Advancements and Prospects of Small Modular Reactors in the Global Energy Landscape

Abstract

Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) represent a profound paradigm shift in nuclear energy technology, moving beyond the traditional large-scale gigawatt-class designs to embrace scalable, flexible, and potentially more economically competitive solutions. This comprehensive report undertakes an exhaustive analysis of SMR technology, meticulously examining its inherent advantages, the intricate landscape of current global development, diverse potential applications extending far beyond conventional grid-scale electricity generation, the complex regulatory pathways governing their deployment, and their projected economic viability. By thoroughly exploring these multifaceted dimensions, this report endeavours to illuminate the pivotal role SMRs are poised to play within the evolving global energy mix, with a particular emphasis on the strategic initiatives being undertaken by the United Kingdom to integrate SMRs into its ambitious future energy infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The global energy sector is presently navigating an unprecedented period of transformative change, primarily impelled by the urgent imperatives to drastically reduce carbon emissions, enhance energy security, and transition towards a more sustainable and resilient energy future. Nuclear power, distinguished by its exceptionally low carbon footprint during operation, its high capacity factor, and its inherent dispatchability, has historically served as a foundational cornerstone of this energy transition in numerous nations. However, the deployment of traditional large-scale nuclear reactors has historically encountered significant formidable challenges. These include prohibitively high capital costs, often extending into tens of billions of dollars per project, protracted and frequently uncertain construction timelines that can span over a decade or more, and persistent public perception concerns relating to safety, waste management, and proliferation risks. These challenges have, in many instances, constrained the widespread adoption and rapid deployment of conventional nuclear power.

In direct response to these intricate challenges, Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) have emerged as a highly promising and potentially disruptive alternative within the nuclear energy landscape. These innovative reactors offer a distinctly more flexible, adaptable, and potentially cost-effective approach to clean energy production. The defining characteristics of SMRs revolve around their intrinsically smaller physical size, typically generating an electrical output of up to 300 MWe (megawatts electric), and their fundamental modular design principles. This modularity facilitates extensive factory-based fabrication of components and systems, enabling standardized production, enhanced quality control, and expedited on-site assembly. These attributes collectively position SMRs for deployment in an impressively diverse array of settings, ranging from remote, off-grid locations requiring localized power to dense urban centers demanding flexible, decarbonized energy solutions. Crucially, SMRs are also designed to serve a myriad of applications extending significantly beyond mere electricity generation, encompassing vital processes such as industrial heat supply, water desalination, and the production of clean hydrogen.

Recognizing the profound strategic potential of SMRs in addressing its ambitious climate targets, bolstering energy security, and fostering economic growth, the United Kingdom has proactively positioned itself at the forefront of global SMR development. The UK government is not only actively supporting the research and development of these advanced technologies but is also establishing robust frameworks for their potential large-scale deployment, signaling a clear national commitment to integrating SMRs into its future energy infrastructure.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Definitional Framework and Classification of SMRs

While the term Small Modular Reactor is widely used, a precise definition helps in understanding their unique attributes. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) defines SMRs as advanced nuclear reactors that produce electricity up to 300 MW (electric equivalent) and are designed with modularity in mind, allowing for factory fabrication and streamlined assembly on site. This definition emphasizes both their power output and their innovative construction methodology. Beyond this, SMRs are often categorized by their Generation (Gen) and reactor type, reflecting their technological maturity and core design principles.

2.1 Power Output Segmentation

SMRs typically fall into several size categories, though precise classifications can vary:

• Micro-reactors: Often less than 10 MWe, these are designed for very specific, localized power needs, such as remote communities, military bases, or industrial sites. They are typically factory-assembled and transportable.
• Small Reactors: Ranging from 10 MWe to 100 MWe. These can serve smaller grids, industrial parks, or specific applications like desalination plants.
• Modular Reactors: Generally between 100 MWe and 300 MWe, these are often designed for multi-module deployment to achieve larger cumulative capacities, offering inherent scalability.

2.2 Reactor Technology Classification

SMR designs span a broad spectrum of nuclear technologies, not limited to light water reactors (LWRs) that dominate the current global nuclear fleet. This diversity reflects a pursuit of enhanced safety, efficiency, and broader application flexibility. Key technology types include:

• Light Water Reactors (LWRs): These are the most common type, using ordinary water as both coolant and neutron moderator. SMR versions often incorporate integral designs, where major components like the reactor core, steam generators, and pumps are housed within a single pressure vessel, simplifying the system and enhancing passive safety. Examples include NuScale Power’s design and GE-Hitachi’s BWRX-300.
• High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGRs): These reactors use helium gas as a coolant and graphite as a moderator. They operate at much higher temperatures (750-950°C), making them highly suitable for industrial process heat applications and efficient hydrogen production. Their fuel (TRISO particles) offers exceptional safety characteristics, retaining fission products even at very high temperatures. China’s HTR-PM is a leading example.
• Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs): These advanced reactors use a fluid salt mixture, typically containing nuclear fuel, as both coolant and fuel. MSRs offer potential advantages such as high operating temperatures, passive safety, and the possibility of ‘breeding’ new fuel or consuming existing nuclear waste. Their liquid fuel design eliminates many of the issues associated with solid fuels. Terrestrial Energy’s IMSR (Integrated Molten Salt Reactor) is a prominent design.
• Fast Neutron Reactors (FNRs) / Liquid Metal Reactors (LMRs): These reactors use liquid metals (sodium, lead, or lead-bismuth eutectic) as coolants and operate with fast (unmoderated) neutrons. FNRs can efficiently burn transuranic waste, significantly reducing the volume and radiotoxicity of spent nuclear fuel. They also have the potential to breed new fuel. Examples include Russia’s BREST-OD-300 (lead-cooled) and designs from NewCleo (lead-cooled).

This broad technological landscape indicates that SMRs are not a singular technology but a diverse family of innovative nuclear designs tailored to meet a wide range of future energy needs.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Technological Advantages of SMRs

The inherent design philosophies underpinning SMRs confer several significant technological advantages that differentiate them from their large-scale predecessors, addressing many of the traditional barriers to nuclear energy deployment.

3.1 Smaller Footprint and Modular Construction

One of the most transformative advantages of SMRs is their compact physical footprint and the fundamental adoption of modular construction techniques. The reduced size of SMRs translates directly into less land area required for plant construction and operation, making them suitable for sites where large-scale plants would be infeasible or environmentally disruptive. This aspect significantly expands potential deployment locations, including former industrial sites or existing energy infrastructure hubs.

Crucially, the concept of modular construction is central to the SMR value proposition. Instead of undertaking the majority of complex construction activities on-site in an open and often unpredictable environment, SMR components and entire plant modules are designed for factory-based fabrication. This approach allows for:

• Enhanced Quality Control: Manufacturing in controlled, specialized factory environments with stable conditions, dedicated tooling, and experienced workforces leads to significantly higher manufacturing precision and quality assurance, minimizing construction defects and rework.
• Reduced Construction Time: Factory production can occur concurrently with site preparation. Once modules are complete, they are transported to the site for rapid assembly. This parallelization drastically compresses construction schedules, moving from decades to potentially as little as three to five years from ground-breaking to operation, including site preparation and commissioning. For instance, the Rolls-Royce SMR design aims for a construction timeline of approximately four years from site ground-breaking, contrasting sharply with the longer timelines associated with traditional large-scale nuclear projects that frequently extend beyond a decade (Nuclear AMRC, n.d.).
• Cost Predictability and Reduction: Standardized design and mass manufacturing techniques enable economies of series production rather than one-off, bespoke builds. This learning curve effect, akin to that seen in aerospace or shipbuilding industries, is expected to drive down per-unit capital costs with each successive deployment. The ability to pre-fabricate and pre-assemble modules off-site also mitigates risks associated with adverse weather conditions, labor disputes, and complex on-site sequencing, all of which often contribute to cost overruns in large projects.
• Supply Chain Optimization: Modularization fosters the development of a dedicated and specialized supply chain for module manufacturing, promoting industrial efficiency and fostering a robust ecosystem of skilled workers and advanced manufacturing capabilities.

3.2 Enhanced Safety Features

SMRs are designed to embody the highest standards of nuclear safety, often incorporating advanced, inherent, and passive safety features that go beyond those found in current Generation III and III+ reactors. These features are fundamental to the reactor’s design and rely on natural physical phenomena rather than active mechanical components or human intervention, significantly reducing the probability and potential consequences of accidents.

Key aspects of SMR safety include:

• Passive Safety Systems: Many SMR designs rely on natural circulation, convection, gravity, or heat pipes to remove decay heat and maintain core cooling, even in the event of a station blackout (loss of all AC power). For example, the BWRX-300 design by GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy utilizes natural circulation for cooling the reactor core, eliminating the need for external power or operator action to remove decay heat for an extended period following a shutdown. This ‘walk-away safety’ concept means that, after an abnormal event, the plant can reach a safe, stable state without intervention for at least 72 hours, or even indefinitely in some designs (BWRX-300, n.d.).
• Reduced Reactor Core and Coolant Inventory: The smaller thermal power output of SMRs means they have smaller reactor cores and a significantly reduced inventory of radioactive materials and coolant. This inherently limits the potential energy release and radioactive source term in the highly improbable event of an accident, reducing the potential impact on the environment and public.
• Integral Reactor Design: Many SMRs (e.g., NuScale Power’s design) employ an integral pressure vessel that contains the reactor core, steam generators, and primary coolant pumps within a single unit. This eliminates large bore piping, which is a potential source of loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs) in traditional designs, thereby enhancing containment integrity and simplifying safety systems (NuScale Power, n.d.).
• Enhanced Fuel Designs: Some advanced SMRs utilize novel fuel forms, such as TRISO (TRi-structural ISOtropic) fuel particles used in HTGRs, which have multiple layers of ceramic coatings that act as miniature pressure vessels and containment barriers, retaining fission products even at extreme temperatures. This significantly enhances the safety margin during upset conditions.
• Underground or Partially Underground Siting: Some SMR designs are envisioned for partial or full underground siting, offering enhanced protection against external hazards (e.g., seismic events, extreme weather, accidental impacts) and potentially improving security.

