Dynamic Thermal Modelling: An Advanced Framework for Overheating Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Complex Building Designs

Abstract

Dynamic Thermal Modelling (DTM) has emerged as an indispensable and highly sophisticated analytical tool for the comprehensive assessment and proactive mitigation of overheating risks in contemporary building designs. Its particular utility becomes evident when addressing structures characterised by intricate geometries, innovative material applications, or non-standard operational profiles, scenarios where conventional, simplified analytical methods often prove inadequate. This comprehensive research report systematically dissects the technical intricacies of DTM, commencing with a foundational exploration of its underlying methodologies and progressing through a detailed examination of the advanced software platforms available for its execution. A significant emphasis is placed upon the paramount importance of meticulously accurate input parameters, the nuanced interpretation of the rich and often complex output datasets generated, and the critical, iterative role DTM plays within the design optimisation cycle. The ultimate objective is to elucidate how DTM not only facilitates the achievement of stringent thermal comfort standards but also ensures robust compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks, thereby safeguarding occupant well-being and enhancing overall building resilience in a changing climate.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction: The Imperative of Thermal Performance in Modern Architecture

Overheating within buildings constitutes a multifaceted and increasingly pressing challenge, posing substantial risks that extend beyond mere discomfort to critically impact occupant health, cognitive function, and overall well-being. In the context of a rapidly warming global climate and the concurrent drive towards highly insulated, airtight building envelopes – ostensibly designed for energy efficiency – the incidence of elevated internal temperatures during warm periods has become a significant concern. This is particularly salient in residential dwellings, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions where vulnerable populations spend extended periods.

In the United Kingdom, recognition of this escalating issue culminated in the introduction of Part O (Overheating) of the Building Regulations in June 2022. This regulatory amendment specifically aims to minimise overheating risks in new residential developments by stipulating criteria for acceptable internal temperatures during the warmest periods of the year. However, the simplified methods outlined within Part O, such as the ‘Simplified Method’ based on cross-ventilation and façade orientation, are inherently limited in their capacity to accurately capture the thermal complexities inherent in non-standard, geometrically intricate, or functionally diverse building designs. These simplifications, while pragmatic for generic cases, often overlook crucial nuances such as specific window-to-wall ratios, internal massing, dynamic shading strategies, or the bespoke operational profiles of occupants [1].

It is within this context of escalating thermal challenges and the limitations of prescriptive regulatory approaches that Dynamic Thermal Modelling (DTM) distinguishes itself as an advanced, computationally intensive, yet profoundly insightful analytical paradigm. DTM transcends the static calculations of simplified methods by enabling detailed, time-series simulations that dynamically account for a myriad of interdependent factors influencing a building’s thermal performance throughout an entire year, or even multiple years, under varying climatic conditions and operational scenarios. By embracing DTM, designers and engineers can gain a nuanced understanding of heat flows, predict internal temperatures with significantly greater precision, and proactively implement design interventions that ensure optimal thermal comfort and robust regulatory compliance.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Methodologies and Underlying Principles in Dynamic Thermal Modelling

At its core, Dynamic Thermal Modelling involves the creation of a high-fidelity digital representation of a building, or a specific zone within it, to simulate its complex thermal behaviour over defined time intervals. Unlike steady-state calculations that assume constant conditions, DTM is inherently transient, meaning it calculates heat flows and temperature changes at discrete time steps (often sub-hourly, e.g., 5-minute or 15-minute intervals) over extended periods, typically a full annual cycle. This temporal resolution allows for the capture of dynamic phenomena such as thermal mass charging and discharging, diurnal temperature swings, and the fluctuating nature of solar gains and internal heat loads [2].

The fundamental physics underpinning DTM involves the numerical solution of energy balance equations for each thermal zone within the building model. This includes accounting for:

• Conduction: Heat transfer through solid building elements (walls, roofs, floors, glazing) based on material properties (thermal conductivity, density, specific heat capacity) and temperature differences across their thickness.
• Convection: Heat transfer between surfaces and the adjacent air, both internal and external, influenced by air movement patterns. This includes natural convection (driven by buoyancy) and forced convection (driven by fans or wind).
• Radiation: Solar radiation entering through fenestration, absorbed by internal surfaces, and re-radiated. Long-wave radiation exchange between internal surfaces and between internal surfaces and the outdoor environment. Solar geometry calculations are critical, determining the angle and intensity of incident solar radiation at different times of the day and year.
• Airflow: The movement of air into, out of, and within the building, driven by pressure differences (wind, stack effect) and mechanical systems. This includes infiltration, exfiltration, and cross-ventilation, which are crucial for heat removal and fresh air supply.
• Internal Heat Gains: Heat generated within the building from occupants, lighting, electrical equipment, and hot water services.

