
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NbS) represent a paradigm shift in sustainable water management, moving beyond conventional engineering to harness the intrinsic capacities of natural ecosystems. This comprehensive report meticulously explores the diverse typologies of NbS applicable to water management, elucidating their underlying ecological principles and the sophisticated mechanisms through which they function. It rigorously evaluates their efficacy in treating a broad spectrum of pollutants, from nutrients and pathogens to heavy metals and emerging contaminants. Furthermore, the report details the myriad co-benefits associated with NbS, including enhanced biodiversity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and improvements in human well-being and economic viability. A thorough assessment of their cost-effectiveness is provided, alongside critical design considerations essential for successful implementation. Drawing upon a global array of exemplary case studies, the report offers profound insights into the practical application, long-term performance, and socio-environmental outcomes of NbS, concluding with an examination of prevailing challenges and future opportunities for widespread adoption.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
1. Introduction: The Imperative for Nature-Based Water Solutions
The accelerating pace of global change, characterized by unprecedented pressures on water resources, necessitates a fundamental rethinking of water management paradigms. The interconnected crises of water scarcity, pervasive pollution, intensifying flood risks, and the overarching impacts of climate change pose formidable challenges that traditional, grey infrastructure solutions are increasingly ill-equipped to address sustainably or comprehensively. Conventional approaches, often characterized by centralized, hard-engineered structures like large dams, extensive pipe networks, and chemical treatment plants, frequently entail significant environmental footprints, high operational costs, and limited adaptability to dynamic environmental conditions. Moreover, they often fail to deliver the broader ecological and social co-benefits essential for genuine sustainability.
In this context, nature-based solutions (NbS) have emerged as a critically important and increasingly recognized strategic approach. NbS leverage the inherent processes and functions of natural and modified ecosystems to provide sustainable water management services, concurrently delivering biodiversity benefits and supporting human well-being. The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) defines NbS as ‘actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore natural or modified ecosystems, which address societal challenges effectively and adaptively, simultaneously providing human well-being and biodiversity benefits’ (IUCN, n.d.). This holistic definition underscores their multifaceted utility, extending beyond mere technical fixes to embrace systemic environmental and social resilience.
NbS encompass a diverse array of interventions, ranging from the restoration of degraded natural ecosystems such as wetlands, forests, and floodplains, to the strategic integration of natural processes into human-dominated landscapes, such as urban green infrastructure. Their fundamental premise lies in working with nature, rather than against it, to manage water resources. This report delves into the intricate details of various NbS applications in water management, exploring their ecological underpinnings, empirical effectiveness, comprehensive co-benefits, economic viability, and the critical design and implementation considerations that dictate their success. Through a detailed analysis of global case studies, it aims to provide a robust understanding of how NbS can form the cornerstone of future-proof, integrated water management strategies.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
2. Typologies of Nature-Based Solutions in Water Management
NbS manifest in a variety of forms, each tailored to specific hydrological contexts and water management objectives. While diverse in their application, they share the common goal of harnessing ecological processes to deliver water-related services.
2.1 Constructed Wetlands
Constructed wetlands (CWs) are meticulously engineered systems designed to mimic the pollutant removal functions of natural wetlands. They are deliberately created terrestrial or aquatic environments that utilize natural processes involving vegetation, soil (or other media), and microbial assemblages to treat wastewater, stormwater runoff, agricultural effluents, or even industrial discharges. The efficacy of CWs stems from a complex interplay of physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms that collectively facilitate contaminant attenuation.
Key types of constructed wetlands include:
-
Free Water Surface (FWS) Wetlands: These systems closely resemble natural marshes, featuring a shallow water column flowing over a substrate (often soil) with emergent vegetation (e.g., cattails, reeds). Pollutant removal occurs through sedimentation, filtration, adsorption, plant uptake, and microbial degradation in both aerobic and anaerobic zones. FWS wetlands are aesthetically appealing and provide significant habitat for wildlife, but they require substantial land area and can be prone to evaporative losses and mosquito breeding.
-
Subsurface Flow (SSF) Wetlands: In SSF wetlands, wastewater flows horizontally or vertically through a porous media bed (e.g., gravel, sand, crushed rock) planted with emergent macrophytes. The water surface remains below the media surface, minimizing odors and vector issues. They are highly efficient due to a larger specific surface area for microbial growth and longer hydraulic residence times. SSF wetlands are further categorized:
- Horizontal Subsurface Flow (HSSF) Wetlands: Water flows horizontally through the bed. These are effective for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended solids removal, and to some extent, nitrogen. Oxygen transfer can be a limiting factor for nitrification.
- Vertical Flow (VF) Wetlands: Wastewater is intermittently dosed onto the surface of a sand or gravel bed, allowing it to percolate vertically. This design promotes alternating aerobic and anaerobic conditions, which is highly advantageous for nitrogen removal (nitrification and denitrification). VF wetlands generally achieve superior oxygen transfer and pathogen removal compared to HSSF systems.
-
Hybrid Systems: Recognizing the complementary strengths of different wetland types, hybrid systems combine FWS, HSSF, and/or VF configurations in series or parallel. For instance, a VF wetland followed by an HSSF wetland can achieve very high levels of treatment, particularly for nitrogen, by optimizing conditions for both nitrification and denitrification. This approach enhances overall treatment efficiency and robustness.
Pollutant removal mechanisms in CWs are multifaceted: Physical processes include sedimentation of suspended solids, filtration by the media bed and root systems, and adsorption onto particle surfaces. Chemical processes involve precipitation (e.g., phosphorus with iron or calcium), chemical oxidation-reduction reactions, and ion exchange. Biological processes are arguably the most critical, driven by a vast community of microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, protozoa) that metabolize organic matter (BOD removal), convert nitrogen compounds (nitrification-denitrification), and degrade various organic pollutants. Plants play a vital role by providing surface area for microbial attachment, oxygenating the rhizosphere (root zone), taking up nutrients and some heavy metals, and facilitating evapotranspiration.
2.2 Riparian Buffers
Riparian buffers are vegetated strips of land situated adjacent to rivers, streams, lakes, and other water bodies. They are strategically designed and managed to provide a critical interface between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Their primary functions in water management revolve around filtering runoff, stabilizing streambanks, and maintaining the ecological integrity of aquatic habitats.
A typical riparian buffer zone often consists of multiple sections:
- Zone 1 (Streambank Stabilization): The immediate area closest to the water, typically consisting of native trees and shrubs with deep, fibrous root systems that stabilize banks, prevent erosion, and provide shade to regulate water temperature, which is crucial for aquatic life like fish.