This holistic design philosophy significantly enhances the safety and reliability of SMRs, aiming for unparalleled levels of resilience to potential hazards and contributing to increased public confidence.

3.3 Flexibility and Scalability

The modular and smaller nature of SMRs grants them exceptional operational flexibility and inherent scalability, addressing key limitations of large-scale nuclear plants.

• Incremental Deployment: Energy providers can deploy SMRs incrementally, adding modules as demand grows or as older generation assets retire. This ‘build-as-you-grow’ approach reduces upfront capital investment risk and allows for more precise matching of generation capacity with actual demand, avoiding over- or under-capacity issues. A multi-module SMR plant can be commissioned module by module, generating revenue earlier.
• Load Following Capabilities: Unlike traditional baseload nuclear plants which often operate at a constant power output, many SMR designs are being developed with enhanced load-following capabilities. This means they can ramp their power output up or down more rapidly to accommodate fluctuations in electricity demand or the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources like wind and solar. This characteristic is vital for grid stability in energy systems with increasing renewable penetration.
• Distributed Generation: SMRs can be strategically located closer to demand centers, reducing transmission losses and enhancing grid resilience. Their suitability for distributed generation allows for improved energy security by diversifying energy sources across a wider geographic area, making the grid less susceptible to centralized failures or external threats.
• Adaptability to Grid Needs: As grids evolve with more intermittent renewables, the reliable, dispatchable power and load-following capabilities of SMRs can provide essential grid services such as frequency regulation, voltage support, and black start capability, enhancing overall grid stability and reliability.

This flexibility makes SMRs a highly versatile tool for modernizing energy infrastructures, diversifying energy sources, and supporting the transition to more dynamic, decarbonized energy systems.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Global Development Status

The development and deployment of SMR technology is a truly global endeavor, with significant advancements being made across numerous countries. This section provides a snapshot of key national initiatives and international collaborations.

4.1 United Kingdom Initiatives

The UK government has articulated a clear and strong commitment to nuclear power as a cornerstone of its net-zero emissions strategy and energy security ambitions. The ‘Powering Up Britain’ strategy outlines an aim to quadruple nuclear capacity by 2050, reaching up to 24 GW, a significant portion of which is expected to come from SMRs.

In 2023, the government formalized its support by launching Great British Nuclear (GBN), an arm’s-length body tasked with accelerating new nuclear projects, including SMRs. GBN initiated a competitive process for SMR deployment, inviting reactor designers to bid for government support. Rolls-Royce SMR, a consortium involving Rolls-Royce, BNF Resources UK, and Exelon Generation, was subsequently selected as the preferred bidder to develop SMRs in the UK. This decision was backed by substantial government funding, including an initial £210 million from the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, aimed at advancing the design and development towards regulatory approval and deployment (GOV.UK, 2023).

The Rolls-Royce SMR design is a 470 MWe pressurized water reactor (PWR) that leverages proven nuclear technology, aiming for a high degree of modularity and factory fabrication. The consortium envisions a fleet-based approach, with plans to have the first power station operational by the mid-2030s, followed by rapid deployment of subsequent units across sites like Trawsfynydd, Wylfa, and Oldbury. The design has been undergoing the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) process by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) and the Environment Agency, crucial for regulatory approval (Nuclear AMRC, n.d.). The UK’s strategic rationale extends beyond energy generation; it seeks to revitalize its domestic nuclear supply chain, create high-value manufacturing jobs, and export SMR technology globally.

4.2 International Developments

The international landscape for SMR development is vibrant and highly competitive, with diverse designs and strategic objectives across continents.

