Summary
This article discusses the financial impact of new building safety regulations and taxes on UK housebuilders, focusing on Persimmon’s £40 million annual cost increase. It analyzes the implications for the government’s housing targets and the broader construction industry, exploring the balance between safety improvements and affordability. The piece also delves into the details of the Building Safety Levy and its potential effects on smaller builders and affordable housing provision.
Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.
Main Story
The UK construction industry is definitely in the midst of a big shift. New building safety regulations are landing hard, and, well, they’re not cheap. For example, Persimmon, a major player, reckons these new rules – think the Building Safety Levy and increased National Insurance – are going to add a staggering £40 million to their annual bills.
Now, that’s a huge number. You’ve got to wonder, can the government really hit its ambitious housing targets with this kind of financial pressure? And what about the smaller building companies, who probably don’t have as much financial wiggle room? It’s a bit of a worry.
Then there’s the Building Safety Act 2022, which started rolling out in October of 2023. It’s not just a tweak here and there, it’s a complete overhaul. The new Duty Holder Regime is one big change, meaning everyone involved in a building project, from the client to the contractor, is now more accountable for making sure things are safe. Which, on the one hand, is great! But, on the other, it adds layers of complexity – and more costs. Persimmon’s CEO, Dean Finch, says all this will cost the industry billions, and he’s probably not wrong.
Take the Building Safety Levy for example. This is basically a tax on new residential builds to help pay for fixing existing safety issues – kind of like a ‘sorry for the past’ fund. Fine in principle, I guess but it’s not a popular move! Many argue it’s unfair to penalize the whole industry, even companies that had nothing to do with the unsafe cladding that caused the Grenfell tragedy. And, it does raise a worrying question; will this levy hurt the push for affordable homes? Because, if developers are squeezed, might they scale back contributions to affordable housing schemes? That could be bad news, especially in places with lower property values.
And that’s not the end of the changes, oh no. They’ve also changed how they define when building work ‘commences’. Now, you’ve only got three years to actually start construction after you get approval, or the approval lapses – no wiggle room. Which is making everybody rush to start work. I know a mate of mine who had to reapply for approval because his site was delayed for just over a month! It really does highlight the need for super sharp planning, if you ask me.
So, with the government aiming for 1.5 million new homes by 2029, there’s a pretty big challenge ahead. Some planning reforms are welcome, but it’s hard not to feel concerned for the smaller builders facing these rising costs. It remains to be seen what all this will mean for the UK housing market in the long run, as the industry tries to balance safety and affordability. Personally? I feel like this is going to take time to sort, but, at least we’re talking about it, right?
£40 million? That’s enough to build a safety wall around a small country, and it sounds like housebuilders might need one given these new rules! Hope everyone’s got their hard hats on, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.
That’s a great way to put it! A bumpy ride indeed, and it certainly highlights the scale of the financial challenges housebuilders are facing. The comparison to a safety wall is very apt when you consider the focus on increased safety measures. It will be interesting to see how the industry navigates this.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The new definition of “commencement” adding further pressure highlights a need for robust project management and adaptable timelines across the construction sector. This will certainly impact planning and approval strategies for both large and smaller developers alike.
That’s a really important point about the new definition of ‘commencement’ and its impact on project timelines. It definitely puts pressure on everyone to be more organised from the get-go. I think adaptable planning is going to be key for success with these changes. Thanks for sharing your insights.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The three-year limit on commencing construction after approval is a significant challenge, particularly for projects that face unforeseen delays. This could lead to a bottleneck in the approval process as developers rush to meet deadlines.
You’ve hit on a crucial point regarding the three-year limit. The potential bottleneck in the approval process is certainly something to consider, and how that rush to start projects could influence the quality of initial planning. It might create pressure where it’s least needed. Thanks for highlighting that.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The financial implications for smaller developers, as highlighted, are particularly concerning. It will be interesting to see how they adapt to the increased cost burden and the potential impact on their project pipelines.
Absolutely, the adaptability of smaller developers is a key aspect to monitor. Their innovative approaches to planning might offer valuable lessons for the entire sector on how to navigate these new cost pressures. This could be a catalyst for some unique solutions.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The point about the potential impact on affordable housing is significant. If developers reduce contributions due to increased costs, it could create further challenges for those most in need of housing.
That’s a really important point. The potential reduction in contributions to affordable housing could indeed have a significant impact on those who need it most. We need to monitor this closely to see how the industry adapts to the cost pressures. Let’s hope solutions are found that benefit everyone.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk
The increasing accountability within the Duty Holder Regime may also encourage more innovation in construction methods and materials. Could a focus on long-term safety and reduced liability drive adoption of more sustainable, inherently safer building practices?
That’s a fantastic point about the Duty Holder Regime driving innovation! The focus on long-term safety could definitely be a catalyst for adopting sustainable materials and construction methods. Imagine buildings designed with inherent safety and minimal long-term liability – a real game-changer for the industry and the environment.
Editor: FocusNews.Uk
Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy – https://focus360energy.co.uk