Standardised Methodologies: CIBSE TM59 and Beyond

To ensure consistency, reliability, and comparability across different projects and practitioners, standardised methodologies for overheating risk assessment using DTM have been developed by professional bodies. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) Technical Memorandum TM59: ‘Design methodology for the assessment of overheating risk in homes’ (2017) is a seminal document in the UK context, providing a rigorous and widely adopted framework for this purpose [3].

TM59 outlines specific procedures and criteria for:

• Modelling Internal Heat Gains: It provides default profiles and magnitudes for heat gains from occupants, lighting, and equipment for typical domestic settings. These profiles account for varying occupancy patterns throughout the day and week, acknowledging that heat gains are not constant.
• Occupancy Patterns: TM59 specifies realistic occupancy schedules to represent how residents interact with their homes, influencing both heat gains and the operation of natural ventilation strategies.
• Ventilation Strategies: It details how natural ventilation should be modelled, including assumptions for window opening schedules (e.g., windows open when internal temperature exceeds a threshold and external conditions permit), trickle ventilation, and the impact of cross-ventilation. For mechanically ventilated dwellings, it specifies minimum ventilation rates.
• Weather Data: TM59 mandates the use of specific Design Summer Year (DSY) weather files, derived from CIBSE TM49, which represent hot, dry, and moderate summer conditions based on historical data adjusted for climate change projections [4]. These DSY files are critical for simulating the building’s response to extreme summer temperatures.
• Output Criteria: TM59 defines clear performance criteria (discussed in Section 5) that must be met to demonstrate an acceptable level of overheating risk. These criteria are based on limiting the number of hours and the magnitude by which internal temperatures exceed specified comfort thresholds.

Beyond TM59, other CIBSE publications, such as TM52: ‘Limits for thermal comfort: avoiding overheating in buildings’ (2013), provide broader guidance on thermal comfort assessment for non-residential buildings, establishing criteria based on adaptive thermal comfort models [5]. International standards, such as ISO 7730 (PMV/PPD index) and ASHRAE Standard 55 (Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy), also inform the underlying principles and comfort metrics used in DTM [6, 7]. The robustness of DTM methodologies lies in their ability to integrate these diverse physical principles and industry-standard guidelines into a coherent computational framework, offering a predictive capability far beyond static calculation methods.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Advanced Software Tools for Dynamic Thermal Modelling

The computational demands of DTM necessitate powerful software platforms capable of solving complex heat transfer equations and managing extensive datasets. Over the past decades, a range of sophisticated tools has emerged, each offering unique features, capabilities, and underlying simulation engines. While many share common functionalities, their user interfaces, integration capabilities, and specific optimisation algorithms can vary significantly. The core of many DTM software packages is an energy simulation engine that performs the detailed hourly or sub-hourly calculations.

3.1. IES Virtual Environment (IES-VE)

IES-VE is a highly comprehensive and integrated suite of building performance analysis tools developed by Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES). It is widely adopted by architects, engineers, and sustainability consultants globally due to its extensive capabilities in simulating various aspects of building performance, including thermal, lighting, energy consumption, and carbon emissions. Its DTM capabilities are particularly robust [8].

• Underlying Engine: IES-VE primarily utilises its proprietary Apache simulation engine, known for its speed and accuracy in transient thermal calculations. It also offers integration with EnergyPlus, a powerful open-source simulation engine developed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), for more advanced or specific analyses.
• Key Features for DTM:
  • Detailed Geometry Modelling: Allows for the import of 2D CAD files (DXF) or 3D models (IDF, gbXML) and enables intuitive 3D modelling of complex building geometries, including intricate façades, shading devices, and multi-zone configurations.
  • Extensive Material Library: Features a vast library of building materials with their associated thermal properties (U-values, thermal mass, solar heat gain coefficients – G-values), and allows for custom material definition.
  • HVAC System Integration: Supports detailed modelling of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems, enabling analysis of their interaction with the building envelope and internal loads. This includes natural ventilation, mechanical ventilation, mixed-mode systems, and active cooling strategies.
  • Advanced Weather Data Handling: Integrates seamlessly with CIBSE-approved Design Summer Year (DSY) weather files (e.g., DSY1, DSY2, DSY3) and future climate datasets (e.g., CIBSE TM49, UKCP18 projections), allowing for robust overheating risk assessment under various climate scenarios.
  • Compliance Tools: Provides specific modules and workflows tailored for compliance with UK Building Regulations Part L and Part O, as well as CIBSE TM52/TM59 assessments, generating compliance reports directly from the simulation results.
  • Visualisation and Reporting: Offers powerful visualisation tools, including 3D temperature maps, annual temperature profiles, and detailed data tables, facilitating clear interpretation and reporting of results.