• United States: The U.S. has been a pioneer in SMR development, with significant private and public investment. NuScale Power’s 77 MWe integral pressurized water reactor (iPWR) design was the first SMR to receive design approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2020, a landmark achievement. NuScale is currently pursuing its first commercial deployment at the Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) in Idaho, aiming for operation in the late 2020s. Other notable U.S. developers include Terrestrial Energy with its Integrated Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR) and X-energy with its Xe-100 high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR), both of which are also receiving significant Department of Energy funding and progressing through licensing (NuScale Power, n.d.).
• Canada: Canada is pursuing a robust SMR strategy, viewing it as essential for decarbonizing its economy and providing clean energy to remote communities and heavy industry. Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is leading the deployment of the GE-Hitachi BWRX-300 SMR at the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station site, with construction already underway and targeting mid-2020s operation. This marks the first grid-scale SMR project under construction in a G7 country. Canada’s SMR action plan supports several streams of SMR technology, including LWRs, HTGRs, and advanced reactors like Moltex Energy’s Stable Salt Reactor – Wasteburner (SSR-W) and Terrestrial Energy’s IMSR, emphasizing innovation and diverse applications.
• China: China has made significant strides in advanced nuclear technology, including SMRs. The High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor – Pebble-bed Module (HTR-PM) demonstration project at Shidao Bay in Shandong province successfully connected to the grid in late 2021, marking a critical milestone for HTGR technology. This project, featuring two 250 MWth (thermal) reactors driving a single 210 MWe turbine, showcased the inherent safety characteristics and high-temperature heat capabilities of the design. China is also developing ACP100 SMR, a pressurized water reactor design, for potential domestic and export markets.
• Russia: Russia has operationalized the world’s first floating nuclear power plant, the Akademik Lomonosov, which became operational in 2020, providing power and heat to the remote Arctic town of Pevek. This unique application demonstrates the versatility of small reactors for isolated regions. Russia is also developing the BREST-OD-300 lead-cooled fast reactor, part of its ‘Proryv’ (Breakthrough) project, which aims for a closed nuclear fuel cycle, significantly reducing waste and proliferation concerns.
• South Korea: South Korea has developed the SMART (System-integrated Modular Advanced Reactor), a 100 MWe integral PWR, which received standard design approval from the Korean regulatory body in 2012. It is primarily envisioned for seawater desalination and electricity generation in regions with limited water and power resources.
• France and the European Union: France, with its extensive nuclear heritage, is actively pursuing SMRs. EDF is developing the NUWARD SMR, a 340 MWe (2 x 170 MWe) pressurized water reactor design, aiming for international deployment. The European Union has recognized nuclear energy, including SMRs, as a tool for decarbonization within its sustainable finance taxonomy, signaling support for future investments and regulatory harmonization across member states. Collaborative efforts like the European SMR Partnership aim to foster a common regulatory framework and supply chain across the continent.
• Japan: Japan is exploring SMR development, with companies like Hitachi-GE advancing designs such as the BWRX-300 in collaboration with international partners.
• Other Nations: Countries like Poland, Czech Republic, Estonia, and Romania are actively exploring or planning SMR deployment, often through partnerships with U.S. or Canadian developers, recognizing SMRs as a vital tool for achieving energy independence and decarbonization targets.

These global developments underscore the escalating interest and substantial investments being channeled into SMR technology, positioning it as a key component of the future energy landscape.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Potential Applications Beyond Grid-Scale Power

The versatility and modularity of SMRs extend their utility far beyond conventional baseload electricity generation, enabling them to address a broader spectrum of energy demands across various sectors. This capability is crucial for comprehensive decarbonization efforts.

5.1 Industrial Heat Supply

Industrial processes, particularly those involving high-temperature applications, account for a significant portion of global energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. SMRs can provide a reliable, high-temperature heat source, offering a clean alternative to fossil fuels for a wide array of industrial processes. This direct heat supply is often more efficient than converting heat to electricity and then back to heat.

• Target Industries: Key industries that can benefit include:
  • Chemical Production: Processes such as ammonia synthesis, methanol production, and plastics manufacturing require significant heat.
  • Refining and Petrochemicals: Heat is essential for distillation, cracking, and other processes.
  • Cement and Steel Production: These are highly energy-intensive industries requiring very high temperatures (over 1000°C in some cases), though current SMR designs may not reach these extreme levels directly for all processes, they can provide substantial pre-heating or steam generation.
  • Pulp and Paper: Requires significant steam for drying and processing.
  • Food and Beverage: Sterilization and processing require steam and heat.
• Temperature Ranges: While some SMR designs (especially LWR-based SMRs) provide steam at temperatures around 300°C suitable for a range of industrial processes, advanced SMR types like High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors (HTGRs) can deliver outlet temperatures of 750°C to 950°C. This higher temperature range opens up more opportunities for direct integration into high-temperature industrial processes, significantly reducing reliance on fossil fuels and decreasing associated carbon emissions.

5.2 Desalination

Water scarcity is a growing global concern, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. SMRs offer a compelling solution for large-scale, reliable, and cost-effective freshwater production through desalination processes. The combination of power and water production addresses two critical needs simultaneously.

