A Comprehensive Analysis of Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM) Calculations: Methodologies, Applications, and Future Outlook for Non-Domestic Buildings

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

The imperative to mitigate climate change and enhance energy security has significantly elevated the importance of building energy performance assessment. In the United Kingdom, the Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM) stands as a foundational analytical tool for evaluating the energy efficiency of non-domestic buildings, ensuring compliance with Part L of the Building Regulations, and facilitating the issuance of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs). This report provides an in-depth exploration of SBEM calculations, transcending its role as a mere compliance mechanism to elucidate its technical underpinnings, essential data inputs, and the nuanced interpretation of its outputs. It examines the software ecosystems supporting SBEM, identifies common challenges encountered in its application, and proposes advanced strategies for its integration into early design stages to foster genuine performance optimization rather than solely regulatory adherence. While acknowledging SBEM’s inherent simplifications as a steady-state model, this research argues for its continued relevance when applied judiciously and advocates for a proactive, integrated approach to building design that leverages SBEM’s capabilities to drive sustainable construction practices and a pathway towards net-zero built environments.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The global commitment to decarbonization places the built environment at the forefront of energy efficiency efforts. Buildings are significant consumers of energy, contributing substantially to overall carbon emissions. Consequently, regulatory frameworks worldwide have been established to mandate and encourage improvements in building energy performance. In the United Kingdom, Part L of the Building Regulations, focused on the ‘Conservation of Fuel and Power’, serves as the primary legislative driver for energy efficiency in both domestic and non-domestic structures. Central to the assessment of non-domestic building energy performance and compliance with these regulations is the Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM). [2, 4, 19]

Introduced as part of the National Calculation Methodology (NCM) in 2006, SBEM was developed by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) to provide a consistent and reliable method for evaluating the annual energy use and associated carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of non-domestic buildings under standardised operating conditions. [2, 4, 7, 12] It functions as a ‘health check’, predicting the efficiency of a building’s heating, cooling, lighting, and ventilation systems. [4] Beyond its foundational role in demonstrating compliance for new builds, extensions, and changes of use, leading to the generation of a Building Regulations UK Part L (BRUKL) report and an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC), SBEM offers a powerful analytical lens through which design decisions can be scrutinised. [4, 5, 11, 13]

This research report aims to provide an exhaustive overview of SBEM calculations, tailored for an expert audience. It moves beyond a rudimentary description to unpack the technical methodology that underpins SBEM, detailing the specific data inputs essential for accurate modelling. Crucially, it explores the informed interpretation of SBEM outputs, differentiating between regulatory compliance metrics and broader performance indicators. The report further investigates the landscape of software tools utilised for SBEM assessments, highlights prevalent pitfalls and challenges faced by practitioners, and, perhaps most critically, articulates advanced strategies for leveraging SBEM not merely as a compliance hurdle but as a dynamic tool for optimising building performance from the earliest stages of design. By critically examining SBEM’s capabilities and limitations, this report seeks to foster a deeper understanding of its strategic application in the pursuit of sustainable and energy-efficient non-domestic buildings.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Technical Methodology of SBEM

SBEM operates within the broader framework of the National Calculation Methodology (NCM), which defines the procedures for assessing the energy performance of buildings for Building Regulations compliance and Energy Performance Certification. [2, 3, 7] The NCM distinguishes between two classes of software tools: Dynamic Simulation Models (DSMs) and the Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM). [3] While DSMs conduct detailed hourly or sub-hourly simulations using real site weather data and often leverage 3D geometric models, SBEM employs a ‘simplified’ approach, primarily based on a monthly average calculation of energy use and carbon emissions. [3, 7, 18, 43]

At its core, SBEM is a quasi-steady-state model. [24, 43] Unlike dynamic simulation, which models the transient thermal behaviour of a building over time, SBEM estimates energy consumption based on average monthly conditions. [18] This simplification, while making calculations less computationally intensive and more accessible, inherently involves certain assumptions and standardisation. The calculation engine within SBEM performs heat loss and heat gain calculations for various building zones, determining energy consumption for specific end uses: heating, cooling, hot water, lighting, and ventilation. [2, 4, 29]

Key to SBEM’s methodology is the concept of ‘zones’. A building is typically divided into zones, each assigned a specific ‘activity’ or use (e.g., office, retail, toilet, storage). [4, 6] These activity areas come with predefined, standardised data for occupancy levels, lighting power densities, equipment loads, and operating hours, which are drawn from common databases associated with the NCM. [2, 4, 6, 22] While these standard profiles facilitate consistency across assessments, they can sometimes deviate significantly from actual building operation, potentially leading to a ‘performance gap’ between predicted and actual energy use. [20]

Thermal mass, U-values (thermal transmittance of building elements like walls, roofs, and floors), and g-values (solar heat gain coefficient for glazing) are critical fabric properties that directly influence the building’s energy balance. [5, 6, 14] SBEM incorporates these values to quantify heat transfer through the building envelope. Air permeability, a measure of airtightness, also plays a significant role in determining infiltration losses, although for smaller buildings (under 500m²) a default value may be assumed if no air pressure testing is conducted. [5, 37]

Furthermore, SBEM considers the efficiencies of building services equipment, including HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) plant, control strategies, fan power, and pump power. [6, 14] Renewable energy systems, such as solar photovoltaics (PV) and solar thermal, can also be integrated into the model to offset conventional energy demands and reduce carbon emissions. [6, 14, 28] The model then calculates the CO2 emissions based on standardized fuel emission factors for grid electricity, natural gas, LPG, oil, and other energy sources. [22, 39]

The ultimate purpose of these calculations is to compare the energy performance of the ‘actual’ proposed building (Building Emission Rate – BER) against a ‘notional’ building. [2, 3, 7] The notional building is a hypothetical structure of the same size, shape, zoning, and orientation as the actual building, but designed to meet the minimum energy efficiency standards stipulated in the Building Regulations Part L. [7, 22, 37] This comparison yields the Target Emission Rate (TER), which the BER of the actual building must be less than or equal to for compliance. [5, 7, 10, 11]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Essential Data Inputs for SBEM Calculations

The accuracy and reliability of an SBEM assessment are directly proportional to the quality and completeness of the input data. [13] A meticulous approach to data collection is paramount, as even minor inaccuracies can significantly skew the final results, potentially leading to non-compliance or a sub-optimal energy performance certificate. The required data inputs can be broadly categorised as follows:

3.1. Building Geometry

Fundamental to any energy model is a precise representation of the building’s physical form. This includes:
* Dimensions: Overall length, width, and height of the building. [13]
* Floor Areas and Volumes: Detailed floor plans are essential for calculating the conditioned floor area and overall building volume, which directly impact heating and cooling loads. [4, 13]
* Orientation: The cardinal orientation of each façade (north, south, east, west) is critical for assessing solar gains and losses. [5, 29]
* Zoning: The building must be divided into specific ‘zones’ based on their activity type (e.g., office, corridor, toilet, storage, kitchen). Each zone will have distinct operational assumptions (occupancy, lighting, heating/cooling schedules) applied. [4, 6, 22]

