Modernise or Die: Eight Years On – A Deep Dive into the UK Construction Sector’s Enduring Transformation

Remember 2016? It seems a lifetime ago, doesn’t it? Back then, the UK construction industry found itself staring down the barrel of a crisis, a slow-burning fuse threatening to detonate the very foundations of how we build. That year, Mark Farmer, the sharp-minded CEO of Cast Consultancy, dropped a bombshell of a report. He didn’t pull any punches, did he? Titled ‘Modernise or Die,’ his review of the UK Construction Labour Model wasn’t just a report; it was a stark warning, a rallying cry that resonated across boardrooms and building sites alike.

Farmer’s assessment was unflinching. He laid bare the industry’s deep-seated systemic issues, problems that had festered for years, holding back progress and stifling innovation. It truly felt like a reckoning was overdue, a moment to face the uncomfortable truths that many had long ignored.

The Cracks in the Foundation: Unpacking the Pre-2016 Landscape

Focus360 Energy: property compliance services – pre-planning to post-construction. Learn more.

Before we delve into the recommendations and the subsequent journey, let’s cast our minds back and really understand the precarious position the industry was in. Imagine, if you will, a vast, complex machine, essential for national growth, yet sputtering and misfiring in ways that defied modern logic. That, in essence, was UK construction before Farmer’s intervention. What were the critical flaws?

• A Persistent Productivity Lag: This wasn’t just a minor blip; it was an ingrained, generational issue. Construction’s productivity figures looked dismal when compared to almost any other major industry, especially manufacturing or automotive. We’re talking about a sector that often stuck to methods largely unchanged for decades, clinging to manual processes where digital solutions flourished elsewhere. Think about it: a car plant in the 2000s versus a typical building site – the contrast was startling. This resistance to change, often born out of contractual structures that incentivized cheap labour over efficiency, led to colossal inefficiencies and significant cost overruns.

• Chronic Underinvestment in Training and Skills: The industry was cannibalising its future by not properly investing in its people. We weren’t just short of skilled workers; we were failing to adequately train those we had, and critically, failing to attract new blood. Apprenticeship schemes, where they existed, often felt outdated, not equipping workers with the advanced digital or off-site manufacturing skills that were clearly on the horizon. Many firms relied on a sort of informal, ‘learn on the job’ approach, which, while valuable, often meant a lack of consistent, certified upskilling. This created skill gaps, impacting quality, safety, and our collective capacity for innovation.

• The Grey Tsunami: An Aging Workforce: This was a ticking demographic time bomb. An increasing proportion of the workforce was nearing retirement age, and alarmingly, there weren’t enough younger people entering the sector to replace them. What happens when experienced tradespeople, project managers, and engineers hang up their hard hats? You lose not just hands-on capability but also invaluable institutional knowledge, the tacit understanding built over decades. It’s like watching a vital library slowly empty, its precious books disappearing without being catalogued or passed on. The industry desperately needed to refresh its ranks, otherwise, sustainability simply wasn’t going to be possible.

• A Fragmented, Adversarial Supply Chain: Ah, the dreaded ‘silo mentality.’ Construction projects typically involve a bewildering array of designers, main contractors, sub-contractors, specialists, and suppliers. Often, these entities operated in isolation, with poor communication, misaligned incentives, and a pervasive blame culture. It wasn’t uncommon for disputes to erupt over small changes, delaying projects and souring relationships. This fragmentation meant a huge amount of duplicated effort, poor data sharing, and a general lack of collaborative problem-solving. Everyone was protecting their patch, and the project, and ultimately the client, suffered.

Farmer’s Blueprint: Ten Calls to Action

Farmer didn’t just highlight the problems; he offered solutions. His report wasn’t just a lament; it was a manifesto for change, a detailed roadmap for how the industry could pull itself out of the mire. He put forward ten crucial recommendations, some of which were genuinely radical for the time.