3.2. Tas (Thermal Analysis Software)

Developed by Environmental Design Solutions Limited (EDSL), Tas is another leading software package specifically designed for high-resolution thermal modelling and energy simulation. It is highly regarded for its precision and flexibility, particularly in the UK market, making it a popular choice for TM59 assessments [9].

• Underlying Engine: Tas utilises its own sophisticated thermal engine, developed over decades, which is optimised for transient heat transfer calculations.
• Key Features for DTM:
  • Full Hourly Analysis: Capable of performing full hourly (or sub-hourly) simulations over an entire year, providing a granular understanding of building performance dynamics.
  • Customisation of Profiles: Offers extensive customisation options for occupancy profiles, internal heat gains, and ventilation strategies, allowing users to accurately reflect diverse operational scenarios.
  • Integration with CIBSE Data: Directly integrates with CIBSE-approved weather files (TM49 DSYs) and CIBSE Guide A data for internal gains, ensuring adherence to recognised industry standards.
  • Natural Ventilation Controls: Provides advanced control logic for natural ventilation, enabling complex window opening schedules based on internal temperature, external temperature, wind speed, and occupant presence.
  • Building Regulations Compliance: Features dedicated modules to streamline compliance with Part L and Part O of the UK Building Regulations, including TM59 reporting.
  • Detailed Results Output: Generates comprehensive outputs including internal air temperatures, operative temperatures, surface temperatures, and heat balance components, crucial for detailed analysis of overheating causes.

3.3. DesignBuilder

DesignBuilder serves as a user-friendly graphical interface (GUI) for the powerful EnergyPlus simulation engine, making advanced building performance simulation more accessible to a broader range of practitioners. It balances ease of use with comprehensive simulation capabilities [10].

• Underlying Engine: DesignBuilder’s core strength lies in its tight integration with EnergyPlus, an extensively validated and highly flexible simulation engine. This allows DesignBuilder to leverage EnergyPlus’s robust computational capabilities for thermal, daylighting, and energy analyses.
• Key Features for DTM:
  • Intuitive Interface: Offers a highly intuitive 3D modelling environment that simplifies the creation of complex building geometries, allowing users to quickly set up and run simulations.
  • Comprehensive Material and Construction Libraries: Provides extensive pre-defined libraries aligned with common construction practices, as well as the ability to create custom material and construction types.
  • Part O and Part L Compliance: Includes specific templates and workflows designed to facilitate compliance with UK Building Regulations Part O (Overheating) and Part L (Energy Efficiency), simplifying the assessment process.
  • Detailed HVAC and Natural Ventilation Modelling: Supports a wide range of HVAC systems and sophisticated natural ventilation strategies, including hybrid systems and advanced control algorithms.
  • Solar Shading Analysis: Allows for the detailed modelling of external and internal shading devices and their impact on solar gains and daylighting.
  • Parametric Analysis and Optimisation: Features powerful tools for parametric studies, allowing users to test the impact of varying design parameters (e.g., window size, insulation levels) on building performance, which is invaluable for iterative design optimisation.

While these three are prominent, other tools like Trnsys, OpenStudio, and SimScale also offer DTM capabilities, often catering to more niche or research-intensive applications. The choice of software often depends on project complexity, regulatory requirements, existing skill sets, and specific analytical needs.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

4. The Paramount Importance of Accurate Input Parameters

The axiom ‘garbage in, garbage out’ holds particular resonance in Dynamic Thermal Modelling. The reliability and accuracy of DTM outputs are directly proportional to the precision and representativeness of the input parameters. Even minor inaccuracies in key data points can lead to significant discrepancies in predicted thermal performance, potentially resulting in flawed design decisions or non-compliance [11].