• Process Integration: SMRs can be coupled with various desalination technologies:
  • Multi-Stage Flash (MSF) and Multi-Effect Distillation (MED): These thermal desalination methods require large amounts of low-grade heat or steam, which SMRs can provide directly as process heat, or electricity for pumping. This co-generation of electricity and heat significantly improves overall energy efficiency.
  • Reverse Osmosis (RO): RO is an electricity-intensive process. SMRs can provide the consistent, affordable electricity required to power RO plants, making freshwater production more economically viable.
• Advantages: The consistent and dispatchable nature of nuclear power ensures uninterrupted water production, which is vital for regions dependent on desalination. Furthermore, integrating desalination with nuclear power plants can reduce the overall environmental footprint compared to fossil fuel-powered desalination, contributing to enhanced sustainability and resilience of communities.

5.3 Hydrogen Production

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a critical energy carrier and feedstock for decarbonizing ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors such as heavy industry, long-haul transportation, and even for energy storage. SMRs can serve as a highly efficient and clean source of energy for large-scale hydrogen production.

• Methods of Production:
  • High-Temperature Electrolysis (HTE): This method uses heat and electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. SMRs, particularly HTGRs, are ideally suited for HTE due to their ability to provide both the high-temperature steam (thermal energy) and the electricity required, significantly reducing the electrical energy input compared to conventional electrolysis (which uses only electricity). This leads to much higher overall system efficiencies (potentially 50% or more, compared to 30-40% for conventional electrolysis).
  • Thermochemical Cycles: Advanced SMRs, especially HTGRs operating at very high temperatures (e.g., above 800°C), can drive thermochemical water-splitting cycles (e.g., Sulfur-Iodine cycle). These complex multi-step chemical processes produce hydrogen directly from water and heat, without the need for electricity, offering even higher theoretical efficiencies.
• Benefits: Nuclear-powered hydrogen production (often termed ‘pink hydrogen’ or ‘clean hydrogen’) offers a truly zero-carbon pathway to producing hydrogen at scale, overcoming the intermittency issues of renewable-powered hydrogen production and the carbon emissions of fossil fuel-based production (grey or blue hydrogen). This application supports the development of a hydrogen economy, contributing significantly to decarbonization efforts across various sectors.

5.4 District Heating

SMRs can be integrated into urban energy systems to provide reliable and efficient district heating. By supplying hot water or steam to a network of buildings, SMRs can displace fossil fuel-fired boilers, dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions from heating and cooling residential and commercial areas.

5.5 Remote Communities and Off-Grid Applications

Many remote communities, mining operations, or industrial sites rely on expensive and polluting diesel generators for their electricity. SMRs, particularly micro-reactors, offer a reliable, long-duration, and cost-effective alternative. Their compact size and long refueling intervals (some designs up to 10 years or more) make them ideal for isolated locations, enhancing energy independence and reducing logistical challenges associated with fuel transport.

The diverse application portfolio of SMRs highlights their potential to address not only electricity demands but also the crucial energy needs of various industrial and societal sectors, making them a powerful tool for comprehensive decarbonization and sustainable development.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Regulatory Pathways

The successful deployment of SMRs hinges critically on navigating complex and rigorous regulatory frameworks designed to ensure the highest standards of safety, security, and environmental protection throughout the lifecycle of nuclear facilities. While SMRs offer inherent safety advantages, their novel designs and modular construction approaches require a thorough and adaptive regulatory process.

6.1 Regulatory Frameworks in the UK

In the United Kingdom, the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) serves as the independent nuclear safety regulator, responsible for permitting and regulating nuclear facilities. Alongside the Environment Agency (EA) and Natural Resources Wales (NRW), which oversee environmental aspects, they ensure that nuclear designs meet stringent safety, security, and environmental protection standards. The primary regulatory pathway for new nuclear reactor designs in the UK is the Generic Design Assessment (GDA) process.

• Generic Design Assessment (GDA): The GDA process is a voluntary, multi-phase assessment of a nuclear reactor design, separate from any specific site licensing process. Its purpose is to identify and resolve any fundamental safety, security, and environmental issues at an early stage, long before any construction begins. The GDA is typically divided into four phases:
  • Phase 1 (Pre-assessment): Initial familiarization and assessment of the designer’s management system and submission plan.
  • Phase 2 (Detailed Assessment – Design Concepts): Focuses on the fundamental design concepts and safety arguments.
  • Phase 3 (Detailed Assessment – Design Details): Deep dive into the detailed design, safety analyses, and supporting evidence.
  • Phase 4 (Final Assessment and Statement of Design Acceptability – SoDA): Reviews all assessments and culminates in the ONR issuing a Statement of Design Acceptability (SoDA) if the design meets the UK’s regulatory requirements. The EA issues a Statement of Design Acceptability (SoDA) for environmental aspects. A SoDA indicates that the design is broadly acceptable for deployment in the UK, significantly de-risking the subsequent site-specific licensing process.