- Zone 2 (Managed Forest/Shrub): A wider zone of native trees and shrubs that provides an additional barrier to runoff, enhances wildlife habitat, and contributes to carbon sequestration.
- Zone 3 (Grassed Filter Strip): The outermost zone, composed of dense grasses, designed to slow down surface runoff from adjacent agricultural fields or urban areas, allowing suspended sediments and particulate pollutants to settle out before reaching the forested zones or the water body itself.
The effectiveness of riparian buffers stems from their ability to:
- Filter Pollutants: As surface runoff moves through the buffer, vegetation and leaf litter physically filter out sediments and particulate matter. Plant roots and soil microbes absorb dissolved nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and some pesticides, preventing their entry into the water body. Denitrification, the conversion of nitrate to nitrogen gas by anaerobic bacteria, is a particularly important process in saturated zones within the buffer.
- Stabilize Banks and Reduce Erosion: The extensive root systems of trees and shrubs bind soil particles, significantly increasing bank stability and reducing the erosion caused by water flow, especially during high-flow events. This minimizes sediment loading in the water, which can impair aquatic habitats and water quality.
- Regulate Water Temperature: Shade provided by trees reduces solar radiation reaching the water surface, moderating water temperatures. Cooler water holds more dissolved oxygen, which is vital for many aquatic species.
- Enhance Biodiversity: Riparian corridors serve as critical habitats and migration pathways for a diverse array of terrestrial and aquatic species, contributing significantly to regional biodiversity.
- Recharge Groundwater: The vegetation and permeable soils in riparian buffers promote infiltration of surface water, contributing to groundwater recharge and maintaining base flows in streams.
2.3 Green Infrastructure
Green Infrastructure (GI) refers to a strategically planned and managed network of natural and semi-natural areas that delivers a wide range of ecosystem services. In an urban context, GI integrates natural systems into the built environment to provide functional and aesthetic benefits, with a strong emphasis on stormwater management. Unlike traditional grey infrastructure (e.g., pipes, concrete channels), GI uses vegetation, soils, and natural processes to manage water where it falls, reducing runoff volumes and improving water quality. It also offers a multitude of co-benefits, making cities more resilient, livable, and sustainable.
Key components of urban Green Infrastructure for water management include:
-
Green Roofs (Vegetated Roofs): These are building rooftops partially or completely covered with vegetation and a growing medium, planted over a waterproof membrane. They come in two main types: extensive (shallow substrate, low maintenance plants) and intensive (deeper substrate, more diverse planting, often accessible). Green roofs effectively retain a significant portion of rainfall, reducing stormwater runoff volume and delaying peak flows. They also filter pollutants, reduce the urban heat island effect, improve building insulation, and provide urban green space and habitat.
-
Rain Gardens and Bioretention Systems: These are shallow depressions planted with native vegetation designed to collect and absorb stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces like roofs, driveways, and parking lots. They typically consist of a layered profile of engineered soil media, an underdrain system (optional), and an organic mulch layer. Pollutant removal occurs through infiltration, filtration by soil media, adsorption, plant uptake, and microbial degradation. They are highly effective in removing suspended solids, nutrients, and some heavy metals.
-
Permeable Pavements (Pervious Pavement): These are surfaces that allow stormwater to infiltrate through the pavement structure into an underlying aggregate reservoir, rather than running off. Common types include pervious concrete, porous asphalt, and permeable interlocking concrete pavers. By allowing water to percolate into the ground, permeable pavements reduce runoff volumes, replenish groundwater, and filter pollutants as water passes through the aggregate layers, thereby improving water quality. They are particularly valuable in high-density urban areas where space for other GI elements is limited.
-
Urban Forests and Street Trees: Trees within urban settings play a crucial role in the urban water cycle. Their canopies intercept rainfall, reducing the volume of water hitting impervious surfaces. Water stored on leaves and branches is then evaporated back into the atmosphere (interception loss). Trees also absorb water from the soil and release it through evapotranspiration, further reducing soil moisture content and increasing the soil’s capacity to absorb subsequent rainfall. Their root systems enhance soil structure, increasing infiltration rates and reducing compaction. Urban forests also contribute to air quality improvement, urban cooling, and aesthetic appeal.
-
Swales and Bioswales: Swales are vegetated, shallow, open channels designed to convey stormwater runoff slowly, allowing for infiltration and filtration. Bioswales are an enhanced form, incorporating engineered soil media and dense vegetation to improve pollutant removal and promote infiltration more actively than simple swales. They are effective in treating road runoff and preventing pollutants from reaching storm drains and receiving waters.
-
Detention and Retention Ponds (Naturalized): While traditional stormwater ponds are often grey infrastructure, their naturalization transforms them into NbS. Naturalized detention ponds temporarily hold stormwater, releasing it slowly, while naturalized retention ponds maintain a permanent pool of water. Both can be designed with vegetated edges, diverse planting, and varied depths to maximize pollutant removal through sedimentation, biological uptake, and microbial degradation, while also providing valuable urban habitat and recreational amenities.
2.4 Natural Floodplain and River Restoration
Beyond urban settings, restoring natural floodplains and riverine ecosystems is a significant NbS. This involves re-establishing the natural hydrological connectivity between rivers and their floodplains, often by removing or setting back artificial levees, restoring meanders, and re-vegetating riparian zones. By allowing rivers to access their floodplains during high-flow events, these solutions:
- Increase Water Storage Capacity: Floodplains act as natural sponges, absorbing excess water and reducing peak flows downstream, thereby mitigating flood risks.
- Improve Water Quality: Slower water movement across floodplains allows for sedimentation of suspended solids and biological processing of nutrients and other pollutants.
- Enhance Biodiversity: Restored floodplains create diverse habitats for aquatic and terrestrial species, re-establishing critical ecological corridors.
- Replenish Groundwater: Infiltration on the floodplain contributes to aquifer recharge.
2.5 Coastal and Marine Ecosystems
While often categorized under coastal protection, coastal ecosystems like mangroves, salt marshes, and oyster reefs play critical roles in water management by influencing water quality and mitigating coastal hazards. They serve as natural filters, trapping sediments and absorbing excess nutrients from terrestrial runoff before it reaches open marine waters. This significantly improves coastal water clarity and reduces risks of algal blooms. Furthermore, these ecosystems absorb wave energy, stabilize shorelines, and reduce storm surge impacts, thereby protecting coastal communities and infrastructure from flooding and erosion (Temmerman et al., 2013).