4.1. Building Geometry and Fabric Properties

This category forms the physical envelope of the model and is foundational to accurate heat transfer calculations:

• Dimensions and Orientation: Precise dimensions of rooms, windows, doors, and overall building footprint are critical. The building’s orientation relative to true north directly influences solar gain patterns throughout the day and year. Deviations as small as 5-10 degrees can alter solar exposure significantly.
• Material Properties: Each layer of the building fabric (walls, roofs, floors, glazing) must be defined with accurate thermal properties:
  • Thermal Conductivity (λ or k-value): The rate at which heat passes through a material. Lower values indicate better insulation.
  • Density (ρ): Mass per unit volume, influencing thermal mass.
  • Specific Heat Capacity (c): The amount of energy required to raise the temperature of a unit mass of the material by one degree. High specific heat capacity contributes to thermal mass, helping to dampen temperature fluctuations.
  • U-value (Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient): Represents the rate of heat loss or gain through a building element. This is a critical input, especially for Part L compliance, and directly impacts conductive heat transfer.
  • Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC or G-value): For glazing, this represents the fraction of incident solar radiation that enters the building as heat. A lower SHGC reduces solar gain, crucial for preventing overheating.
  • Visible Light Transmittance (VLT): For glazing, the fraction of visible light that passes through. While not directly a thermal property, it relates to daylighting and can influence internal lighting gains.
  • Emissivity and Absorptivity: Surface properties that dictate how much radiation a surface emits or absorbs. External surface absorptivity, particularly for roofs and dark façades, greatly influences solar heat absorption.

These properties are typically sourced from manufacturer specifications, national building codes (e.g., approved document L tables), or established material databases. Errors here directly propagate into inaccurate heat loss/gain calculations, impacting internal temperatures.

4.2. Climatic Data: Design Summer Years (DSYs)

The external environment’s influence is paramount. DTM requires detailed, hourly (or sub-hourly) weather data that represents a full annual cycle, including dry-bulb temperature, relative humidity, direct and diffuse solar radiation, wind speed, and wind direction. For overheating assessments, the concept of Design Summer Years (DSYs) is crucial.

• CIBSE TM49 and TM59: These documents specify the use of DSY weather files which are statistically derived from historical meteorological data and then adjusted to reflect future climate change scenarios. The primary DSYs for overheating assessment in the UK are:
  • DSY1 (Typical): Represents a typical warm summer, often based on the 50th percentile of historical summer temperatures.
  • DSY2 (Hot): Represents a hotter than average summer, often based on the 90th or 98th percentile of historical temperatures, designed to stress-test the building’s resilience.
  • DSY3 (Probable Warm): Represents a generally warm, but not excessively hot, summer, often used for assessing comfort in typical conditions.

These files are often available for specific UK regions. The Scottish government, for instance, references the use of DSY1 2020s high emissions scenario, 50th percentile weather data published by CIBSE for overheating risk assessments, highlighting the need to consider future climate projections [12]. The choice of DSY has a profound impact on the predicted overheating risk.

4.3. Internal Gains

Heat generated within the building significantly contributes to the internal heat load. Accurate modelling of these ‘internal gains’ is essential, and CIBSE TM59 provides default values and profiles for residential dwellings [3]:

• Occupancy: Human metabolic activity generates heat. The amount varies with activity level. TM59 specifies a sensible heat gain of 75 W and latent heat gain of 55 W per person for residential occupancy, with defined schedules (e.g., higher occupancy in evenings/weekends, lower during working hours).
• Equipment: Electrical appliances (computers, televisions, kitchen appliances, white goods) dissipate heat into the space. The modelling typically involves specifying power consumption and a diversity factor (the likelihood of all equipment being on simultaneously). For instance, CIBSE TM59 suggests default values for small and large homes.
• Lighting: Heat emitted by light fixtures. This depends on the type of lighting (LEDs are more efficient and emit less heat than incandescent bulbs), wattage, and operating hours. Modern low-energy lighting significantly reduces this contribution compared to older systems.
• Hot Water Systems: Heat dissipated from hot water pipes or storage tanks, particularly in uninsulated or poorly insulated plant rooms.

These gains are not constant but fluctuate throughout the day and week, requiring dynamic profiles rather than static inputs.

4.4. Ventilation Strategies

Ventilation is the primary mechanism for removing excess heat and ensuring air quality. Its accurate representation is critical:

• Natural Ventilation: This is often the first line of defence against overheating. Modelling involves defining:
  • Window Opening Schedules: Manual or automated opening of windows based on internal temperature thresholds, external temperature, wind speed limits, and security considerations (e.g., windows only open during occupied hours or certain periods). TM59 provides guidance on typical opening areas and control logic.
  • Trickle Vents: Small, permanent openings that provide background ventilation.
  • Cross-Ventilation Potential: The ability for air to flow through a building, driven by pressure differences created by wind or stack effect. This requires careful consideration of opening sizes, locations, and internal obstructions.
• Mechanical Ventilation: For buildings with forced air systems, defining air change rates (ACH), supply air temperatures, and fan power is essential.
• Hybrid Ventilation: Systems that switch between natural and mechanical modes based on environmental conditions. Modelling these requires sophisticated control logic.
• Shading Devices: External and internal shading elements significantly impact solar gain:
  • External Shading: Overhangs, fins, brise soleil, external blinds. These are highly effective as they intercept solar radiation before it enters the building. Their geometry, opacity, and operability must be precisely modelled.
  • Internal Shading: Blinds, curtains. While effective at reducing direct glare, they absorb solar radiation within the room, which then dissipates as heat, making them less efficient for heat rejection than external shading.

As seen in a case study for a detached bungalow in Somerset, dynamic thermal modelling proved instrumental in optimising natural ventilation and shading strategies to achieve Part O compliance, demonstrating its practical value in addressing overheating risks proactively [13].

4.5. Occupancy Patterns and User Behaviour

While related to internal gains, the behavioural aspects of occupants warrant separate consideration. How occupants interact with the building’s systems (e.g., opening windows, adjusting blinds, turning lights on/off) can have a profound impact on thermal performance. Sophisticated DTM tools allow for probabilistic or rule-based occupant behaviour models, reflecting the variability and unpredictability of human actions. For instance, some models might simulate window opening based on a statistical probability curve linked to internal temperature and external conditions, rather than a fixed schedule.

In summary, the robustness of a DTM analysis hinges on the meticulous collection, verification, and input of these diverse parameters. A thorough understanding of their interdependencies and potential ranges of variability is paramount for generating credible and actionable simulation results.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Interpreting Complex Outputs and Overheating Criteria

Dynamic Thermal Modelling generates a vast array of output data, typically in hourly or sub-hourly intervals for an entire year. Extracting meaningful insights from this data, particularly concerning overheating risk, requires systematic analysis and a clear understanding of established compliance criteria. Raw temperature profiles alone are insufficient; they must be evaluated against specific comfort thresholds and regulatory limits.

5.1. CIBSE TM52 and TM59 Overheating Criteria

In the UK, the primary framework for assessing overheating risk using DTM is provided by CIBSE TM59 (for residential) and TM52 (for non-residential spaces). These documents define specific performance criteria that must be satisfied to demonstrate an acceptable thermal environment. TM59, in particular, sets out three critical criteria for residential dwellings:

• Criterion 1: Hours Exceeding Thresholds (Living Rooms/Non-Sleeping Spaces)

  • This criterion stipulates that the number of hours where the operative temperature (a temperature that accounts for both air temperature and radiant temperature) in a living room, dining room, or kitchen exceeds the comfort threshold by 1°C or more, should not be greater than 3% of the occupied hours during the period from 1st May to 30th September. The comfort threshold is defined as T_max = 22 + 0.3(T_o – 10), where T_o is the daily mean external temperature. This adaptive comfort approach acknowledges that occupants can tolerate higher internal temperatures when external temperatures are also high.
  • Interpretation: A breach of this criterion indicates frequent discomfort during occupied periods. For example, if a living room is occupied for 16 hours a day (from 07:00 to 23:00) during the 153-day summer period, the total occupied hours are 16 * 153 = 2448 hours. 3% of this is approximately 73 hours. If the simulation shows more than 73 hours above the threshold, the design fails Criterion 1.

• Criterion 2: Daily Temperature Exceedance (All Spaces)

  • This criterion requires that the operative temperature in any occupied space (including bedrooms) should not exceed the comfort threshold (T_max) by more than 4°C on any single day during the period 1st May to 30th September. This is a measure of the severity of overheating on extreme days.
  • Interpretation: A single instance of T_op exceeding T_max by more than 4°C indicates severe overheating. This criterion is particularly important as it prevents occasional, but very uncomfortable, spikes in temperature, even if the overall percentage of hours above threshold is low. This also applies to sleeping areas.

• Criterion 3: ‘Cool Room’ Compliance (Sleeping Areas)

  • This criterion is specific to bedrooms and aims to ensure comfortable sleeping conditions. It states that the operative temperature in a bedroom must not exceed 26°C for more than 1% of the annual hours between 22:00 and 07:00 (the sleeping period). This is a fixed threshold, not an adaptive one, reflecting the lower tolerance for high temperatures during sleep.
  • Interpretation: Given 9 hours of sleeping period for 365 days, this equates to 3285 hours annually. 1% of this is approximately 32.85 hours. If a bedroom exceeds 26°C for more than 33 hours during sleeping periods throughout the year, it fails this criterion. This is often the most challenging criterion to meet in highly insulated new dwellings, especially those with limited ventilation options.