3.2. Building Fabric Properties

The thermal performance of the building envelope is a primary determinant of energy consumption. Key fabric inputs include:
* U-values: Thermal transmittance values for all external elements (walls, roofs, floors, windows, doors, skylights). These quantify how well a building element resists heat transfer. Specific minimum U-values are typically mandated by Building Regulations Part L. [5, 6, 14, 38]
* g-values (Solar Transmittance): For glazing, this value represents the fraction of solar radiation that passes through the window, influencing cooling loads. [6]
* Thermal Bridges: Linear thermal transmittance values (psi-values) at junctions between building elements (e.g., wall-floor junctions) account for localised heat losses. [6]
* Air Permeability: This indicates the airtightness of the building envelope, usually expressed in m³/h.m² at 50 Pa. A lower value signifies better airtightness, reducing infiltration and associated energy losses. For new builds, an air pressure test is often required at the ‘as-built’ stage, and its results are incorporated into the final SBEM calculation. [5, 17]

3.3. Building Services Data

Detailed specifications of the mechanical and electrical systems are crucial for an accurate assessment of operational energy use:
* HVAC Systems: This encompasses heating systems (e.g., boilers, heat pumps, district heating), cooling systems (e.g., chillers, VRF systems), and ventilation systems. Inputs include plant efficiencies, seasonal performance factors (e.g., SCOP, SEER), control strategies (e.g., zoning, time controls), and fan/pump power. [6, 14, 28]
* Domestic Hot Water (DHW): Information on the hot water generation system, its efficiency, and distribution losses. [6, 21]
* Lighting: Details on the luminaires (e.g., LED efficacy in lumens per circuit watt), lighting power densities (W/m²), and control mechanisms (e.g., daylight sensors, occupancy sensors, automatic time switching). High-efficiency LED fittings and intelligent controls are critical for optimising lighting energy use. [5, 6, 10, 14, 28]
* Renewable Energy Technologies: Any on-site renewable energy generation systems, such as solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, solar thermal collectors, or wind turbines, must be detailed, including their capacity and expected energy yield. [6, 14, 30]

3.4. Occupancy and Operational Data

While SBEM uses standardised activity profiles, some customisation or verification may be possible:
* Building Type and Use Classes: Categorising the building and its zones according to the Town and Country Planning Order 1987 is essential, as this dictates the default occupancy and operational profiles applied. [22]
* Operating Hours: Standard operating hours are assumed based on activity type, but actual project-specific variations should be considered where permissible and justifiable. [4]

3.5. Fuel Types and Weather Data

• Fuel Types: The primary fuel sources for heating, cooling, and hot water (e.g., grid electricity, natural gas, LPG, oil, biomass, district heating) directly influence the CO2 emission factors applied in the calculation. [22, 39]
• Weather Data: SBEM utilises standardised weather data for the building’s geographic location. [6]

The process of collecting and inputting this data typically involves reviewing architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations, sections, site plans), building services specifications, and engaging in close communication with the design team. [5, 13] Early engagement of a qualified Non-Domestic Energy Assessor (NDEA) is crucial to ensure all necessary information is gathered accurately and efficiently, mitigating potential delays and costly redesigns later in the project lifecycle. [5, 17, 22]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Interpretation and Application of SBEM Results

SBEM calculations culminate in several key output metrics that serve both regulatory compliance and performance evaluation purposes. Understanding these outputs is critical for architects, developers, and building owners to assess a building’s energy efficiency and make informed decisions.

4.1. Output Metrics

The primary outputs of an SBEM assessment are encapsulated in the Building Regulations UK Part L (BRUKL) Report and the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC). [4, 13, 35, 42] Key metrics include:

• Building Emission Rate (BER): This represents the calculated CO2 emission rate for the proposed or actual building, expressed in kgCO2/m²/annum. It quantifies the operational carbon footprint. [5, 7, 35]
• Target Emission Rate (TER): The TER is the benchmark CO2 emission rate for the ‘notional building,’ which is a hypothetical equivalent of the actual building designed to meet minimum Part L standards. [7, 22, 37] For compliance, the BER must be less than or equal to the TER. [5, 7, 10]
• Building Primary Energy Rate (BPER) and Target Primary Energy Rate (TPER): In addition to CO2 emissions, Part L (particularly newer versions) also considers primary energy consumption. The BPER (actual building) must be less than the TPER (notional building) to demonstrate compliance with primary energy targets. [38]
• Predicted Energy Consumption: SBEM provides a breakdown of predicted annual energy consumption (in kWh/m²/year) for various end uses, including heating, cooling, lighting, and ventilation. [2, 6] This granular data is invaluable for identifying the most energy-intensive aspects of a building’s design. [4, 14]
• Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) Asset Rating: The EPC assigns a numerical rating (typically on a scale from A to G, where A is most efficient) based on the building’s predicted energy performance, derived from comparing the actual building’s CO2 emissions to a ‘reference building’ (distinct from the notional building for Part L compliance). [6, 22, 35] The EPC is a legal requirement for new non-domestic buildings upon completion and for existing buildings at the point of sale or rent. [4, 6, 13, 37]
• Recommendations Report: Alongside the EPC, a recommendations report outlines potential energy efficiency improvements for the building, though these are often generic rather than project-specific. [6]

4.2. Compliance Assessment

For new commercial and non-domestic buildings, or significant refurbishments/extensions over 50m², SBEM calculations are mandatory for demonstrating compliance with Part L Volume 2 of the Building Regulations. [5, 11] The primary compliance hurdle is Criterion 1, which dictates that the calculated BER must not exceed the TER. [22, 38] Additionally, compliance checks are performed against minimum standards for building fabric (e.g., U-values) and fixed building services, and to ensure solar gains are limited to prevent overheating. [5, 36]

Assessments are conducted at two crucial stages: the ‘As Design’ stage (pre-construction for planning approval) and the ‘As Built’ stage (post-construction for final building control sign-off and EPC issuance). [4, 5, 10] Any discrepancies between the design and as-built performance, such as changes in specified materials or equipment, must be captured in the final assessment. [5]

4.3. Beyond Compliance: Strategic Applications

While SBEM is primarily a compliance tool, its outputs offer significant opportunities for value-added analysis and strategic decision-making:

• Identifying Areas for Improvement: The detailed breakdown of energy consumption by end-use allows designers and assessors to pinpoint specific areas of inefficiency. For instance, if lighting energy is disproportionately high, it signals a need to investigate more efficient luminaires or better daylighting strategies. [4, 5, 28]
• Benchmarking: The EPC rating provides a clear benchmark of a building’s energy performance relative to others. A strong EPC can enhance marketability and asset value, particularly in the context of Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) legislation. [31, 34]
• Cost-Benefit Analysis: By understanding the predicted energy savings from various design interventions (e.g., improved insulation, more efficient HVAC), designers can conduct cost-benefit analyses to justify investments in higher-performing specifications. [16]
• Design Iteration and Optimization: Although SBEM is a simplified model, it can be used iteratively during the design process to test different scenarios and refine specifications to achieve a better BER. [30] This transforms SBEM from a mere checklist into a tool for proactive design optimization.