Rolls-Royce SMR has actively engaged with the ONR and EA through a GDA process. While the previous SMR GDA (for a different design) was paused, the current Rolls-Royce SMR design is undergoing a GDA-like pre-licensing process, aimed at preparing it for a formal GDA submission. This proactive engagement ensures that regulatory requirements are embedded early in the design phase, streamlining future licensing (Nuclear AMRC, n.d.). The UK regulators are also adapting their processes to account for the modularity and fleet-based deployment approach of SMRs, potentially allowing for ‘fleet licensing’ or expedited reviews for subsequent units of an approved design.

6.2 International Regulatory Harmonization and Collaboration

The global nature of SMR development and potential export markets necessitates international collaboration on regulatory standards and approaches. Harmonizing regulatory processes can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with licensing SMRs in multiple jurisdictions, facilitating their global deployment and promoting economies of scale.

• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): The IAEA plays a crucial role in promoting the safe, secure, and peaceful uses of nuclear technology worldwide. It develops safety standards, provides guidance documents, and facilitates international cooperation and information exchange on SMR regulation. The IAEA’s ‘SMR Regulators’ Forum’ is a key platform for regulators to discuss common challenges and best practices.
• Bilateral and Multilateral Agreements: Countries are increasingly engaging in bilateral agreements (e.g., between the U.S. NRC and Canadian CNSC) to share regulatory knowledge, align review processes, and potentially leverage each other’s assessments for specific SMR designs. This ‘multi-jurisdictional licensing’ approach seeks to avoid redundant reviews.
• Challenges in Harmonization: Despite efforts, challenges remain. National regulatory bodies retain ultimate authority over safety, and differences in national legal frameworks, safety philosophies, and licensing requirements can create hurdles. Additionally, novel SMR designs, particularly advanced non-LWRs (e.g., MSRs, HTGRs, FBRs), pose unique regulatory challenges due to their departure from established LWR operating experience and safety cases.

6.3 Public Acceptance and Engagement

Regulatory processes for SMRs are increasingly incorporating robust mechanisms for public engagement and transparency. Building public trust and acceptance is paramount for the successful deployment of any nuclear technology. This includes open communication about safety features, waste management strategies, and emergency preparedness plans. Regulators play a vital role in ensuring that design safety cases are communicated clearly and that public concerns are addressed effectively.

The regulatory journey for SMRs is evolving, aiming to balance stringent safety requirements with the need for efficient and predictable licensing pathways that enable timely deployment of these crucial clean energy technologies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Economic Viability and Role in the Future Energy Mix

The economic viability of SMRs is a critical determinant of their widespread adoption and their ultimate role in shaping the future global energy mix. Proponents argue that SMRs offer a compelling economic proposition, addressing many of the financial challenges that have plagued traditional large-scale nuclear projects.

7.1 Cost Competitiveness

While the per-kilowatt capital cost of the first-of-a-kind (FOAK) SMRs may initially be higher than highly optimized large-scale reactors, the long-term economic case for SMRs rests on several key factors:

• Lower Upfront Capital Costs: The absolute capital cost of a single SMR unit is significantly lower than that of a large-scale reactor. This makes financing more manageable and accessible to a broader range of investors, utilities, and even smaller energy companies. This reduced capital expenditure also lowers the financial risk for developers and governments.
• Modular Construction and Series Production: The shift to factory-based modular construction facilitates mass production and standardization. As more units are built, manufacturing processes become more efficient, leading to a ‘learning curve’ effect and subsequent reductions in per-unit capital costs. This contrasts sharply with the bespoke, site-specific nature of large nuclear builds. For example, the capital cost of certain advanced SMR designs, like the Stable Salt Reactor (SSR-W), has been projected to be significantly lower, potentially around $1,950/kW, compared to figures often exceeding $5,500/kW for large-scale nuclear plants (Wikipedia, Stable salt reactor, n.d.). While these are estimates, they highlight the potential for substantial cost reductions through advanced design and manufacturing.
• Shorter Construction Timelines: Reduced construction periods translate directly into lower interest costs during construction (IDC), which can represent a substantial portion of the total project cost for long-duration builds. Earlier commissioning also means earlier revenue generation, improving project economics.
• Financing Models: The smaller capital requirement and shorter build times for SMRs make them more amenable to conventional financing models typically used for large infrastructure projects, potentially reducing reliance on complex government guarantees or direct subsidies once the technology matures.
• Operational and Maintenance (O&M) Costs: While SMRs will have O&M costs, their simpler designs, longer refueling intervals, and potentially reduced staffing requirements (due to enhanced automation and passive safety) could lead to competitive operational expenditures over their long operating lifetimes (typically 60+ years).
• Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE): The LCOE, which considers all costs over a plant’s lifetime (capital, O&M, fuel, decommissioning) divided by electricity produced, is the ultimate metric for cost competitiveness. While initial FOAK SMRs might have higher LCOE due to design and licensing costs, proponents argue that subsequent units will achieve competitive LCOE values, comparable to or even lower than new large-scale nuclear, and competitive with other low-carbon dispatchable sources.