Studies comparing dynamic thermal models with actual measurements in test houses have highlighted discrepancies, with models sometimes predicting higher peak temperatures and larger diurnal swings than observed [14]. This underscores the importance of not just interpreting outputs, but also critically evaluating model calibration and the inherent uncertainties.

5.2. Beyond Regulatory Compliance: Deeper Interpretations

While meeting the TM59 criteria is essential for regulatory compliance, a deeper interpretation of DTM outputs can provide invaluable insights for design optimisation:

• Hourly Temperature Profiles: Visualising the hourly operative and air temperatures for each zone alongside external temperatures allows designers to identify specific times of day or night when overheating occurs, and its magnitude. This helps in pinpointing the likely cause (e.g., afternoon solar gain, evening thermal mass discharge, insufficient night purge).
• Diurnal Temperature Swings: The difference between daily maximum and minimum temperatures within a space. A large diurnal swing can indicate poor thermal mass utilisation or inadequate night-time cooling.
• Heat Balance Components: Many DTM software tools can output a detailed heat balance for each zone, breaking down the heat gains and losses from various sources: solar radiation, internal gains, conduction through fabric, ventilation, infiltration, and HVAC systems. This is an extremely powerful diagnostic tool, revealing the dominant heat gain pathways (e.g., excessive solar gain through windows, high internal gains from equipment, insufficient ventilation) and guiding mitigation strategies.
• Sensitivity Analysis: By running multiple simulations with small variations in key input parameters (e.g., slightly lower SHGC glass, increased night-time ventilation rate), designers can quantify the impact of each variable on overheating risk. This helps prioritise design interventions based on their effectiveness and cost-benefit.
• Comfort Metrics: Beyond simple temperature, DTM can calculate more sophisticated comfort metrics like Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) based on ISO 7730, which account for air temperature, radiant temperature, air velocity, humidity, metabolic rate, and clothing insulation [6]. These provide a more holistic understanding of occupant thermal sensation.
• Simulation Resolution: The concept of ‘Simulation Resolution’ refers to the precision with which the model captures and quantifies the thermal response. Understanding this resolution aids modellers in assessing the reliability of their predictions and the robustness of compliance demonstrations, particularly when dealing with marginal pass/fail scenarios [14].

Interpreting these complex outputs requires not just technical proficiency with the software but also a strong understanding of building physics and thermal comfort principles. The ability to translate numerical data into actionable design insights is where the true value of DTM lies.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

6. The Indispensable Role in Iterative Design Optimization

Dynamic Thermal Modelling is not merely a compliance check at the end of the design process; rather, it is an integral, iterative tool that can profoundly influence and refine design decisions from concept to detailed design. Its predictive capability allows designers to test hypotheses, quantify the impact of different strategies, and proactively mitigate overheating risks, thereby avoiding costly retrofits or compromised occupant comfort post-occupancy.

6.1. Early Design Stage: Strategic Decisions

At the conceptual and schematic design stages, DTM provides critical feedback on fundamental building strategies:

• Building Orientation and Massing: Simulating different orientations can reveal optimal alignments that minimise solar heat gain during summer while maximising passive solar heating in winter. The overall massing (compact vs. sprawling) influences surface area exposure and heat exchange with the environment.
• Façade Design and Fenestration: DTM can evaluate the impact of window-to-wall ratios, window sizes, and strategic placement on solar gain, daylighting, and ventilation potential. It can compare different glazing types (e.g., low-e coatings, different SHGCs) to find the optimal balance between light transmission, views, and heat gain reduction.
• Thermal Mass Integration: Early decisions on the use of exposed thermal mass (e.g., concrete slabs, heavy internal walls) can be informed by DTM, demonstrating how it can absorb and later release heat, dampening internal temperature swings. The model can identify where thermal mass is most effective and how it interacts with night-time cooling strategies.

6.2. Mid-Stage: Material Selection and System Integration

As the design progresses, DTM assists in refining specific material and system choices:

• Insulation Levels: While higher insulation generally reduces heat loss in winter, in summer it can trap heat, exacerbating overheating if not combined with effective heat rejection strategies. DTM helps find the optimal balance.
• Shading Device Optimisation: Detailed modelling of external shading elements (overhangs, fins, louvres, brise soleil) allows designers to optimise their geometry, depth, and angle to effectively block unwanted summer sun while still allowing winter sun penetration and maintaining views. Automated or operable shading systems can also be simulated for their dynamic response.
• Ventilation Strategy Refinement: DTM is crucial for designing effective natural ventilation strategies, testing the impact of different window opening sizes, locations, and control logic (e.g., automated night purge via trickle vents, cross-ventilation through opposing windows). For mechanically ventilated buildings, it helps size systems and optimise air change rates to meet thermal comfort and air quality needs without excessive energy use.