4.4. Limitations in Interpretation

It is crucial to acknowledge the inherent limitations in interpreting SBEM results. As a quasi-steady-state model based on standardised operating conditions and occupancy profiles, SBEM’s predictions may not perfectly align with a building’s actual ‘in-use’ performance. [20, 34, 43] Factors such as occupant behaviour, actual weather conditions, and precise system commissioning can introduce a ‘performance gap’. [20] Therefore, while SBEM is an excellent indicator for compliance and comparative analysis, it should be viewed as a predictive model under defined conditions, rather than a precise meter of future energy bills. For more complex analyses or a closer prediction of operational energy, Dynamic Simulation Models (DSMs) are generally more appropriate. [3, 20, 43]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Software Tools and Their Implementation

The National Calculation Methodology (NCM) mandates the use of approved software tools for conducting SBEM calculations. [3] While the core SBEM calculation engine itself was developed by BRE, various commercial software packages provide user interfaces and additional functionalities that streamline the assessment process. [2, 3, 4] These tools are critical for translating complex building data into the structured inputs required by the SBEM methodology and for generating the necessary compliance reports and EPCs. [13]

5.1. Common Commercial SBEM Software Packages

Several prominent software solutions are widely used by Non-Domestic Energy Assessors (NDEAs) in the UK:

• iSBEM: This is the direct user interface developed by BRE for the SBEM calculation engine. [2, 3] It is often considered the baseline tool, providing direct access to the underlying methodology without extensive graphical modelling capabilities. It is freely available from the NCM website. [7]
• DesignBuilder: While DesignBuilder is a powerful dynamic simulation modelling (DSM) tool, it also incorporates an NCM-approved SBEM interface. [4] This allows users to leverage its comprehensive 3D modelling capabilities to generate building geometry and then apply the SBEM calculation method. This integration can be highly beneficial for design teams already using 3D modelling. [4]
• IES (Virtual Environment): Similar to DesignBuilder, IES is a sophisticated suite of building performance analysis tools that includes an NCM-approved SBEM module (e.g., ApacheSim for dynamic simulation and an SBEM interface for compliance). [4, 43] Its strength lies in its ability to handle complex geometries and services, and to perform both simplified and highly detailed dynamic simulations from the same model. [4, 25]
• TAS (Thermal Analysis Software): Developed by EDSL, TAS is another robust DSM tool that provides an SBEM interface. [4] It is known for its detailed thermal modelling capabilities and is often used for more complex or high-performance building designs where a simplified approach might not suffice for design optimisation, though it still produces SBEM-compliant outputs. [4]

5.2. Features and User Experience

While all approved software tools adhere to the same underlying SBEM methodology, they differ in their user interfaces, workflow efficiencies, and additional features:

• 3D Modelling vs. Direct Input: Some tools, like DesignBuilder and IES , allow for graphical 3D modelling of the building, which can simplify the input of geometric data and visual verification. [4, 28] Others, like iSBEM, primarily rely on tabular data entry. [22]
• Integration Capabilities: More advanced tools can integrate with Building Information Modelling (BIM) platforms, allowing for better data exchange and reducing manual input errors. This integration is a growing trend in the industry, enhancing workflow efficiency. [9]
• Reporting: All tools generate the mandatory BRUKL reports and EPCs. [6, 13] However, the level of detail and customisation in additional analytical reports can vary, with DSM-enabled software often providing more in-depth performance breakdowns.
• Ease of Use vs. Flexibility: iSBEM is often perceived as simpler for straightforward compliance cases, while tools like DesignBuilder and IES offer greater flexibility for complex building types or for performing comparative analyses beyond basic compliance. [3, 4]

5.3. Importance of NCM Approval

It is imperative that any software tool used for SBEM assessments is formally approved under the National Calculation Methodology. [3] This approval ensures that the software correctly implements the NCM algorithms and databases, guaranteeing consistency and validity of the compliance outputs. Regular updates to the NCM and associated software versions are released to reflect changes in Building Regulations (e.g., Part L 2021) and to incorporate new technologies or improved calculation procedures. Assessors must ensure they are using the correct and most up-to-date version of the approved software for their projects. [3]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Common Pitfalls and Challenges in SBEM Assessments

Despite SBEM’s foundational role in UK building regulations, its application is not without challenges. Practitioners frequently encounter issues that can compromise the accuracy of results, delay projects, or lead to sub-optimal building performance outcomes. Understanding these common pitfalls is crucial for mitigating risks and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of SBEM assessments.

6.1. Data Accuracy and Completeness

One of the most pervasive challenges is the reliance on accurate and complete input data. [13]

• Missing or Incorrect Inputs: Assessors often receive incomplete architectural drawings or vague specifications for building services. Assumptions must then be made, which can lead to a divergence between the modelled and actual building performance. For instance, generic U-values might be used if precise construction details are unavailable, potentially underestimating heat losses. [34]
• Late Specification Changes: Design iterations throughout a project lifecycle can introduce changes to the building fabric, HVAC systems, or lighting. If these changes are not communicated promptly to the SBEM assessor and updated in the model, the ‘As-Built’ assessment may fail to comply, requiring costly last-minute rectifications. [5, 17]

6.2. Misinterpretation of Regulations and NCM Guidance

The Building Regulations, particularly Part L, are complex and subject to periodic updates.