7.2 Integration with Renewable Energy Sources

SMRs possess unique characteristics that make them ideal complements to the increasing deployment of intermittent renewable energy sources (wind and solar) within modern electricity grids. This symbiotic relationship can significantly enhance grid stability and facilitate a robust transition to a low-carbon energy system.

• Capacity Firming and Dispatchability: Wind and solar power are inherently intermittent, relying on weather conditions. SMRs, as dispatchable and high-capacity factor sources, can provide consistent baseload power when renewables are not generating, or rapidly adjust their output to ‘firm’ the grid. This means they can compensate for fluctuations in renewable generation, ensuring a continuous and reliable power supply.
• Grid Stability and Ancillary Services: The ability of many SMR designs to load-follow (ramping power up and down) allows them to provide essential ancillary services, such as frequency regulation and voltage support. As grids incorporate more variable renewables, these services become critical for maintaining grid stability and preventing blackouts.
• Hybrid Energy Systems: SMRs can form the core of integrated hybrid energy systems, combining nuclear power with renewables and energy storage (e.g., batteries, hydrogen). Such systems can optimize energy production, minimize waste, and maximize efficiency, ensuring reliable power supply under all conditions.
• Grid Modernization: The distributed generation capability of SMRs allows them to be sited strategically at demand centers or on existing infrastructure, reducing transmission losses and enhancing grid resilience by decentralizing power sources. This is a key aspect of modernizing aging grid infrastructure.

7.3 Contribution to Decarbonization Goals and Energy Security

The deployment of SMRs aligns directly with global decarbonization objectives by offering a powerful, low-carbon alternative to fossil fuel-based power generation. Their versatility and scalability make them suitable for various applications, contributing to a diversified and resilient energy mix.

• Climate Change Mitigation: SMRs produce virtually no greenhouse gas emissions during operation, making them a vital tool in achieving ambitious net-zero targets. Their ability to provide consistent, carbon-free power for both electricity and industrial heat can significantly accelerate decarbonization across multiple sectors.
• Energy Security and Independence: By diversifying the energy mix and reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels, SMRs enhance national energy security. Their long operating cycles and domestic fuel supply chains (where applicable) provide greater resilience against geopolitical disruptions and price volatility in international energy markets.
• Economic Development and Job Creation: Investment in SMR technology can stimulate significant economic activity, creating high-skilled jobs in manufacturing, engineering, construction, and operations. The development of a domestic SMR industry, as envisioned in the UK, can foster industrial revitalization and export opportunities.
• Sustainable Development Goals: Beyond climate action, SMRs contribute to various United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), industry, innovation, and infrastructure (SDG 9), and partnerships for the goals (SDG 17).

In essence, SMRs are poised to play a transformative role in the future energy mix, not only by providing clean, reliable, and cost-competitive power but also by offering the flexibility and versatility required to integrate with a highly dynamic and increasingly decarbonized energy landscape.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Challenges and Considerations

Despite the significant promise of SMRs, their widespread deployment faces several complex challenges and considerations that must be diligently addressed for their full potential to be realized.

8.1 Public Perception and Acceptance

While SMRs are designed with enhanced safety features and a smaller footprint, public acceptance remains a critical hurdle for any nuclear technology. Concerns often revolve around:

• Safety: Despite passive safety designs, historical nuclear accidents (Chernobyl, Fukushima) have deeply impacted public trust. Clear and transparent communication about SMR safety, inherent design advantages, and emergency preparedness is paramount.
• Waste Management: The issue of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste remains a significant public concern. While SMRs generally produce less waste volume than traditional reactors due to their smaller size, and some advanced designs (e.g., FBRs, MSRs) offer potential for waste reduction or transmutation, long-term geological disposal solutions are still needed and require public confidence.
• ‘Not In My Backyard’ (NIMBY): Even with smaller footprints, siting new nuclear facilities can face local opposition due to perceived risks or impacts on property values.

Effective public engagement strategies, including education, transparency, and community benefits, are crucial to fostering acceptance.

8.2 Nuclear Proliferation Concerns

For certain advanced SMR designs, particularly those that use highly enriched uranium (HEU), or designs capable of ‘breeding’ new fissile material, proliferation risks must be carefully managed. International safeguards and robust non-proliferation regimes, such as those overseen by the IAEA, are vital to ensure that SMR technology is used exclusively for peaceful purposes. Designs with longer core lives, sealed cores, or those using low-enriched uranium (LEU) are generally seen as having a lower proliferation risk.

8.3 Supply Chain Development and Industrialization

While modular construction promises economies of scale, the robust manufacturing and construction infrastructure required for the mass production of SMR components and modules is not yet fully established. Building a specialized, high-quality nuclear supply chain capable of delivering multiple SMR units concurrently requires substantial investment, workforce training, and standardization. The industrial ramp-up from ‘first-of-a-kind’ to ‘N-th of a kind’ will present significant challenges.