6.3. Late Stage: Control Logic and Mitigation Measures

In the detailed design phase, DTM fine-tunes the operational aspects and verifies the efficacy of specific mitigation measures:

• Control System Logic: Simulating the control logic for natural ventilation (when windows open/close), shading (when blinds deploy), and HVAC systems (thermostat setpoints, fan speeds) ensures that these systems operate optimally to maintain comfort.
• Passive Mitigation Strategies: DTM can quantify the benefits of various passive measures such as enhanced thermal mass, natural cross-ventilation, stack effect ventilation, evaporative cooling from green roofs or water features, and reflective surfaces (e.g., cool roofs) [15].
• Active Cooling Systems: If passive strategies are insufficient, DTM helps in accurately sizing and selecting active cooling systems (e.g., air conditioning, chilled beams) by predicting the peak cooling loads and annual energy consumption. This avoids over-sizing, which leads to higher capital and operational costs, and under-sizing, which results in discomfort.
• Regulatory Compliance Demonstration: Throughout the iterative process, DTM provides documented evidence that the evolving design is on track to meet or exceed regulatory requirements, such as Part O of the UK Building Regulations. This proactive approach minimises the risk of redesigns late in the project, as exemplified by the Somerset bungalow case study where DTM provided regulatory peace of mind by confirming Part O compliance [13].

By embedding DTM into the iterative design process, architects and engineers can make data-driven decisions, resulting in buildings that are not only aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound but also inherently comfortable, resilient to climate change, and energy-efficient. This approach fosters a truly integrated design workflow where performance considerations are as fundamental as form and function.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Challenges and Future Directions in Dynamic Thermal Modelling

Despite its significant advantages and increasing adoption, Dynamic Thermal Modelling is not without its challenges. Addressing these limitations is crucial for advancing the efficacy and broader application of DTM in the built environment sector.

7.1. Current Challenges

• Model Validation and the ‘Performance Gap’: A persistent challenge is ensuring that simulation models accurately reflect real-world conditions and performance. As observed in studies comparing models and measurements, simulated peak temperatures can sometimes exceed measured values, indicating that models may over-predict overheating or that real-world occupant behaviour and microclimatic variations are difficult to capture perfectly [14]. This ‘performance gap’ between predicted and actual performance arises from various factors, including:
  • Simplifications in Model Inputs: Assumptions about material properties, construction quality, air tightness, and system efficiencies.
  • Uncertainties in Occupant Behaviour: Human interaction with windows, blinds, and thermostats is highly variable and often differs from predefined schedules.
  • Microclimate Effects: Localised wind patterns, urban heat island effects, and shading from surrounding buildings may not be fully captured by regional weather files.
  • Post-Occupancy Changes: Alterations to the building or its use after completion.
• Data Quality and Availability: The reliability of DTM simulations is critically dependent on the quality, completeness, and accuracy of input data. Obtaining precise data for all parameters – especially for existing buildings or complex materials – can be challenging and time-consuming. Lack of robust manufacturer data, reliance on generic assumptions, or errors in data transcription can significantly compromise output validity.
• Complexity and Cost: High-resolution DTM requires specialised expertise in building physics, thermal comfort principles, and proficiency with complex software tools. The time and resources invested in creating detailed models, running multiple simulations (especially for optimisation studies), and interpreting extensive outputs can be substantial. This can be a barrier for smaller projects or firms with limited budgets or access to trained personnel.
• Interoperability: While improving, seamless data exchange between DTM software and other building information modelling (BIM) platforms or architectural design software remains a challenge. Manual data entry or conversion can introduce errors and inefficiencies.