• Nuances of Part L: Specific requirements, such as the interplay between carbon emissions (BER/TER), primary energy (BPER/TPER), and fabric U-value targets, can be misunderstood. [5, 38] Incorrect application of these criteria can lead to compliance failures.
• Notional vs. Reference Building: Confusion between the ‘notional building’ (used for Part L compliance) and the ‘reference building’ (used for EPC asset rating) can lead to misinterpretations of the compliance targets and the final energy rating. [22]

6.3. Oversimplification vs. Reality

SBEM, by design, is a simplified model. This simplification, while aiding accessibility, introduces inherent limitations:

• Standardised Profiles: The use of default occupancy patterns, operating hours, and equipment loads based on ‘activity areas’ might not reflect the actual, often dynamic, usage patterns of a specific building. [4, 20] This can contribute to the ‘performance gap’ between predicted and actual energy consumption. [20, 34]
• Steady-State Limitations: As a quasi-steady-state model, SBEM struggles to accurately capture complex transient thermal phenomena, such as intermittent heating/cooling, dynamic solar shading, or the precise interaction of thermal mass with varying internal and external conditions. [18, 20, 24, 43] This can be particularly problematic for buildings with unique operational profiles or advanced passive design strategies. For these scenarios, Dynamic Simulation Models (DSMs) are more appropriate. [3, 20, 43]

6.4. Lack of Early Engagement and Collaboration

A critical and frequently cited pitfall is the late involvement of the SBEM assessor in the design process. [5, 17]

• Retrofitting Compliance: If SBEM assessments are only conducted at the tail end of design, or worse, after construction has commenced, identifying compliance issues can necessitate expensive redesigns or remedial work. [5, 10, 38] Energy efficiency measures become ‘backward engineered’ to meet a grade boundary rather than genuinely optimising performance. [34]
• Siloed Design Process: A lack of integrated working between architects, M&E (mechanical & electrical) engineers, and energy assessors can lead to missed opportunities for synergistic design solutions that enhance energy performance. [36]

6.5. Assessor Competency and Interpretation

The quality of an SBEM assessment is heavily dependent on the assessor’s expertise.

• Qualified Professionals: While SBEM software is widely available, competent and accredited Non-Domestic Energy Assessors (NDEAs) are crucial for accurate data input, correct interpretation of the regulations, and providing meaningful advice. [6, 13, 22]
• Over-reliance on Defaults: Inexperienced assessors might over-rely on default values in the software when detailed information is missing, which can lead to less accurate or sub-optimal results. [34]

Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, emphasizing early engagement, thorough data provision, continuous professional development, and a holistic approach to building design that views energy assessment as an integral part of performance optimisation rather than a mere regulatory hurdle. [5, 17, 30]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Advanced Strategies: Leveraging SBEM for Design Optimization

Moving beyond its regulatory mandate, SBEM can be transformed into a potent tool for design optimization when integrated strategically and proactively into the building design process. This paradigm shift from compliance-only thinking to performance-driven design unlocks significant opportunities for enhancing energy efficiency and achieving higher sustainability aspirations.

7.1. Early Design Stage Integration

The most impactful strategy is to engage the SBEM assessor as early as RIBA Stage 2 or 3, well before detailed design is finalised. [5, 17, 36]

• Iterative Design Cycles: Instead of a single ‘pass/fail’ assessment at the end, early engagement allows for iterative modelling. Initial SBEM runs can identify high-level energy performance indicators, guiding fundamental design decisions such as building orientation, massing, and glazing ratios. Subsequent iterations can then refine these choices with more detailed fabric and systems data. [30]
• Parametric Studies: While full parametric optimisation is more common with DSMs, SBEM can still be used to run ‘what-if’ scenarios. For instance, quickly assessing the impact of varying insulation thicknesses, window specifications, or HVAC system efficiencies on the BER. This allows designers to understand the sensitivity of the building’s energy performance to different design parameters. [16, 30]

7.2. Holistic Design Approach

Effective leveraging of SBEM involves considering energy performance as part of a broader, holistic design strategy:

• Passive Design Integration: SBEM can help quantify the benefits of passive design strategies. Optimising building orientation to maximise daylighting and minimise solar gain, incorporating appropriate shading devices, and exploring natural ventilation strategies can significantly reduce reliance on active systems. While SBEM has limitations in dynamically modelling natural ventilation, it can still factor in design elements that contribute to it, and its outputs can highlight where passive strategies reduce heating/cooling loads. [5, 14, 36]
• Fabric First Philosophy: Prioritising a high-performance building envelope with excellent insulation and airtightness often yields the most robust and long-lasting energy savings. SBEM helps validate these ‘fabric first’ approaches by showing their direct impact on the BER and the overall energy demand. [5, 10, 28]

7.3. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Value Engineering

SBEM outputs can be invaluable for making financially sound decisions about energy-efficient investments.

• Quantifying Returns: By associating different design options with their predicted energy consumption, assessors can help quantify potential operational cost savings over the building’s lifecycle. This allows for a more informed cost-benefit analysis, demonstrating the long-term value of investing in higher specification materials or more efficient systems, even if upfront costs are higher. [16]
• Justifying Enhanced Specifications: When a design initially struggles to meet the TER, SBEM can be used to model various remedial measures. This enables designers to select the most cost-effective solutions for achieving compliance, rather than simply opting for the cheapest, least effective fix. [10]

7.4. Beyond Compliance: Striving for Net Zero and Advanced Targets

While SBEM’s primary role is regulatory compliance, it can serve as a baseline for achieving more ambitious sustainability targets:

• Setting Higher Benchmarks: Clients increasingly aim for targets beyond basic Part L compliance, such as BREEAM ‘Excellent’ or even net-zero carbon operation. SBEM can be used to assess the gap between compliance and these higher aspirations, informing the additional measures required (e.g., increased renewable energy generation, enhanced fabric performance). [5, 36]
• Informing Renewable Energy Strategies: SBEM’s ability to model the contribution of renewable technologies allows for the assessment of different sizes and types of systems (e.g., PV arrays, heat pumps) to determine the most effective way to offset carbon emissions and potentially reach net-zero operational carbon. [14, 28]

7.5. Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) and Model Refinement

Although SBEM is a design-stage tool, its predictive outputs can be compared with actual ‘in-use’ energy consumption data through Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE). While SBEM’s standardised nature means a direct match is unlikely, significant discrepancies can inform future design practices and highlight areas where assumptions in the model (e.g., operating hours, occupant behaviour) need refinement. This feedback loop is crucial for bridging the ‘performance gap’ and continuously improving the accuracy of future energy predictions. [20]

By adopting these advanced strategies, SBEM transitions from a static regulatory requirement to a dynamic design enabler, allowing stakeholders to proactively shape buildings that are not only compliant but also genuinely energy-efficient, cost-effective, and aligned with broader sustainability objectives. [30, 33]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Future Directions and Evolution of Building Energy Models

The landscape of building energy modelling is continuously evolving, driven by an accelerating need for deeper insights into energy performance, the imperative for decarbonisation, and advancements in computational capabilities. While SBEM remains a key compliance tool in the UK, the trajectory of building energy modelling points towards more sophisticated, integrated, and data-rich approaches.

