should also reduce the number of incomplete applications we are seeing. Let’s hope these changes happen soon.

          Editor: FocusNews.Uk

          Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

          • Absolutely, that feeling of exclusivity is significant and not uncommon. Pre-application support is key; it’s not just about reducing incomplete apps, it’s about ensuring developers feel confident and informed navigating this process. It will improve the whole system.

            Editor: FocusNews.Uk

            Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

          • I agree, the confidence aspect is so important. It’s not just about ticking boxes, developers need to understand the *why* behind the requirements, which better pre-application support would certainly facilitate.

            Editor: FocusNews.Uk

            Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

  2. 14%? That’s not an approval rate, it’s a highly selective raffle. Are they handing out golden tickets now, or just rejecting sensible plans in favour of abstract art?

    • That’s a great way to put it! The “selective raffle” analogy really highlights the perceived difficulty of the process. It does make you wonder if a focus on clearer guidance and support, rather than just strict compliance, would help improve the current situation.

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

  3. The assertion that the regulator is “working on it” seems a generous interpretation of a 14% approval rate. Perhaps their efforts are not translating to improved outcomes for those navigating this complex process.

    • You raise a great point about the impact of the low approval rate. It’s clear that simply “working on it” isn’t enough if the improvements aren’t reflected in outcomes. The real challenge is making the process more effective for those navigating it.

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*