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
3. Ecological Principles Underpinning Nature-Based Solutions
The efficacy of NbS is rooted in fundamental ecological principles, harnessing the complexity and resilience of natural systems to deliver sustainable services. Understanding these principles is crucial for designing, implementing, and managing NbS effectively.
3.1 Bioremediation
Bioremediation is the process of using living organisms—primarily microorganisms (bacteria, fungi) and plants—to degrade, detoxify, or immobilize environmental contaminants. In the context of NbS for water management, bioremediation is a cornerstone mechanism.
- Microbial Degradation: Bacteria and fungi possess diverse metabolic pathways that allow them to break down a wide range of organic pollutants (e.g., hydrocarbons, pesticides, pharmaceuticals) into less harmful substances, often carbon dioxide and water. In wetlands and bioretention systems, large and diverse microbial communities thrive in the saturated and unsaturated zones, facilitated by plant root exudates which provide carbon sources. These microbes perform critical transformations, such as the nitrification-denitrification cycle for nitrogen removal, where ammonia is first oxidized to nitrate (nitrification, aerobic conditions) and then reduced to nitrogen gas (denitrification, anaerobic conditions).
- Phytoremediation: This sub-discipline of bioremediation utilizes plants to remove, degrade, or contain contaminants. Various phytoremediation mechanisms are employed in NbS:
- Phytoextraction: Plants absorb contaminants (e.g., heavy metals) through their roots and translocate them to shoots. The plant biomass can then be harvested and safely disposed of.
- Phytostabilization: Plants immobilize contaminants in the soil or substrate, preventing their leaching into water. This can involve root exudates altering soil pH, or the contaminants binding to root surfaces.
- Rhizofiltration: Plant roots absorb or adsorb contaminants directly from contaminated water, as seen in floating treatment wetlands or some constructed wetlands.
- Phytovolatilization: Plants absorb contaminants and release them into the atmosphere as volatile compounds (less common for water treatment).
- Phytodegradation: Plants directly metabolize and break down organic contaminants within their tissues.
The selection of appropriate plant species (e.g., hyperaccumulators for specific heavy metals) and the maintenance of conditions favorable for microbial activity (e.g., appropriate redox potential, temperature, pH) are critical for optimizing bioremediation processes in NbS.
3.2 Hydrological Regulation
NbS are fundamentally about restoring or mimicking natural hydrological processes to manage water quantity and timing. This encompasses a suite of mechanisms that collectively regulate water flow and storage within a landscape.
- Interception: The capture and temporary storage of rainfall by vegetation canopies. Urban trees and green roofs are highly effective at intercepting precipitation, reducing the volume of water that directly reaches impervious surfaces and consequently, the amount of stormwater runoff.
- Infiltration: The process by which water penetrates the ground surface and moves downward into the soil. Permeable pavements, rain gardens, bioswales, and restored floodplains significantly enhance infiltration rates, allowing more water to soak into the ground rather than becoming surface runoff. This reduces immediate flood risk and replenishes soil moisture and groundwater.
- Evapotranspiration (ET): The combined process of evaporation from water surfaces and soil, and transpiration from plants. Plants in NbS actively draw water from the soil and release it as vapor into the atmosphere. This process effectively removes water from the system, reducing water volumes, and contributing to urban cooling. The higher the vegetation density and healthy soil, the greater the ET potential.
- Flow Attenuation and Storage: Wetlands, naturalized detention ponds, and restored floodplains provide temporary storage for large volumes of water during peak rainfall events. By slowing down and storing water, they reduce the peak flow rate of runoff, delaying its arrival downstream and thereby mitigating downstream flood risks. This effectively spreads the hydrological impact over a longer period, reducing the strain on drainage infrastructure.
- Groundwater Recharge: Enhanced infiltration through NbS directly contributes to the replenishment of aquifers. This is crucial for maintaining groundwater levels, which are vital for baseflow in rivers, supporting ecosystems, and providing a stable water source for human consumption, especially during dry periods.
3.3 Biodiversity Enhancement
One of the defining characteristics of NbS, distinguishing them from purely engineering solutions, is their inherent capacity to enhance biodiversity. By creating, restoring, or improving natural habitats, NbS provide ecological niches for a wide array of species, contributing to broader ecosystem health and resilience.
- Habitat Creation: Constructed wetlands, restored floodplains, green roofs, and urban forests provide diverse habitats for various flora and fauna. Wetlands, for instance, are critical breeding grounds and migratory stopovers for birds, amphibians, and insects. Urban green spaces offer refuge for pollinators, small mammals, and native plant species.
- Ecological Connectivity: NbS can act as ecological corridors, linking fragmented habitats within urban or agricultural landscapes. Riparian buffers, in particular, serve as vital pathways for wildlife movement along waterways, reducing habitat isolation and promoting gene flow.
- Ecosystem Services Beyond Water: Enhanced biodiversity leads to a wider range of ecosystem services, including pollination, pest control, soil formation, and increased ecosystem resilience to disturbances like climate change impacts. A more biodiverse system is generally more robust and better equipped to provide long-term services.
- Genetic Diversity and Resilience: Promoting native plant species within NbS not only supports local biodiversity but also ensures that the plants are well-adapted to the local climate and conditions, enhancing the long-term resilience and functionality of the NbS itself.
3.4 Soil Health Improvement
Many NbS, particularly those involving vegetated surfaces (e.g., rain gardens, urban forests, restored floodplains), significantly improve soil health. Healthy soils are fundamental to effective water management.
- Increased Organic Matter: Vegetation adds organic matter to the soil through root growth and decomposition of plant litter. Organic matter improves soil structure, increases water holding capacity, and enhances nutrient cycling.
- Improved Infiltration and Aeration: Plant roots create macropores in the soil, improving its porosity and allowing water and air to penetrate more easily. This reduces compaction and increases infiltration rates, preventing surface runoff.
- Enhanced Microbial Activity: Healthy soils support diverse microbial communities that are essential for nutrient cycling, pollutant degradation, and overall soil fertility. These microbes are key to the bioremediation functions of many NbS.
- Erosion Control: Robust vegetation and improved soil structure reduce soil erosion, minimizing sediment transport into water bodies and preserving soil fertility.
By integrating these ecological principles, NbS offer a holistic and adaptive approach to water management, delivering synergistic benefits that extend far beyond their primary function.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
4. Effectiveness in Treating Diverse Pollutants
One of the most compelling aspects of NbS is their demonstrated effectiveness in treating a wide array of water pollutants, often achieving comparable or superior results to conventional methods, but with added environmental benefits.