8.1. Shift Towards Dynamic Simulation

There is a growing recognition of the limitations of steady-state models, such as SBEM, particularly for complex buildings, transient conditions, and detailed design optimisation. [20, 24, 43] Dynamic Simulation Models (DSMs) offer higher temporal resolution (hourly or sub-hourly), account for real site weather data, and can model the complex interactions between building fabric, HVAC systems, and internal loads more accurately. [3, 20, 25, 43] This allows for better prediction of peak loads, overheating risks, and the effectiveness of advanced control strategies. [20, 25] The ‘performance gap’ often observed between predicted and actual energy use is partly attributed to the simplifications inherent in steady-state approaches. [20, 24] Future regulatory frameworks may increasingly mandate or incentivise the use of DSMs for specific building types or performance targets, particularly as the industry moves towards more stringent net-zero carbon goals. [20]

8.2. Integration with Smart Building Technologies and Real-Time Data

The proliferation of smart building technologies, IoT sensors, and advanced Building Management Systems (BMS) presents an unprecedented opportunity for energy modelling. [9, 16]

• Real-time Performance Monitoring: Future models are likely to integrate more seamlessly with operational data from buildings, moving beyond static ‘as-built’ assessments to continuous performance monitoring and optimisation. This allows for real-time adjustments to building systems based on actual occupancy and environmental conditions. [8]
• Model Calibration and Predictive Control: Machine learning and AI algorithms can be employed to calibrate energy models against actual energy consumption data, improving their predictive accuracy. [9, 16, 24] This calibrated model can then be used for predictive control, where the building’s systems are optimised based on anticipated future loads and weather conditions, further reducing energy waste. [8]

8.3. Embodied Carbon and Whole Life Carbon Assessment

Current energy models primarily focus on operational carbon emissions (energy consumed during a building’s use). However, there is a growing emphasis on accounting for ’embodied carbon’ – the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal of building materials. Future building energy assessments will increasingly integrate whole-life carbon assessment methodologies, moving beyond operational energy to provide a more comprehensive environmental footprint of a building. This will influence material selection and construction practices, necessitating a broader scope for modelling tools.

8.4. Consideration of Future Climate Data

Traditional energy modelling relies on historical Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) weather data. [26] However, with climate change, past weather patterns are no longer reliable indicators of future conditions. Initiatives are underway to develop ‘future weather files’ that incorporate climate projections, allowing building designs to be tested against anticipated hotter summers or more extreme weather events over their expected 50-year lifespan. [26] Integrating these future climate scenarios into energy models will be crucial for designing resilient and adaptable buildings.

8.5. Adaptive Comfort Models and Occupant Behaviour

Recognising that occupant behaviour significantly influences actual energy consumption, future models will likely incorporate more sophisticated adaptive comfort models and behavioural patterns. This moves beyond static assumptions of setpoint temperatures and occupancy schedules to dynamically account for how occupants interact with their environment and building systems, leading to more realistic energy predictions and better design for human comfort. [23]

In conclusion, while SBEM serves a vital compliance function, the future of building energy modelling is heading towards greater sophistication, integration, and predictive power. This evolution will be instrumental in achieving ambitious decarbonisation targets and creating truly sustainable and resilient built environments. [9, 16]

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

9. Conclusion

The Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM) remains an indispensable tool within the UK’s regulatory landscape for assessing the energy performance of non-domestic buildings. As demonstrated in this report, its role extends beyond mere compliance with Part L of the Building Regulations and the generation of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs); it functions as a crucial ‘health check’ of a building’s projected energy efficiency for heating, cooling, lighting, and ventilation. [4, 5, 12]

This research has delved into the technical methodology of SBEM, highlighting its quasi-steady-state approach and its reliance on the National Calculation Methodology (NCM) to compare a proposed building’s performance (Building Emission Rate, BER) against a ‘notional building’ benchmark (Target Emission Rate, TER). [3, 7] The critical importance of accurate and comprehensive data inputs – spanning building geometry, fabric properties, detailed HVAC and lighting specifications, and renewable energy integrations – cannot be overstated, as these directly determine the reliability of the assessment outputs. [5, 13] The interpretation of these results, particularly the nuanced distinction between compliance metrics and broader performance indicators, is vital for stakeholders to make informed decisions and identify areas for energy optimisation. [22]

While approved software tools like iSBEM, DesignBuilder, IES , and TAS provide the necessary platforms for conducting these calculations, the common pitfalls, such as late engagement of assessors, incomplete data, and the inherent simplifications of a steady-state model, underscore the need for a more integrated and proactive approach. [4, 5, 17, 34] Indeed, the most effective strategy for leveraging SBEM is to integrate it early in the design process, utilising it for iterative ‘what-if’ scenario testing, comprehensive cost-benefit analyses, and to champion a ‘fabric first’ philosophy. [5, 30, 36] This allows for the optimisation of building performance beyond minimum compliance, paving the way for higher sustainability aspirations, including net-zero ambitions. [33]

