Kingspan Unaware of Grenfell Risk

Summary

The Grenfell Tower Inquiry revealed that a Kingspan technical boss wasn’t aware their product was unsafe for tall buildings. This highlights the critical need for stricter building regulations and corporate accountability in the construction industry. The tragedy underscores the importance of transparency and ethical practices to prevent future disasters.

Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.

** Main Story**

The Grenfell Tower fire. June 2017. Seventy-two lives lost. It wasn’t just a tragedy; it ripped open some serious flaws in the UK’s building regulations and construction scene. The inquiry afterwards? A litany of failures, from dodgy cladding to a complete lack of oversight.

And then there was that Kingspan technical boss… Honestly, claiming ignorance about the dangers their insulation posed to tall buildings? Just mind-blowing. I mean, come on. It screams for more accountability, a whole lot more transparency, and regulations that actually bite.

A Lack of Awareness? Really?

Tony Millichap, Kingspan’s former head of technical, said he didn’t know their K15 insulation was a no-go for high-rises. Now, Kingspan’s sticking to its guns, saying the ACM cladding was the real villain, not their insulation. But, still, Millichap’s testimony? It just stinks of something rotten within the company’s structure and, you know, how they communicate internally. Like, how does a senior tech guy not know something so fundamental to safety? It doesn’t add up. It screams a disconnect. A disconnect between understanding the tech, the marketing spin, and, crucially, the public’s safety.

I remember once, at a conference, hearing a similar story about a different company. The sales team promised the moon, but the engineers were facepalming the whole time. Sounds familiar?

Building Regs: Time for an Overhaul

Grenfell, that inquiry, it’s all led to a massive outcry for change. And rightly so. The government has made some moves, banning combustible materials on high-rise exteriors. Which is a start. But, many of us think it’s not nearly enough. Gaps, big gaping holes, were exposed in the current regulations. Regulations need to be stricter, with way more oversight on both construction products and how they’re actually used. The inquiry hammered home the point: regs can’t just list acceptable materials. They need to ensure manufacturers actually get the safety standards and stick to them. And that someone is checking, properly. It’s also about making sure everyone knows their roles: manufacturers, contractors, even the building control guys.

Corporate Accountability: Where’s the Shame?

The Grenfell inquiry also shone a spotlight on some ugly truths about corporate accountability. We’re talking misleading marketing, manipulating tests, and a general ‘who cares?’ attitude towards fire safety from some manufacturers. Frankly, it’s disgusting. This kind of behavior, it needs to be hit hard. Stronger penalties, real enforcement for companies who put profits before people. Transparency too, absolutely crucial. Architects, builders, consumers need crystal-clear info on how construction products perform in a fire. No ifs, no buts. And this transparency needs to extend to the testing process itself. We need to know those results are legit, reliable, not cooked up in some back room somewhere. Building trust again? That means a complete overhaul in the industry’s culture. Putting safety and ethics, always, above that bottom line. I really hate it, when you see corporate arrogance trump common sense, it’s really the worst.

Lessons Learned: Charting a New Course

The Grenfell Tower fire… a brutal wake-up call. Regulations were a mess, practices were questionable, and the whole corporate culture? Let’s just say it needed a serious intervention. The inquiry’s findings, they’re a roadmap for fixing things. Stricter regs, way more accountability, and a serious dose of transparency. It’s a simple as that.

For the future? The industry has to embrace these changes. No more excuses. That means a culture that puts safety first, thorough testing, proper certification, and crystal-clear information on all construction products. Because, in the end, those seventy-two lives? They demand nothing less, we can’t forget that.

9 Comments

  1. “A lack of awareness?” Really? If senior tech guys aren’t aware, maybe we need mandatory fire safety training…or at least a company-wide game of “Two Truths and a Lie” about insulation. Imagine the water cooler debates!

    • That “Two Truths and a Lie” game is a brilliant idea! Imagine how quickly crucial information would surface. Maybe it’s time to gamify corporate training for better awareness and knowledge retention in the construction sector? The water cooler debates alone would be worth it!

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy

  2. The disconnect between the sales team and engineers highlights a crucial point. How can companies ensure internal alignment on safety and performance claims, especially when marketing pressures exist? Perhaps mandatory cross-departmental training could bridge this gap.

    • That’s a really important point about internal alignment! Mandatory cross-departmental training is a great suggestion. Maybe incorporating real-life case studies and simulations could help teams understand the potential consequences of miscommunication and prioritize safety over marketing pressures. It’s all about fostering a culture of shared responsibility.

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy

  3. “Ignorance is bliss,” they say, but maybe not when we’re talking about building safety! Perhaps a ‘lunch and learn’ session on high-rise fire risks, combined with a good old game of Jenga using insulation samples, could keep everyone on their toes?

    • That’s a fantastic idea! Gamifying the learning experience could definitely make fire safety training more engaging and memorable. The Jenga analogy is particularly clever – a visual and tactile way to understand the importance of each component in building safety! Let’s hope the industry takes note of these innovative approaches.

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy

  4. “Ignorance is bliss,” unless you’re a technical boss, right? Makes you wonder, were they *really* unaware, or was plausible deniability the game? And if they didn’t know, what *were* they doing all day? Perhaps checking their social media accounts?

    • That’s a really insightful point! The question of plausible deniability is definitely at the heart of this issue. It makes you wonder about the systems and checks that should have been in place. How do we ensure that key personnel are informed and accountable, regardless of intent?

      Editor: FocusNews.Uk

      Thank you to our Sponsor Focus 360 Energy

  5. “Who cares?” corporate attitude? Sounds like someone needs a crash course in empathy, alongside that fire safety training. Maybe a company-wide book club focusing on ethics? Just spitballing here!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*