4.1 Nutrient Removal
Excessive nutrient loading, primarily nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), from agricultural runoff, wastewater discharges, and urban stormwater, leads to eutrophication in receiving waters. NbS, particularly constructed wetlands and riparian buffers, are highly effective in mitigating this issue.
- Nitrogen Removal: The primary mechanism for nitrogen removal in CWs and riparian buffers is the coupled process of nitrification-denitrification. Nitrification, the aerobic conversion of ammonia (NH₄⁺) to nitrate (NO₃⁻) by nitrifying bacteria, requires oxygen, typically provided in the water column of FWS wetlands, aerated zones, or through intermittent dosing in VF wetlands. Denitrification, the anaerobic conversion of nitrate to inert nitrogen gas (N₂), occurs in anoxic or anaerobic zones (e.g., saturated soil layers, deeper media in SSF wetlands, or sediments). Plant uptake also removes a portion of nitrogen, especially during the active growing season, incorporating it into biomass. The efficiency of nitrogen removal can range from 50% to over 90%, depending on the system design, hydraulic loading rate, temperature, and carbon availability for denitrification (Kadlec & Wallace, 2009).
- Phosphorus Removal: Phosphorus removal is primarily achieved through adsorption, precipitation, and plant uptake. Adsorption occurs when phosphate ions bind to the surfaces of substrate materials (e.g., sand, gravel, clay minerals, iron and aluminum oxides). Precipitation involves the formation of insoluble phosphorus compounds with cations like calcium, iron, or aluminum. Plant uptake is significant but can be limited by the plants’ capacity to store P. Substrates rich in iron, aluminum, or calcium, or specially engineered reactive media, can significantly enhance phosphorus removal. Removal efficiencies typically range from 40% to 80% but can vary widely based on influent concentration, hydraulic retention time, and substrate type.
4.2 Pathogen Reduction
NbS contribute significantly to reducing pathogens (bacteria, viruses, protozoa) from contaminated water sources. While not typically designed for complete disinfection, they offer substantial attenuation, reducing health risks associated with water reuse or discharge.
- Physical Processes: Filtration through the soil or media bed (in SSF wetlands, rain gardens) physically removes larger pathogens and suspended solids to which pathogens may be attached. Sedimentation in FWS wetlands and detention basins allows pathogens to settle out of the water column.
- Biological Processes: Predation by protozoa and other microorganisms, competition for resources, and the production of antagonistic compounds by plants and microbes contribute to pathogen die-off. Longer hydraulic retention times increase contact time with the biological environment, enhancing removal.
- Environmental Stressors: Exposure to UV radiation from sunlight (especially in FWS wetlands), fluctuating temperatures, and unfavorable pH conditions contribute to pathogen inactivation. Subsurface flow wetlands generally exhibit higher pathogen removal rates than FWS wetlands due to greater physical filtration and protection from UV radiation (which can lead to regrowth in surface waters).
Removal efficiencies for fecal coliforms or E. coli often exceed 90-99% in well-designed CWs, making the effluent suitable for certain non-potable reuse applications (e.g., irrigation).
4.3 Heavy Metal Removal
Heavy metals (e.g., lead, cadmium, zinc, copper, chromium) are persistent pollutants that can be highly toxic. Certain NbS, particularly constructed wetlands and bioretention systems, demonstrate considerable capacity for their removal.
- Adsorption and Ion Exchange: Heavy metal ions readily adsorb onto the surfaces of soil particles, organic matter, and various media (e.g., iron oxides, manganese oxides, clay minerals) within the NbS. Cation exchange capacity of the substrate is a key factor.
- Precipitation: Under specific pH and redox conditions, heavy metals can precipitate as insoluble compounds (e.g., sulfides, hydroxides, carbonates), effectively removing them from the water column and immobilizing them in the substrate.
- Phytoremediation: Plants contribute to heavy metal removal through phytoextraction (uptake and accumulation in biomass), phytostabilization (immobilization in the rhizosphere), and rhizofiltration. The selection of hyperaccumulator plant species is crucial for optimizing phytoextraction. However, the accumulation of metals in plant biomass necessitates careful management of harvested plant material to prevent secondary pollution.
- Complexation: Heavy metals can form complexes with organic ligands, reducing their bioavailability or mobility.
Effectiveness varies widely depending on the specific metal, its chemical form, concentration, pH, redox conditions, and the characteristics of the substrate and plant species. Generally, removal efficiencies can range from 50% to over 95% for certain metals (Vymazal, 2011).
4.4 Sediment and Suspended Solids Removal
Sediments and suspended solids are ubiquitous pollutants in stormwater runoff and wastewater, contributing to turbidity, carrying other pollutants (e.g., phosphorus, heavy metals, pathogens), and degrading aquatic habitats. Nearly all types of NbS that manage surface water effectively remove these pollutants.
- Physical Filtration: Vegetated filter strips, rain gardens, bioswales, and constructed wetlands physically filter out suspended particles as water flows through the vegetation and soil media.
- Sedimentation: The slowing of water velocity within vegetated systems (e.g., FWS wetlands, detention basins, grassed swales) allows heavier suspended particles to settle out due to gravity.
Removal efficiencies for total suspended solids (TSS) are consistently high, often exceeding 80-95%, which is critical for improving water clarity and reducing pollutant transport.
4.5 Organic Pollutants and Emerging Contaminants
While more challenging, NbS can also contribute to the degradation or removal of complex organic pollutants, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products (PPCPs), and other emerging contaminants (ECs).
- Microbial Degradation: Specialized microbial communities in the aerobic and anaerobic zones of wetlands and bioretention systems can biodegrade many organic compounds. This process is influenced by residence time, temperature, and the presence of co-metabolites.
- Adsorption: Many organic pollutants can sorb onto organic matter or other components of the soil media. This physically removes them from the water phase, although it can lead to accumulation in the substrate.
- Phytodegradation and Phytovolatilization: Certain plants can take up and metabolize organic compounds, or even volatilize them into the atmosphere.
- Photodegradation: For surface flow systems, exposure to sunlight can lead to the photochemical degradation of some compounds.
The effectiveness for ECs is highly variable and often lower than for conventional pollutants, requiring more research and potentially specialized design features (e.g., enhanced aerobic zones, specific media) for improved removal.