8.4 Financing and Investment Hurdles

Despite lower absolute capital costs, securing financing for initial SMR projects can still be challenging. Investors often perceive nuclear projects as having high financial risks due to regulatory uncertainties, construction delays, and the novelty of first-of-a-kind technologies. Innovative financing mechanisms, government support (e.g., contracts for difference, loan guarantees), and robust risk-sharing frameworks will be essential to attract the necessary private capital for widespread SMR deployment.

8.5 Regulatory Harmonization and Timelines

While progress is being made in regulatory collaboration, significant differences persist across national regulatory frameworks. This can create delays and increase costs for SMR developers seeking to deploy their designs in multiple countries. Streamlining and harmonizing regulatory processes without compromising safety standards is a complex undertaking. The novelty of some advanced SMR designs also means that regulators need to develop new assessment methodologies and standards, which can be time-consuming.

8.6 Competition from Other Energy Sources

SMRs must compete in an increasingly diverse and competitive energy market. While they offer distinct advantages in dispatchability and load following, they face competition from rapidly deploying and often lower-cost renewable energy sources (wind, solar) and evolving energy storage technologies. The economic case for SMRs must demonstrate long-term competitiveness, especially in scenarios with low natural gas prices or declining renewable costs.

Addressing these challenges will require concerted effort from governments, industry, regulators, and the public, emphasizing collaboration, innovation, and transparent communication.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

9. Conclusion

Small Modular Reactors represent a truly transformative advancement in nuclear energy technology, offering a compelling array of advantages that position them as a pivotal component of the global clean energy transition. Their inherent modular construction, significantly reduced physical footprint, and advanced passive safety features address many of the historical impediments associated with traditional large-scale nuclear power plants, including protracted construction timelines, escalating capital costs, and complex regulatory challenges. Furthermore, the inherent flexibility and scalability of SMRs enable their seamless integration into evolving energy grids, providing essential firm, dispatchable power that complements the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources.

Beyond conventional electricity generation, SMRs are uniquely positioned to unlock vast decarbonization potential across a diverse range of sectors, providing high-temperature industrial heat for critical processes, enabling large-scale clean water production through desalination, and serving as an efficient, carbon-free source for the burgeoning hydrogen economy. These multifaceted applications underscore their versatility and their capacity to drive comprehensive emissions reductions beyond the electricity sector.

The United Kingdom’s proactive and strategic approach to SMR development, exemplified by the government’s steadfast commitment through initiatives like Great British Nuclear and substantial investment in the Rolls-Royce SMR consortium, firmly positions it at the forefront of this emerging sector. This national endeavor is driven by a dual imperative: to secure a resilient, low-carbon energy future for the UK and to revitalize its domestic nuclear supply chain, fostering economic growth and high-value job creation.

Globally, a diverse landscape of SMR designs and national strategies is rapidly advancing, with pioneering projects in countries such as the United States, Canada, China, and Russia demonstrating the technological maturity and commercial viability of various SMR concepts. However, the path to widespread SMR deployment is not without its challenges, including the imperative for continued regulatory harmonization, effective public engagement to build trust, the development of robust and scalable supply chains, and attractive financing mechanisms to de-risk early-stage projects.

As SMR technology continues to evolve and mature, propelled by ongoing innovation and international collaboration, it is unequivocally poised to play a significant and indeed indispensable role in the global transition towards a sustainable, secure, and profoundly low-carbon energy future. SMRs represent not merely an incremental improvement but a fundamental re-imagining of nuclear power, offering a timely and adaptable solution to meet the world’s escalating energy demands while simultaneously addressing the urgent climate crisis.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• BWRX-300. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BWRX-300
• GOV.UK. (2023). Rolls-Royce SMR selected to build small modular nuclear reactors. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/rolls-royce-smr-selected-to-build-small-modular-nuclear-reactors
• NuScale Power. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NuScale_Power
• Nuclear AMRC. (n.d.). Small modular reactors. Retrieved from https://www.nuclearamrc.co.uk/intelligence/smr/
• Stable salt reactor. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_salt_reactor
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (Various publications). Retrieved from https://www.iaea.org/
• World Nuclear Association (WNA). (Various publications). Retrieved from https://www.world-nuclear.org/
• UK Research and Innovation. (n.d.). Nuclear power: small is mighty. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/blog/voices-nuclear-power-small-is-mighty/
• El País. (2025). La UE marca el futuro nuclear para 2050 con vistas a su descarbonización. Retrieved from https://cincodias.elpais.com/extras/2025-07-12/la-ue-marca-el-futuro-nuclear-para-2050-con-vistas-a-su-descarbonizacion.html