1. Reforming the Construction Industry Training Board (CITB): This was a big one, wasn’t it? The CITB, funded by a levy on construction firms, was meant to be the vanguard of industry training. But for years, criticism mounted that it was inefficient, out of touch, and not effectively addressing the industry’s rapidly evolving needs. Farmer argued for a radical overhaul, envisioning a leaner, more responsive organisation that would truly align training provision with modern demands, focusing on things like digital skills and off-site manufacturing techniques. The goal was to ensure the levy actually delivered tangible benefits and demonstrable skills improvement.

2. Championing Off-Site Construction Techniques (MMC): This was arguably the cornerstone of ‘Modernise or Die.’ Farmer passionately advocated for a dramatic shift towards manufacturing components and even entire modules off-site in controlled factory environments. Think about it: better quality control, reduced waste, faster construction times, safer working conditions, and less disruption on site. The UK had flirted with prefabrication before, often with mixed results, but Farmer’s vision was different, focused on precision engineering and advanced manufacturing processes. It was about seeing construction less as a craft and more as a sophisticated manufacturing process.

3. Elevating the Industry’s Image: Let’s be honest, construction often gets a bit of a bad rap, doesn’t it? Perceived as dirty, dangerous, and low-tech, it struggled to attract the brightest and best, particularly younger generations and women. Farmer pushed for concerted outreach programs, working with schools and colleges, to showcase the exciting, diverse career paths available – from digital designers to robotics engineers, project managers to sustainability specialists. It was about rebranding, making the industry attractive and aspirational.

4. Government as Enabler: Strategic Intervention: Farmer argued that the government couldn’t just stand by. He called for direct policy interventions to grease the wheels of progress. This included streamlining cumbersome planning processes, which often add months, if not years, to projects. He also advocated for incentives, perhaps through procurement, to encourage innovation and the adoption of modern methods, effectively using government’s purchasing power to drive change.

5. The Controversial 0.5% Tax on Non-Compliant Clients: Now, this one certainly stirred the pot! Farmer proposed a levy on clients who weren’t actively engaging in best practices or who continued to procure in ways that perpetuated the industry’s inefficiencies. The idea was to create a funding stream for technological development and innovation, essentially penalising those who weren’t playing ball and using the funds to help those who were. It was a bold, some would say audacious, suggestion designed to force behavioural change from the very top of the supply chain. What a talking point that was!

Government’s Nod and the Road Not Taken

The UK government, perhaps sensing the urgency and validity of Farmer’s arguments, responded positively. They accepted most of the ten recommendations, recognising the critical need for a more productive, skilled, and sustainable construction sector. It was a clear signal that the concerns raised were legitimate and that reform was necessary. However, and this is where it gets interesting, they notably shied away from implementing that proposed 0.5% tax on non-compliant clients. Political palatability likely played a huge part; nobody wants to introduce new taxes if they can help it, especially on a sector that’s already crucial for economic recovery. The idea, though, truly highlighted the core issue of client behaviour driving industry norms, didn’t it?

Building Towards the Future: Post-Review Reforms and Developments

Since Farmer’s influential report, we’ve witnessed a flurry of legislative changes and new initiatives, each aiming to incrementally, or in some cases, radically, shift the industry’s trajectory. These aren’t just minor tweaks; they represent significant policy commitments to a more responsible, efficient, and forward-looking construction sector.

• The Future Homes Standard (FHS): A Greener Blueprint: Mark your calendars for 1 October 2026, because that’s when the Future Homes Standard really kicks in. This isn’t merely about getting new residential buildings to an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of ‘C’ or above – though that’s a huge step in itself. The FHS is a fundamental rethink of how we design and construct homes to be highly energy-efficient and low-carbon. It signals a near-total ban on fossil fuel heating systems, mandating the use of technologies like air source heat pumps and solar panels. What this means for housebuilders is a massive challenge and opportunity to embrace advanced building fabric specifications, excellent insulation, and smart ventilation systems. It’s pushing us towards homes that are essentially ‘net-zero ready,’ vastly reducing their operational carbon footprint. For the industry, it’s a paradigm shift, requiring new skills in designing, installing, and commissioning these integrated low-carbon systems. You can’t just build a house anymore; you’ve got to build an ultra-efficient energy system with four walls around it.