In summary, the multi-mechanism approach of NbS provides a robust and adaptive means of treating a broad spectrum of water pollutants, making them an indispensable tool in contemporary water quality management.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
5. Co-Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions
The appeal and growing adoption of NbS stem not only from their primary function in water management but equally from the extensive array of co-benefits they deliver. These synergistic benefits contribute to environmental sustainability, economic viability, and enhanced human well-being, often exceeding the scope of traditional grey infrastructure solutions.
5.1 Biodiversity Enhancement
As discussed under ecological principles, NbS inherently contribute to biodiversity. Constructed wetlands, for example, serve as vital habitats for a diverse range of flora and fauna, including migratory birds, amphibians, insects, and native plant species. The Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary in California is a testament to this, having transformed a municipal wastewater treatment facility into a thriving ecosystem that supports over 300 bird species, while simultaneously treating wastewater (Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary, n.d.). Urban green infrastructure, such as green roofs, rain gardens, and urban forests, create ecological stepping stones within fragmented urban landscapes, supporting pollinators (bees, butterflies), small mammals, and enhancing overall urban biodiversity. Riparian buffers provide critical connectivity for wildlife along waterways, serving as corridors for movement and genetic exchange.
5.2 Flood Management and Climate Resilience
NbS play a critical role in mitigating flood risks by altering hydrological pathways and increasing the landscape’s capacity to manage water. This is particularly crucial in the context of increasing frequency and intensity of extreme rainfall events due to climate change.
- Reduced Peak Flows and Runoff Volumes: Green roofs intercept rainfall; permeable pavements and rain gardens facilitate infiltration, reducing surface runoff. Naturalized detention basins and restored floodplains temporarily store large volumes of water during storm events, effectively attenuating peak flows downstream and reducing the burden on conventional drainage systems.
- Increased Storage Capacity: Floodplain restoration and wetland creation increase the natural storage capacity of landscapes, acting as natural sponges that absorb excess water and release it slowly. This not only mitigates flooding in the immediate vicinity but also reduces flood levels further downstream.
- Enhanced Urban Resilience: Concepts like ‘Sponge Cities’ in China, which integrate various green infrastructure elements, exemplify how NbS can transform urban landscapes into permeable, water-absorbing systems, dramatically reducing urban flooding (Sponge City, n.d.). The Benjakitti Forest Park in Bangkok, Thailand, serves as a compelling example. Designed to absorb up to 200,000 cubic meters of water, the park effectively mitigated flooding during a significant rainfall event in 2022, demonstrating the practical efficacy of large-scale urban NbS for flood management (Time, 2024).
5.3 Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation
NbS offer significant contributions to both mitigating the causes of climate change and adapting to its inevitable impacts.
- Climate Change Mitigation: NbS, particularly those involving vegetation, sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) through photosynthesis, storing it in plant biomass (above-ground and roots) and soil organic matter. Urban forests, restored wetlands, and coastal ecosystems like mangroves are significant carbon sinks. Furthermore, by reducing the urban heat island effect (see below), green infrastructure can decrease the demand for air conditioning, leading to reduced energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions.
- Climate Change Adaptation: NbS enhance the adaptive capacity of human settlements and ecosystems to climate impacts. Urban forests and green roofs provide natural cooling, mitigating extreme heat events and reducing heat-related illnesses. Restored coastal wetlands and mangroves provide natural defenses against rising sea levels and intensified storm surges. By improving water infiltration and groundwater recharge, NbS enhance water security, making communities more resilient to droughts and water scarcity.
5.4 Improved Human Health and Well-being
The integration of nature into urban and peri-urban environments through NbS offers substantial benefits for human health and quality of life.
- Mental and Physical Health: Access to green spaces has been linked to reduced stress, improved mental health, and increased opportunities for physical activity. Parks, green corridors, and naturalized water bodies created through NbS provide recreational spaces for walking, cycling, and relaxation.
- Air Quality Improvement: Trees and vegetation in urban NbS intercept air pollutants (particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide) and absorb gaseous pollutants, leading to improved urban air quality.
- Reduced Urban Heat Island Effect: Green roofs, urban forests, and permeable surfaces reduce ambient air temperatures through shading and evapotranspiration, mitigating the urban heat island effect and reducing heat-related health risks.
- Noise Reduction: Vegetation can act as a natural sound buffer, reducing noise pollution in urban areas.
- Enhanced Aesthetics and Community Engagement: NbS often transform drab grey spaces into vibrant, aesthetically pleasing natural areas, fostering a sense of community pride and providing spaces for social interaction and environmental education.
5.5 Economic Benefits
While initial perceptions may focus on the costs of NbS, a comprehensive analysis reveals significant economic advantages over their life cycle.
- Cost-Effectiveness: NbS can be more cost-effective than traditional grey infrastructure in the long run, particularly when considering the full spectrum of co-benefits and life-cycle costs (see Section 6.1). They can reduce the need for expensive upgrades to conventional drainage systems or wastewater treatment plants.
- Increased Property Values: Proximity to green spaces and well-managed natural areas often leads to increased property values.
- Job Creation: The design, installation, and maintenance of NbS create green jobs in landscape architecture, ecological restoration, horticulture, and environmental engineering.
- Tourism and Recreation: Attractive green infrastructure and healthy ecosystems can boost local tourism and recreational economies.
- Reduced Infrastructure Damage: By mitigating floods and erosion, NbS protect existing infrastructure from damage, reducing repair and replacement costs.
- Improved Water Security: By enhancing water quality and contributing to groundwater recharge, NbS can reduce treatment costs for drinking water and ensure more reliable water supplies, thereby supporting economic activities dependent on water.
These multifaceted co-benefits underscore the holistic value proposition of NbS, positioning them not merely as technical solutions but as foundational investments in sustainable development and resilient communities.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
6. Cost-Effectiveness and Design Considerations
The successful implementation and widespread adoption of NbS hinge on a thorough understanding of their economic viability and meticulous attention to design principles.
6.1 Cost-Effectiveness Assessment
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of NbS requires a comprehensive life-cycle approach that considers not only upfront capital costs but also long-term operational and maintenance expenses, and crucially, the monetary value of the ecosystem services and co-benefits they provide. Traditional cost-benefit analyses often undervalue NbS by focusing solely on direct water management outcomes, neglecting the broader environmental, social, and economic advantages.
- Capital Costs: Initial investment for NbS can vary widely. For instance, large-scale wetland creation or floodplain restoration might require significant land acquisition and earthworks. Urban green infrastructure like green roofs or permeable pavements can have higher initial installation costs compared to conventional impervious surfaces. However, these costs are often offset by reduced expenditures on stormwater pipes, pumps, and treatment facilities, or by deferred investments in grey infrastructure upgrades.