Looking ahead, the trajectory of building energy modelling points towards an increasing reliance on dynamic simulation, deeper integration with smart building technologies and real-time operational data, and a broader scope that encompasses embodied carbon and future climate change scenarios. [9, 16, 26] While these advancements will inevitably push the boundaries of energy assessment, SBEM’s foundational principles and its role as a compliance gatekeeper are likely to endure. However, its true value will be realised not merely by fulfilling a regulatory requirement, but by serving as an intelligent analytical instrument, guided by skilled Non-Domestic Energy Assessors, to drive the creation of truly energy-efficient, sustainable, and future-proof non-domestic buildings.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] Current time information in Dumfries and Galloway, GB. https://www.google.com/search?q=time+in+Dumfries+and+Galloway,+GB (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[2] NCM. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG1Q5qfNDHECLzVN8g77kMJxci71rW1bHIYFzSlpDYvE0D4KyYR65mI7q1w6evLVWyBQVgMXOhvw9Vm4AU9-Gl9RN8o-UmFodg-s4liHEgeeeAoma8= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[3] Confused by the National Calculation Methodology? | LABC. (2024, January 4). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEeNFduicCxIv3QdLxZfdr0WabKPQF69LEySE53ycz7yAhRmix69XOyarSwK12zNW2dHotQCtLqMJqjYRMW-Udu9XC9iE6YQ9pqDVSaHDFE-LVJtR-f4Zucg8oeKMZEzvNQzi4KlD8k6QvEIY2e82DvW4-t2mHNTf13tPjgrkjG (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[4] What is SBEM? – Build Energy. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHhfFHfsyxClC_GUiPt0BWurReFQrY39yfgBhRhVv-vbcCLQ-bcWsZw8VviPT822pdAJzmi0wwEmX3SDdTIntMvTR5cyQvFUVDHYjxJehquBX_Gi8gglal5llCvwUXaZN95Fmqo3u1hfCxROjuB3ThiQXnj1jxtVvGdYoOFKMd_0JDSkzapP3Y= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[5] The Importance of SBEM in Non-Domestic Building Compliance – EPCHome. (2024, January 21). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE8CjtBE9xPwXIFusrZC42lxdeV667bowua2Qz-LyKfBbiM1NhSs-YnbQrdJot4WufgNuXVIgxmIAUyQG413J-Ngnet62Mt8391tiGe2R4_UE6vL89j-OHCTzSDvdiDD-G2Vb-Lnvck6MhgnVR0bZTl2hSmrA== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[6] National Calculation Methodology: Simplified Building Energy Model – FIDIC. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQETkoXbhohLW1hDpoTru9KJC-yLrDKZfV8DmZ_-GmbkB-U5EOFO9G3LOc5IZQDnZVShF5XPwHfjZ8QJvWTYEeWBT2-nu1cBO8bqhcUy66HECCjV981DiihgOBmnFNGgD4hrvgHU_LOQ3BzWR6x0ojXrgaAad7oGvaRifaHhY6os5qlRxrwMUSZe5uI= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[7] Simplified Building Energy Model SBEM – Designing Buildings Wiki. (2022, March 14). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGXsvt9VEasI6BnaV0_BoHeheqNx5xaP7ootawP4_raF6X3QOXymNwZbmy6a-YXVt0ab7of7zufFXs1IDmMtBK88K_cpjKPH0u0gQGywKN4FYLMFz0M7i9l2zG1PvETXtLS2ezXbYpTEyB3DlaXsK-lGIY-6RPZCjXzdG35z9EDoZY10lg= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[8] Ask a Modeler: What is the Future of Energy Modeling Going to Look Like for the Industry?. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF6OZ9DYc7nWaqsRt6i1jxkXBPJ3imgWswUXgwqVcEecjmw9ESmzhYYs4F6i3L-D2ZVmvyVGqP1mZBQy6g2qTkjFecPet2UQ2-iUmonWUw4pMEEQdMlUM5q32bJlDI4PEeJR_iizgtTfzZwASUp8bM4mq2xt9p4YYKeiBetuQGQqcSu0tHbnhU5UkhnK4oC4dsK7t7_5CMPk_PCMm0VRoYWfEqbY-ej8Bma9-nJr6R0yowBON5l (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[9] Building Energy Simulations and the Future of Sustainable Architecture – Buildings. (2024, October 21). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE8w7KbeVlsGyopCcjo4djW6FYRh7psGlkH-YKAfoOoU5cB0UVRTWdJedZp2voyYurgDs5LZ1y1C5HEsmXlfk0Z4BVC97hPLNmV4dSOUbcwUd6fiHFP6Zapp0rZRhRBOByv-c83tUo6HZQG-nrXreu2vjHuAMHmQGJPhFd_4yYmvi3iEj-MYAXtE5-1C3xvlVK86jSVdi07Iw9QJz_rhTjR1v75czvD9RSbQGwF6xV_wqN6q-Mc_gSJaNDFgQ== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[10] Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM ) – Leicestershire’s Leading Energy Performance Specialists. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHlvphKOQ1P9sB0iSto2iKM3YDqjj-3hnMw3tGkqJgdLtZckNeRNJzPcqQ_sP96V9F2HEw_27jMPihCP8-rAhucOTZWf6BaNx8rAvg2I709bwvegV_wLq0kKUU= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[11] Part L: BRUKL and SBEM Compliance – SEA Consulting. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGlhdW2wrgDcLyBq9sB2Z8P9O70mPwdrKVm1B7btAuYg61xNk75Voeq2zsl0ujOOYsf9SrQSuyiF_E5QI46uvBVyPW6oVmRSOAz8ihSe1UQfwz_dw9zOEEAuVZn_JEGIUGbtdad78-dFKf3oSoXDB5GdIBne-h1NkiKmxMnpJQqWs4OC6FWc4mtFtts8VPz4R38smWsoVaBUqF52zp_zjARYg== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[12] SBEM Calculations – UK Building Compliance. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQErwotGkg98YizpQkKF3T0zzmYhvVzPnKyAMbNsYWK8o0Enome3TaHmOx6ZnOaGY_Yyhk8X57-CnFKhNIIXvgSFyY6HNU8iZ6uYUvdqul1nOEaAokGi3eUg9L1ZgA2gFJiKuZ_Uq73OR32dQZnQfm0fqB0H (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[13] SBEM Calculations: What Are They & Do I Need One? – Building Energy Experts. (2024, April 24). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHItIrRurNgIQtln06POTTMWNnYxGzge7E0BXGVEDarinGQyMbnrxurnQH21DgC8VAqJ6XGi7Y90HIS2OyG_pg84ou6Bk3JDXUNS2YTg29VdheZDJIqCmDh3C5ovHMcifVaN0Mwpv3euES6YIarv0ndcLQ4fDBYV4jKzvHvz8let11CUgBh3S69tl9OrvK5GOUU (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[14] SBEM Calculations | SBEM Assessment | SBEM Reports – Complete EPC. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHPUEQJ1h1NyKF7oq80v4lZoXpPigAW_nKza1U2Wh5TaswYCvyuXfyIrp8P5D8SadxmOw3Sj17SqDjmPvmPHSxOnuXddYsxu9bZwbM5-q1thrd0lPUV_70AB8T9p-OHCQrHGZK3uDU38DPZTGH0uIcgijW72y-Fk-uH (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[15] Part L Building Regulations: What exactly is a SAP/SBEM calculation? – EAL Consult. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQF59gGSHd9Xfciu61on42GKCOK3dY4FBAoDrHim9P2FWJrs5VFOHsuCkxcvK0TP6CylGJuONGl-BaR8q9Hdb0WPSbWl_Dmo1xPM-L9xNWAHfrUn6n9aHNwXcci7Op9-vcnvhPKEkD-jrZ3MTmGKrjwhTaArk9wbYIKMBYCD3swkyvHhvOlnml73XQzuJO4= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[16] Why Energy Modeling and Simulation Are Key to Building a Net-Zero Future – Desapex. (2025, April 28). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEJYNAybuJReo5lYS5seHqKSWR0Ct9l9AX46dHa-mx4Fu9a1mQBc7_pwHi1YGoQckQhfEseicpvMBg8HWh_d-CObiYf-zB4waQlVICH8KEib8DPGcP4GL14XjhSAsGU6bwCN84K_NpPAfaJvA_LkSqqJi5XRDjWZTUuTqHknHZg7bQ-ucfr_DjpDI8IwMbuN–0b5D656doQnrggwoc8mSmKDVRg9M= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[17] SBEM Calculations: A Comprehensive Overview – Energy Digest. (2025, February 3). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFXYigTtB2ScN8Rdhbmj20aF_rdI-TLdY48pcps_eaf_r-IeVR6Xfn2VRJHl0FE5iGi3BQkfnbT-TKUQRCOCSmOjcsryZsQzQhcXThnZkADQ4yFPQIk13yQvpLkMyP131u3rR_FJLf1pnUq9WXEjk16 (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[18] Steady-state and dynamic simulation – TLK Energy. (2020, April 30). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFdG5VP1CKPFyEWKA3IEOhFI9bSvDGwLsM2QwjBJOf9cyGeKOgW9PjqU-oEaRzwErhjdKpSLS7hygxqFf9HWnYRi3bijxofarSYksle7gdl43hYXJgfJCqG8m8pkuCwxEq3D89vP_xbqasFgUgAcg8xHKvPjeN08ysFv10= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[19] Complying with Part L Building Regulations Volumes 1 & 2 – Stroma. (2024, September 25). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHNXri1qwFqwafSE9o37GoIeexaLQHAbZzahXyCA9Da_U76Ay6wDA165YbcZ8ttaB9Y8aayYgVljuVTPa6RbhsfgeUOCOGSap-lv0PGrg_u6mKEPwxqznH9C9hXdnieFqF2Qke_kWjj14RljbtbDbgcK-1ALeCLPu_iVCMbJCtV0vngDEanOl6p_HzwzJNuCgI= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[20] Dynamic Simulation Modelling Guide – Scottish Futures Trust. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGKBwlK92JvQOydrEMEdmWxvbFCO5uPxZCEKcIiFZYS2fOC9wkpEu3ZJgymIIJdDFQWVXNnr0_P_ABCumoDtnEnn0VBzFsdcZL-qKlLC51FRMdbaqq3p_ESu3A-mJvn8DYg_mvzQ_R5q4ANGO2jtE62_dOWwJUU–5PSzaLuxXNFy8yiI5malH0EiHjQ3UpiL2V20trWTeoOjDUTl8oZanVU1LBKUA= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[21] Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM ), shower waste water heat recovery in non-dwellings – Recoup WWHRS. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHBP8z2f2XMCMk8QQSApYneZ_dE6-IsiSJxd39pwZKTd8-wp1QJrN6hWf2FfYWKwuQ3sxO2ke27myxSU3IKgJw3oYWi0W_nOpNpgEQMAQ9UAHaieGn-eYr654zjiHIZ (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[22] Part L, SBEM & What you need to know to get your building to pass. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFUCvgWJOVW82bNOIGZVs7zwo08Hj7O6UOgJZB4i2X2DPpHN4lz3EkpLihDvA_STddeJBICb2bvtOEKd6F0i8rcpQPVd0MzpGwaGpY548JpPsOIp_mZOkJIsc-OYRoIAsrRVtfua42uo1x0NhasDf1eZAv_9_k88azSNirRf9pvoHTvhBEuHh2h (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[23] Modeling Low Energy Demand Futures for Buildings: Current State and Research Needs. (2023, November 13). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQG8eG58l-j2mhGVtXRk7uOw5LLKTNXyWzyRcPgNnw6mIk4fl1pAgQgTbtTN6N7c3xNrj2PwBvAXjuO02MXllz8N-abHbfpX1CE49v8sSH6Xik2O9Htgz8p4WC_FoUwaMpdVq0FYEDoW7zhdRAgek1iwn5d8siKbPVd6iKc6_bs1w8Rqfa42EGPXmS4TZqTD (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[24] 5 Calibration of Energy Simulation Models on a Building Stock Level using Actual Energy Consumption Data – A+BE | Architecture and the Built Environment. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEaMZUnAjFJIpNwJHS9n9j8udi74hAgNldBzwS1-8zeQ1kZGdWr7Rasks1CgFz9ODsmBsjPyUNUBMDVm_iG_8ZaF0KYLzoqJ24UzUqU3YNCJR_jScxseTTvG71MyU0-jEbTpZy60Jl5tvvOSyW3RCAmkQ== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[25] Contrasting the Capabilities of Building Energy Performance Simulation Programs. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH4HKQQ5LM3_WvOXcIFV1_qdNjwMT-9kDQQFHRJDBh8eHUIn-F31Pi5SXY3phIpJyfJ-BarDp1BaJboTKvWB1d7g_JTrgJPJosnBTvfeBAzN3jJoBWVowGZDh5KwAoxefdroydTvMXiC9EpkvnWR1q_ulR_m00rqebGyXuSpOBPgVjgTdr_SghT6DQzKKlwkYDW_trZ0a8KWluYoDH8GUCq16J_GWcN37_VPOTysK2ushoLel3tpOpFWt2thtQ= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[26] Building for the Future – considering future weather and extremes in assessing building energy efficiency. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHR0Q5MkYIYQBE75oTF3v-sNpLh8xIAjvVjrIVbMLXbIvpMUfSiUwV5kJc4oRk0ls2AbdGYM4GzEAHlSLa5lgtDY2Sp0Neep1U66WFCh2x7y61JowKwJheoNv11xLYmUvMEASjjwHEi5wo7wEqDOBpPQMx4fQFc_4tQjzqx1KdDaWFY5EhK5u7_w0wGAlk_pa8lDoaF_rDCEZdHLdRmtjYbUl-gPACCNxBx91IffPbPk1a3Nperm13f4nqAe7Iz83s2fiM= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[27] Development, Validation, and Application of Building Energy Simulation Models for Livestock Houses: A Systematic Review – MDPI. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHtvwFhZT5g-I5T12wten6KYKL25QamrGugPTrvgS-MmZ4XY3XCyl8ppH25xlV_RgSR7CEm33p2I55s3S8JUdWIn6ITQIWRQxOrxwR1YPNOFKxE7qFf32rtvaqs2hFCQFyEgjs= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[28] SBEM Calculations | Up Energy. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFwGKEBcmPbtm6KjJEnJzdSwGLL59uWWjDQbGatxNiZ3LI3oGTdwCCh6_x2dRNctxpLDpPtefR1qMDtWMJhsqS6yVAA4sh1zffMssSC0CZALJE56kVAHU5naRnaQFVOek8yEo-zcWO7zP8f1ntNbMat5rmB3OUuVF4cwFozGdWfetPJog4r (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[29] SBEM Calculations Explained | What is SBEM? | Guide 2025 – Purple Energy Solutions. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQH5eHT69bRg2B4zbGr0jEoR56VXbI4d0v6HR8VhDX0EJJcrcnwyygi7pdE2A6wKX1fQqjNnJkhrg6HfZgW_GwLRW7lNg2GllC_bdyjN1VYaftPDR3yiX3b4mBj8RlY4IA== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[30] SBEM Calculations: Your Roadmap To Energy-Efficient Commercial Buildings. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQED-qYCSIzaSAHh9Rkad484kZeXRrMZ3xgUcEueXtu8NjPC7N_S7vkZ3OCMbE9FIj3eukTa_dhuwOqrGnUiz-L5Kt_cm9_L9Fv6_ovkXIOW0P1dUX7F0Z-OpyY_IGFO3uiwvz0_BHI42n04fBzc9oQmxH5bFY48Ztp9uCT6coT29DsF-OilDpIK46GN2Z6h8A== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[31] What is an SBEM Assessment and Why Does Your Building Need It? – Focus 360 Energy. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHz2ZnuCXS1LU7wvGWgwbCfBR6xlO9Vr5gazjQ0s3jybsv58WfVbroyoe_LQp3-ktnZsjdDfMrXyYYIwhhS1Q73XGdNUiKlY-jI5BqfgQstlJ8QDbPJ4X7IzOntiA2z_gRu_af1kzBf38IzBlbJef3uDc9dXmsbcAUy5NuHdMP_cgXW6EcFhuTg1UVkvLBtA5ssb9bV3g== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[32] SBEM Elements Adjacent to Unheated Spaces Calculation Tool – SEAI. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHBSaZwAuD2_3T_kAuVpXK-Az2oycANaIToVrTpVMQog28rxAXf6Z69Xcz_A2J3Min94Kh_eAYhotfpVtR9y8r0AVl8ssdDVKDtBaNNV8jg8h0OvU9RjbRs19TTvpmgLa42EG03Ykt3ddhHp3OxafL5I46W2X59lTmqdh6P08m-aT01KU1OFm9JBUocytkimiudabCwjow9bkgniXH_FQ== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[33] SAP and SBEM Calculations – PDA – Peter Deer & Associates. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFOZMjo_imPNnIy9hAjjK9NMH45e_G67MsqxxLT0nOpJKuB5eN4GtpjsGY9EtsoC1u_QJ4qdDVmxtTVKgqgm4lfcxfFDa37WnpN0SLYL3Y-60ersU4TPkwsHPDCtumD4YlBhKH15JaoJuvd6d0y2ra6GpiueHA= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[34] Meeting MEES: Are SBEMs a quick EPC fix, or energy efficiency obstacle? | SMS. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHhAHSJ-u7bnck5NP9ROjUIkovEjrxa7dBnbfgY64_5Odnx9Hx8EfDoG-Kn5sEpb2pEk_CidQwhgEjTNTiauuo__shVALUexdjBuwWkLqwdEy6NI9ULgk5lv_eanmK4YJijaoEr-D0hvHdwWI8QERqju5kB6BQXfHy4jdQT5ZTx_kM2tXRx0kmXDUIO4M_HfBh0jFd4HG1BQiwlXOFzF5pBCjI= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[35] EPC’s, SAP and BRUKL – A Guide for Planners and Building Control – Build Energy. (2019, May 15). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHQwo06rNdQKZnIc45Ozi2qo7-oBoFYMZj808WzAEQmUGzJhxSebufLBRhjNCc1OFfTD1BQNGwh4QClubelrNDHQkRH8jJUi9KCsAn3MPI0EsU-hl-RlkUvGqSiWIB1TwLFa70azSsj06VQWMrVuNwcf3er8gqQFIo-tpEwtuyHOZ-O5tfquxczsE6RbOByJAR6pQlIFconmWnKlkeWt-BlS8mdykNu3HWob5Sev-Ifjw== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[36] SBEM for New Build – Build Energy. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEfbRGBillOUVD2qVhw4U0aR35dgTLkyj_VL2_uQK1qyFcjNJBiGhXRZw48FRGCwMLlCfvptQU8cHLFYccFSlbk4CpSH2riRc3WFBxbY-Lh5aXXZ_Rrdaf-z3L7TtOgR4vx3uIUM8qQjvOesm-JmnYsdPrF_xkNfXtp5uIhgDfSV1bjZyO7UJ8DrDbjrkc= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[37] Commercial SBEM Calculations For New Builds – Focus 360 Energy. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFAbjUQz0L3r6qXvRdqWYd-8Em6YhIeSI-w3oSKlwl7-GKSVPYKw9WV0NSqJJ8GuxLykqaFeRPfMERuZteQuN98rl-7f4V7VnvzqKs_0Y6dZfGOLYx0e0WTHfowC8h6fNEleA6nceChyF3KBT8s29I3YSxZdidQ2xrZFYnlNWZRy4glQUW_aMmQLwy_qfCa7yl3UnBUAQ== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[38] Commercial SBEM Calculations | EnergyReady. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQEL_Npai9K2fzbGp5OaJWUTkbHW2Sov7tLP7SOH9g-eKdIQV2WbVyba23FIzTykbVis0MJF8aXiRNmA7r8tdLoJBAZ5ZOdBdkQe_jwM22ZqXnbmzw5F7Y4_eol_UzTmZpvUfyR17dw7tD8= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[39] SBEM Calculations for New Commercial Buildings – PHH Environmental UK Limited. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQExdsojH_ssC5eHpL1uRjU91TGtf2WWEVwTWw_UGt2Fw4itFNSMHZBbRE0uOk_tgZXl6pyRr_j8RSKYoTS27lCt_Ij19tEPOGZXxemp0-VW6PSSF8x3PnGeChTRKPtYhsCNt2KbhBNns41LoldnWvk3Wcwm5EIKOdVMbG6CAw== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[40] SBEM – Your Questions Answered – Briary Energy | SAP Reports. https://vertexaisearch.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQHaByv2lwucTOpGyt6zvzAsuA0PY3N-W-EgNVYg3_A0Qy76V5jJBXLJRQbqLKOfSg6yZyQbPM-l2o1UKWeHEBPdfGwbPX0K6U3RdhUqNmyqOMR90X8jV4uSO3RpjjNZ8UDYA8y1qFS4h1TwyJgCtA== (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[41] Comprehensive guide to SBEM calculations – Gradwell Group. (2025, May 19). https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQFHlsc0RinIA0LEv14-ODTbw-PiArGTXI4Q7In_m-Fhm4J-VPOpK6GUmfSCDgFtjeKC2CqGZBS9NoEYHSuLyah6B9Sag-BnFuSh34gAyuMDDBRdkecFxYHIDtmvhiOAQjG_WEhvgoDw5364AEGC32A3rCsmh1lF8R8gxYQI7WUVPdtn7pDK5_Q= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[42] SBEM Calculations | Expert Assessments For Energy Efficiency. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQGJTx2fwKailO6xl-YAyiKdGT7gDK938KFLs4M9afOzYcUkLELdoCcOqtZ03oSA3haopUFaZS4iJghClqn4KnoPrGZjAB42Q340oTsAd6goNfwp32pTRma-tY-eaLWOXBXCRYQJsrivXYQ= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).
[43] Why are my results different when I run both SBEM and ApacheSim methods?. https://vertexaisearch.cloud.google.com/grounding-api-redirect/AUZIYQE2MiNG7gx6Ln4VI58liBEVba4XVOz116V2MN2-Z0twj2yOO_d3XsLeEs8wb2Q7IRPy-ZSrYpY139nbnQFRs1BXUJCrJ2BtIo2JtPxYwdBQZcAUKsqFPRGtskLzftBixsLELcvexpCmft8Fq3C7F022EM6LPKB7aVm_JgR_IRs643Htm-wtcRxn8Ao= (accessed Jun. 29, 2025).