• The Building Safety Levy: A New Era of Accountability: Also commencing on 1 October 2026, the Building Safety Levy represents a direct, poignant response to the tragedies of the past, particularly the Grenfell Tower fire. It’s more than just a charge; it’s a profound statement about accountability. This levy applies to new residential developments in England comprising 10 dwellings or more, with the collected funds earmarked for remediating historic building safety defects, making existing homes safer for residents. It’s part of the broader Building Safety Act 2022, which fundamentally overhauls building regulations and aims to instill a culture of safety-first, shifting responsibility onto those who design, build, and manage high-rise residential buildings. For developers, this means not just paying a levy, but fundamentally reviewing their processes, materials, and competencies. It’s a clear signal: building safety isn’t an afterthought; it’s paramount, and the costs of past failures won’t be borne by the taxpayer or residents alone.

• Fast-Track Building Regulations Approval for Self-Builders: Cutting the Red Tape: Anyone who’s ever tried to build their own home knows the sheer frustration of navigating the planning and building regulations maze. Delays here can easily stretch projects, impacting budgets and mental well-being. The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has wisely stepped in to address this bottleneck by introducing a fast-track process for certain new-build applications, including self-build projects. This initiative is a breath of fresh air, aiming to slash approval wait times from potentially many months down to just weeks. It’s about empowering individuals and small developers, removing a significant barrier to entry, and ultimately, encouraging more housing development, especially custom and self-builds. For an industry often criticised for its glacial pace, this is a welcome injection of efficiency, showing that government can indeed act to streamline processes when it really wants to.

The Industry’s Own Initiative: Beyond Legislation

It’s not just government driving change; the industry itself has been stepping up. Organisations like the Construction Leadership Council (CLC) have been instrumental in driving programmes focused on digitalisation, skills, and sustainability. We’ve seen a much greater push for the adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) level 2 and beyond, fostering better collaboration and data exchange across project lifecycles. There’s a palpable shift towards understanding the whole-life cost of buildings, not just the upfront capital expenditure. Furthermore, the focus on ‘Construction 4.0’ – integrating technologies like AI, IoT, and robotics – is slowly gaining traction, promising smarter sites and more efficient processes. Apprenticeship schemes are slowly adapting, offering pathways into digital construction and modern methods, trying to entice the next generation with exciting, tech-driven careers rather than just traditional trades.

The Unfinished Business: Persistent Challenges and the Path Forward

Despite these significant strides, the journey is far from over. The construction industry, much like any complex ecosystem, continues to grapple with deep-seated issues that resist quick fixes. It’s a bit like trying to turn a supertanker around; you can initiate the manoeuvre, but it takes considerable time and sustained effort to see a complete change in direction.

• The Enduring Skills Shortage: This remains perhaps the most formidable challenge. While efforts are underway, the pipeline of new talent simply isn’t robust enough to meet demand, especially as we lose experienced workers to retirement. Post-Brexit, the availability of skilled labour from Europe has tightened considerably, exacerbating the problem. And it’s not just about numbers; it’s about the right skills. We desperately need more people proficient in digital tools (BIM, data analytics, automation), green construction techniques (installing heat pumps, understanding fabric efficiency), and off-site manufacturing processes. How do we make construction an attractive, high-tech career choice for school leavers and graduates? That’s the million-dollar question, isn’t it?

• Productivity’s Stubborn Plateau: Yes, there have been improvements, but the UK construction industry’s productivity still lags behind many comparable sectors. The cultural inertia, adversarial contracting models, and reluctance to invest heavily in R&D often mean we’re still seeing inefficient practices on too many sites. The economic climate, with its fluctuating material costs and interest rates, doesn’t always encourage long-term investment in productivity-enhancing technologies either. It’s a Catch-22: you need to invest to improve, but economic uncertainty makes investment risky.