- Operational and Maintenance (O&M) Costs: NbS generally exhibit lower long-term O&M costs compared to traditional grey infrastructure, which often requires energy-intensive pumping, chemical dosing, and frequent mechanical repairs. For NbS, O&M typically involves vegetation management (pruning, weeding, replanting), sediment removal, and system monitoring. While labor-intensive, these tasks can be less costly and more adaptable over time. For example, a study assessing constructed wetlands in Italy found that both vertical subsurface flow and surface flow wetlands provided a positive benefit-cost ratio, indicating economic viability. The vertical subsurface flow system in Sicily, for example, achieved a benefit-cost ratio of 4 when considering ecosystem services (Garcia-Herrero et al., 2023).
- Valuing Co-Benefits (Ecosystem Services Valuation): The true economic value of NbS emerges when co-benefits are monetized. This involves assigning a monetary value to services such as flood damage reduction, improved air quality, enhanced recreational opportunities, increased property values, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity conservation. For instance, preventing flood damage to property and infrastructure represents a tangible economic saving. The health benefits derived from improved air quality and access to green spaces can reduce healthcare costs. While valuing ecosystem services can be complex and requires specialized methodologies (e.g., contingent valuation, hedonic pricing), it is essential for a holistic cost-benefit analysis that accurately reflects the full societal return on investment from NbS.
- Comparison with Grey Infrastructure: Studies frequently demonstrate that, when co-benefits are factored in, NbS can be more cost-effective over their operational lifespan than grey infrastructure, especially for distributed stormwater management. For example, cities like Portland, Oregon, have found that green infrastructure solutions for stormwater management can be 10-50% cheaper than traditional pipe-and-pump systems over a 20-year lifespan, while also delivering multiple co-benefits that grey infrastructure cannot (City of Portland, 2017).
6.2 Design Considerations
Effective design is paramount to the successful performance, longevity, and multi-functional delivery of NbS. It requires an interdisciplinary approach, integrating ecological, hydrological, engineering, landscape architecture, and social sciences.
-
Site-Specific Assessment: A thorough understanding of the local context is fundamental. This includes detailed analysis of:
- Hydrology: Rainfall patterns, runoff volumes, peak flow rates, existing drainage networks, groundwater levels, and water table fluctuations. This informs sizing and hydraulic design.
- Geology and Soil Characteristics: Soil type, permeability, infiltration rates, presence of bedrock or restrictive layers, and nutrient content. This dictates the choice of media and potential for infiltration.
- Topography: Slope, elevation, and natural drainage paths influence water movement and system layout.
- Climate: Temperature, evapotranspiration rates, solar radiation, and wind patterns affect plant selection and water balance.
- Existing Land Use and Constraints: Space availability, presence of underground utilities, property boundaries, and regulatory zoning.
- Social and Cultural Context: Community needs, aesthetic preferences, public access requirements, and potential for educational engagement.
-
Hydrological Sizing and Modelling: Accurate sizing of NbS components (e.g., wetland area, rain garden volume, permeable pavement extent) is crucial to manage anticipated runoff volumes and achieve desired hydraulic residence times. Hydrological modeling tools are often employed to simulate different storm events and assess the performance of proposed designs under various scenarios.
-
Species Selection: The choice of plant species is critical for both functionality and resilience. Plants should be:
- Native and Locally Adapted: To ensure resilience, reduce maintenance needs, and support local biodiversity.
- Tolerant to Fluctuating Conditions: Able to withstand periods of inundation and drought, and varying pollutant concentrations.
- Effective for Pollutant Uptake/Degradation: Some species are known for their enhanced capacity for nutrient uptake or heavy metal accumulation.
- Deep-rooted: To enhance infiltration, provide bank stabilization, and improve soil structure.
- Resistant to Pests and Diseases: To ensure long-term health and performance.
-
Substrate/Soil Media Design: For systems like constructed wetlands and bioretention cells, the composition of the growing media is vital. It must balance hydraulic conductivity (to allow water flow), water holding capacity (for plant growth), and pollutant adsorption/filtration properties. Engineered soil mixes are often used to optimize these characteristics, incorporating sand, organic matter, and specific amendments (e.g., biochar, iron filings) for enhanced pollutant removal.
-
Connectivity and Integration: NbS should not be viewed in isolation but as integrated components within a broader watershed or urban master plan. They should be strategically connected to existing grey infrastructure (e.g., diverting stormwater from pipes to rain gardens) and to other natural systems to maximize their collective benefits and create resilient networks.
-
Long-Term Maintenance and Monitoring: A comprehensive maintenance plan is essential for sustained functionality. This includes regular vegetation management (weeding, pruning, replanting), sediment removal (especially from forebays), litter collection, and inspection of overflow structures and infiltration surfaces to prevent clogging. Robust monitoring programs are needed to assess performance against design objectives, track pollutant removal efficiencies, observe ecological changes, and inform adaptive management strategies.
-
Stakeholder Engagement and Governance: Successful implementation often relies on strong stakeholder engagement, involving local communities, landowners, municipal departments, and regulatory agencies. Establishing clear governance frameworks and inter-agency collaboration is crucial for overcoming institutional barriers and ensuring long-term stewardship.
By diligently addressing these design and cost considerations, NbS can transition from promising concepts to highly effective, enduring, and economically sound components of integrated water management strategies.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
7. Case Studies of Successful Implementation
Around the globe, numerous successful NbS implementations demonstrate their practical effectiveness and versatility in addressing complex water challenges, while simultaneously yielding a multitude of co-benefits. These case studies provide invaluable lessons and inspiration for broader adoption.
7.1 Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary, USA
The Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary in Arcata, California, is a pioneering and globally renowned example of integrated wastewater treatment using constructed wetlands. Initiated in the 1970s, this innovative system treats the city’s municipal wastewater before discharge into Humboldt Bay, concurrently creating a vibrant wildlife habitat and recreational area (Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary, n.d.).
The system works as follows: primary treated wastewater undergoes secondary treatment in oxidation ponds. The effluent then flows through a series of human-made freshwater and saltwater marshes. In these constructed wetlands, natural processes involving plants (like cattails, bulrushes, and reeds), microorganisms in the water and sediment, and natural filtration mechanisms remove residual pollutants including nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), suspended solids, and pathogens. The treated water is then discharged, meeting stringent water quality standards. Critically, the design seamlessly integrates the treatment wetlands with a 307-acre wildlife sanctuary. This sanctuary provides essential habitat for over 300 species of birds, numerous fish, mammals, and invertebrates, including migratory waterfowl, making it a popular destination for birdwatchers and nature enthusiasts. The project has demonstrated consistent performance in pollutant removal over decades, showcasing the long-term viability of NbS for municipal wastewater treatment. Its success lies not only in its technical efficacy but also in its profound community benefits, including educational opportunities, recreational trails, and enhanced local biodiversity, transforming what would typically be a utilitarian facility into a beloved public amenity and ecological asset.
7.2 Benjakitti Forest Park, Bangkok, Thailand
The Benjakitti Forest Park in the heart of Bangkok, Thailand, is a remarkable urban NbS that showcases how former industrial land can be transformed into a vital green lung and critical flood mitigation infrastructure. Prior to its transformation, the site was occupied by the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly factory. The project involved a comprehensive rehabilitation, creating a sprawling 170-acre green space, with a significant portion dedicated to water management features (Time, 2024).
Opened in stages, the park’s design is a masterclass in urban green infrastructure. It integrates large constructed wetlands, numerous retention ponds, and permeable surfaces strategically placed throughout the park. These features are designed to collectively absorb and manage vast quantities of stormwater runoff during Bangkok’s intense monsoon seasons. The park’s multiple interconnected ponds and wetlands act as massive natural sponges, capable of holding up to 200,000 cubic meters of water. This capacity significantly reduces the burden on the city’s conventional drainage system, which is often overwhelmed, leading to widespread urban flooding. A notable success occurred during a heavy rainfall event in 2022, when the park effectively absorbed deluge, preventing flooding in surrounding residential and commercial areas. Beyond its hydrological function, Benjakitti Forest Park provides extensive recreational opportunities (walking, cycling, rowing), significantly enhances urban biodiversity by supporting various plant and animal species, improves air quality, and mitigates the urban heat island effect, offering a vital cool refuge for city residents. It stands as a powerful example of how large-scale NbS can simultaneously address critical urban challenges, enhance livability, and build climate resilience.
7.3 Sanya Mangrove Park, Hainan Island, China
Sanya City on Hainan Island, China, undertook a significant NbS project to combat the twin challenges of coastal flooding and habitat degradation along the Linchun River. The project focused on the restoration and expansion of the Sanya Mangrove Park, leveraging the ecological functions of mangrove ecosystems for coastal protection and water quality improvement.
Historically, mangrove forests along the Linchun River had been severely degraded due to urbanization, aquaculture, and pollution, leading to increased flood vulnerability and reduced ecological services. The restoration initiative involved:
- Replanting Mangroves: Extensive planting of native mangrove species suitable for the local estuarine conditions. Mangroves have intricate root systems that stabilize sediments, prevent erosion, and create complex habitats.
- Habitat Restoration: Creation of intertidal mudflats and shallow water areas to enhance biodiversity and support a wider range of coastal species, including juvenile fish and crustaceans, which are vital for local fisheries.
- Water Quality Improvements: The dense network of mangrove roots and associated microbial communities effectively filters sediments, nutrients, and other pollutants from riverine runoff before it enters the coastal waters. This significantly improves water clarity and reduces the risk of coastal eutrophication.
The project has successfully mitigated flood risks for nearby communities by absorbing storm surge energy and reducing wave action. The dense mangrove stands act as natural barriers, dissipating destructive wave forces and stabilizing the shoreline. Ecologically, the park has witnessed a remarkable rebound in biodiversity, attracting numerous bird species, marine life, and insects, contributing to a healthier coastal ecosystem. Economically, the restored mangroves support local fisheries and have boosted ecotourism, providing recreational and educational opportunities for residents and visitors. The Sanya Mangrove Park demonstrates the immense value of restoring critical coastal ecosystems as a powerful NbS for integrated water management, coastal resilience, and socio-economic development.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
8. Challenges and Limitations of Nature-Based Solutions
Despite their undeniable benefits, the widespread adoption and successful implementation of NbS are not without challenges and limitations. Addressing these requires proactive planning, innovative approaches, and supportive policy frameworks.
8.1 Space Constraints
One of the most significant challenges, particularly in dense urban environments, is the availability of sufficient land for large-scale NbS implementation. Constructed wetlands, restored floodplains, and extensive urban forests require considerable spatial footprints that may conflict with existing land uses or urban development plans.
- Urban Density: In highly urbanized areas, land is often scarce and expensive, making it difficult to allocate large parcels for green infrastructure. This can limit the scale and type of NbS that can be implemented.
- Competing Land Uses: Green spaces may be perceived as ‘unproductive’ land when compared to commercial, residential, or industrial development, leading to competition for space.
Potential Solutions: Vertical greening (green walls), smaller distributed green infrastructure elements (rain gardens, tree pits), integration of NbS into existing grey infrastructure footprints (e.g., naturalizing stormwater ponds within parks), and multi-functional designs that serve multiple purposes (e.g., flood parks that are also recreational areas) can help mitigate space constraints.
8.2 Maintenance Requirements and Performance Variability
While often touted for lower life-cycle costs, NbS are not ‘set and forget’ solutions. They require ongoing, tailored maintenance, which can sometimes be underestimated or inadequately funded.
- Ongoing Maintenance: Unlike pipes and concrete, living systems require continuous care. This includes vegetation management (pruning, weeding, pest control), sediment removal, litter collection, and inspection of infiltration surfaces to prevent clogging. Neglecting maintenance can lead to reduced performance or even system failure.
- Skilled Labor: Effective maintenance often requires a skilled workforce trained in ecological management, horticulture, and hydrological principles, which may not always be readily available.
- Performance Variability: The effectiveness of NbS can be influenced by environmental factors such as temperature, seasonal variations, rainfall intensity, and antecedent moisture conditions. For instance, nutrient removal in wetlands may decrease during colder months when microbial activity slows down. Heavy sediment loads can clog permeable surfaces or reduce wetland efficiency. This variability requires adaptive management strategies and robust monitoring.
- Long-Term Effectiveness: While many NbS have demonstrated long-term success, consistent data on the very long-term (e.g., 50+ years) performance of all types of NbS, especially under varying climate change scenarios, is still emerging.
8.3 Regulatory and Governance Hurdles
Integrating NbS into existing regulatory frameworks and governance structures can be complex due to entrenched practices and fragmented responsibilities.