• The Fragmented Supply Chain, Revisited: Despite all the talk of collaboration, the industry’s supply chain often remains fragmented. Different tiers of contractors, designers, and specialists still operate in silos, leading to communication breakdowns, duplicated efforts, and a lack of integrated problem-solving. While digital platforms and BIM aim to connect these dots, widespread, seamless adoption is still a work in progress. It’s hard to foster true innovation when everyone’s still primarily looking out for their own short-term interests. We need to shift towards genuine partnerships, where shared risk and reward incentivise collective success.

Charting the Course: What Must Be Done Now

To truly complete this transformation, the industry can’t afford to rest on its laurels. We need a sustained, concerted effort on several fronts:

• Radical Investment in Training and Development: This isn’t just about apprenticeships anymore. It’s about comprehensive, future-focused upskilling across the entire workforce. Think digital bootcamps for existing professionals, specialised training in Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) and green technologies, and leadership programmes that foster innovation and collaboration. Partnerships between industry, government, and educational institutions are absolutely vital. We need to market construction careers effectively, highlighting the exciting technological advancements and the chance to build a sustainable future. Why wouldn’t a bright young mind want to shape the world around them, you know?

• Cultivating True Collaboration Across the Supply Chain: We need to move beyond simply paying lip service to collaboration. This means adopting integrated project delivery models, involving key supply chain partners much earlier in the design process, and establishing long-term, trust-based relationships instead of one-off, lowest-bidder contracts. Digital platforms and common data environments must become the norm, allowing for seamless information flow and joint problem-solving. When everyone’s on the same page, sharing data and insights, that’s when real efficiency and innovation blossom.

• Aggressively Embracing Technology and Digitalisation: The future of construction is digital. This means widespread adoption of advanced technologies: AI for design optimisation and risk prediction, robotics for repetitive or hazardous tasks on site, virtual and augmented reality for training and design visualisation, and drones for surveying and progress monitoring. It’s about seeing technology not as a cost, but as an indispensable investment that delivers huge returns in productivity, safety, and quality. We need to get better at showing the ROI and incentivising firms to make these crucial tech leaps.

• Prioritising Sustainability and Resilience: Beyond the Future Homes Standard, the industry must fully embrace the circular economy, drastically reducing waste, reusing materials, and designing for deconstruction. We also need to build more resilient structures and infrastructure, capable of withstanding the increasing impacts of climate change, from extreme weather events to rising sea levels. This isn’t just an ethical imperative; it’s becoming an economic one.

A Journey, Not a Destination

The Farmer Review was indeed a watershed moment, a stark and necessary ‘wake-up call’ for an industry that desperately needed to shed its archaic skin. The government’s subsequent actions, through robust reforms and proactive initiatives, clearly demonstrate a commitment to modernising the sector. Yet, as we look around today, it’s abundantly clear that this journey of transformation isn’t a sprint; it’s a marathon. The echoes of ‘Modernise or Die’ still resonate, perhaps even more loudly, as new challenges emerge and the urgency to build better, smarter, and greener intensifies. Sustained effort, unwavering commitment, and genuine collaboration across all stakeholders are not just desirable; they are absolutely essential to ensure we build a truly sustainable, efficient, and resilient construction industry for the generations to come.

Because, let’s face it, we can’t afford not to, can we?

References

• Farmer Review of the UK Construction Labour Model. (2016). gov.uk
• Construction labour market in the UK: Farmer review – government response. (2017). gov.uk
• The UK Living Sector: What Might We Expect in 2026? | Insights | Greenberg Traurig LLP. (2025). gtlaw.com
• Self-builders could skip the queue with new fast-track route for building regulations approval announced. (2025). homebuilding.co.uk