- Lack of Clear Policy Frameworks: Many existing regulations are designed around conventional grey infrastructure and may not adequately recognize, permit, or incentivize NbS. There can be a lack of specific guidelines for the design, construction, and monitoring of NbS.
- Fragmented Responsibilities: Water management often falls under multiple agencies (e.g., stormwater, wastewater, land use planning, parks and recreation), each with different mandates, budgets, and expertise. This can hinder integrated planning and implementation of multi-functional NbS.
- Valuation Challenges: The multi-functional benefits of NbS (e.g., flood reduction, biodiversity, air quality, recreation) often accrue to different sectors or budgets, making it difficult to capture their full value in traditional cost-benefit analyses or secure cross-sectoral funding.
- Risk Aversion: Public agencies and decision-makers may be risk-averse to adopting novel approaches, especially if they perceive performance uncertainties or lack familiar regulatory pathways.
8.4 Public Perception and Acceptance
Public perception can be a significant hurdle, especially for urban NbS.
- Aesthetic Concerns: Some green infrastructure elements, particularly during establishment phases, might be perceived as ‘messy’ or unkempt compared to manicured landscapes or conventional hardscapes.
- Misconceptions: Lack of understanding about the functions and benefits of NbS can lead to skepticism or resistance from communities, especially if they are not adequately engaged in the planning process.
- Fear of Pests: Concerns about mosquito breeding in water features or increased wildlife presence can sometimes arise, though proper design and maintenance can mitigate these.
8.5 Knowledge Gaps and Data Limitations
While the science behind NbS is rapidly evolving, there are still areas where more research and long-term data are needed.
- Performance Data: More comprehensive, long-term monitoring data is needed across diverse climatic conditions and pollutant loads to better predict and guarantee the performance of various NbS types.
- Design Optimization: Further research can refine design parameters for specific pollutant removal targets, especially for emerging contaminants.
- Scaling Up: Understanding how individual NbS elements perform when integrated into larger, interconnected networks is crucial for effective regional planning.
Overcoming these challenges requires a concerted effort involving interdisciplinary research, innovative policy development, community engagement, and sustained investment in education and capacity building.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
9. Conclusion and Future Directions
Nature-based solutions unequivocally represent a cornerstone for sustainable water management in the 21st century. Their inherent capacity to leverage natural processes for pollutant removal, hydrological regulation, and flood mitigation, while simultaneously delivering a rich tapestry of co-benefits, positions them as indispensable tools in addressing the complex and interconnected challenges of water scarcity, pollution, and climate change. As this report has detailed, from the intricate bioremediation processes within constructed wetlands to the broad hydrological regulation provided by urban green infrastructure and restored floodplains, NbS offer effective, often more cost-efficient, and inherently more resilient alternatives or complements to traditional grey infrastructure.
Their ability to enhance biodiversity, mitigate and adapt to climate change, improve human health and well-being, and generate economic advantages creates a powerful value proposition that extends far beyond mere water treatment or flood control. Case studies from Arcata, Bangkok, and Sanya exemplify the transformative potential of NbS when thoughtfully designed and implemented, showcasing successful integration of ecological restoration with urban development and community benefits.
However, unlocking the full potential of NbS requires navigating existing challenges related to space constraints, ensuring appropriate long-term maintenance, overcoming regulatory and governance hurdles, and fostering greater public understanding and acceptance. These limitations underscore the need for continued innovation and strategic planning.
Looking ahead, several key directions are crucial for the widespread and effective adoption of NbS:
- Integrated Planning and Hybrid Approaches: Future water management strategies must increasingly integrate NbS with existing grey infrastructure. Hybrid solutions, combining the strengths of both, can offer optimized performance and resilience. This necessitates interdisciplinary planning that breaks down traditional silos between engineering, ecological, and urban planning disciplines.
- Policy and Governance Reform: Governments at all levels need to develop supportive policy frameworks, clear regulatory guidelines, and strong incentives for NbS implementation. This includes mainstreaming NbS into urban master plans, national water policies, and climate adaptation strategies. Financial mechanisms, such as green bonds, payments for ecosystem services, and dedicated funding streams, are essential to unlock investment.
- Robust Monitoring and Research: Continued investment in long-term performance monitoring is critical to build the evidence base for NbS effectiveness across diverse contexts and to refine design parameters. Research should focus on optimizing pollutant removal for emerging contaminants, understanding long-term ecological dynamics, and quantifying socio-economic benefits more precisely.
- Capacity Building and Education: There is a pressing need to build capacity among professionals (engineers, planners, landscape architects, policymakers) in the design, implementation, and maintenance of NbS. Public education and engagement initiatives are equally vital to foster community buy-in and stewardship.
- Scaling Up and Replicability: Moving beyond individual projects to integrated, landscape-scale NbS networks (e.g., ‘sponge cities’ at a regional level) will amplify their benefits. Identifying best practices and developing adaptable models for replicability across different socio-ecological contexts is key.
In conclusion, NbS are not merely an option but a strategic imperative for forging a sustainable, resilient, and biodiverse future. By embracing and investing in these natural assets, societies can secure vital water resources, protect communities from environmental hazards, and foster healthier, more livable environments for generations to come. Their multi-faceted benefits solidify their position as the intelligent choice for sustainable water management on a global scale.
Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.
References
- Arcata Wastewater Treatment Plant and Wildlife Sanctuary. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcata_Wastewater_Treatment_Plant_and_Wildlife_Sanctuary
- City of Portland, Bureau of Environmental Services. (2017). Green Infrastructure: An Integrated Approach to Stormwater Management. Retrieved from https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/article/62909
- Garcia-Herrero, L., Lavrnic, S., Guerrieri, V., Toscano, A., Milani, M., Cirelli, G. L., & Vittuari, M. (2023). Cost-benefit of green infrastructures for water management: A sustainability assessment of full-scale constructed wetlands in Northern and Southern Italy. arXiv preprint. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06284
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (n.d.). Nature-based Solutions. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/our-work/nature-based-solutions
- Kadlec, R. H., & Wallace, S. D. (2009). Treatment Wetlands (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
- Sponge City. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponge_city
- Temmerman, S., Meire, P., Bouma, T. J., Herman, P. M. J., Ysebaert, T., & De Vriend, D. E. (2013). Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature, 504(7478), 79-83.
- Time. (2024). How Cities Are Using Nature-Based Solutions to Tackle Floods. Retrieved from https://time.com/7202917/cities-nature-based-solutions-floods/
- Vymazal, J. (2011). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Five years of experience. Environmental Engineering Science, 28(1), 1-13.
Be the first to comment