7.2. Future Directions and Research Areas

Addressing the current challenges and enhancing the capabilities of DTM will involve advancements across several fronts:

• Improved Validation Techniques and Performance Feedback: Future research should focus on developing more rigorous and standardised methods for validating DTM models against real-world building performance data. This includes:
  • Enhanced Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE): Integrating DTM with POE frameworks to collect empirical data on internal temperatures, energy consumption, and occupant feedback to calibrate and refine models.
  • Sensor Integration: Utilising a denser network of IoT sensors in buildings to provide continuous, high-resolution performance data for real-time model calibration and anomaly detection.
  • Digital Twins: Developing ‘digital twins’ of buildings – virtual replicas continuously updated with real-time sensor data – that can be used for dynamic model validation, predictive maintenance, and operational optimisation.
• Integration with Building Information Modelling (BIM): The synergy between DTM and BIM holds immense potential. Future developments should aim for truly bidirectional data exchange, allowing DTM models to directly leverage the rich geometric, material, and system data within BIM models, and conversely, feeding DTM insights back into the BIM environment for design refinement. This would significantly reduce manual effort, enhance data consistency, and enable performance-driven design workflows from the earliest stages. IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) standards play a critical role in facilitating this interoperability.
• Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI and ML algorithms can revolutionise DTM by:
  • Automated Optimisation: ML can explore vast design parameter spaces more efficiently than traditional parametric studies, identifying optimal solutions for thermal comfort and energy efficiency.
  • Predictive Control: AI-powered predictive control systems, informed by DTM and real-time data, can dynamically adjust building systems (e.g., HVAC, shading, ventilation) to pre-emptively manage internal conditions.
  • Reduced Simulation Time: AI could potentially learn from complex DTM simulations to create faster, surrogate models for quick performance estimations during early design phases.
• Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) and Probabilistic Modelling: Given the inherent uncertainties in input parameters (e.g., future weather, occupant behaviour, material properties), future DTM should increasingly incorporate UQ methods. This involves running probabilistic simulations (e.g., Monte Carlo simulations) to generate a range of possible outcomes and assign probabilities to overheating risks, rather than relying on single-point predictions. This provides designers with a more realistic assessment of risk.
• More Sophisticated Occupant Behaviour Models: Moving beyond fixed schedules, DTM needs to integrate more nuanced and dynamic models of occupant interaction with building systems, drawing from behavioural science and empirical studies.
• Urban Microclimate Integration: Incorporating localised microclimate data, including urban heat island effects, street canyon wind patterns, and the impact of surrounding buildings/vegetation, will enhance the accuracy of DTM in dense urban environments.
• Integration with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Combining DTM with LCA tools can provide a holistic view of a building’s environmental impact, considering not just operational energy and thermal comfort but also embodied energy and carbon from materials throughout the building’s lifecycle. This supports truly sustainable design decisions.
• Enhanced User Training and Education: As DTM tools become more powerful, there is an increasing need for comprehensive training and educational resources for practitioners to ensure they can effectively utilise these tools, correctly interpret outputs, and apply the insights to real-world design challenges.

These future directions collectively point towards a more integrated, intelligent, and accurate application of DTM, enabling the creation of buildings that are truly resilient, comfortable, and sustainable in the face of evolving environmental and societal demands.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

8. Conclusion

Dynamic Thermal Modelling stands as a pivotal and increasingly indispensable component in the contemporary design, assessment, and operation of buildings, particularly those characterised by complex architectural forms, innovative material palettes, or demanding performance requirements. By offering profound and detailed insights into a building’s transient thermal performance, DTM fundamentally transforms the design process from a largely prescriptive endeavour into a data-driven, performance-optimised discipline. It facilitates the proactive identification of overheating risks, enabling architects and engineers to strategically implement both passive and active mitigation measures – ranging from optimised building orientation and shading devices to advanced natural ventilation strategies and judiciously sized cooling systems.

Beyond merely predicting internal temperatures, DTM supports the creation of environments that consistently achieve high standards of thermal comfort, thereby safeguarding occupant health, enhancing productivity, and improving overall well-being. Furthermore, its rigorous analytical capabilities provide the essential evidence base required to demonstrate robust compliance with evolving national and international regulatory standards, such as the UK’s Building Regulations Part O, ensuring that new constructions meet stringent performance benchmarks from their inception.

As climate change continues to exert pressures on the built environment and as architectural designs become increasingly ambitious, the role of DTM will only continue to expand. Ongoing advancements in modelling techniques, the development of more intuitive and powerful software tools, and the integration of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and Building Information Modelling (BIM) promise to further enhance the efficacy, accessibility, and predictive accuracy of DTM. These advancements will be instrumental in bridging the ‘performance gap’ and fostering the development of truly resilient, energy-efficient, and human-centric buildings for future generations.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] HM Government. (2022). The Building Regulations 2010: Approved Document O – Overheating. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/approved-document-o-overheating

[2] CIBSE. (2007). CIBSE Guide A: Environmental design (8th ed.). Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

[3] CIBSE. (2017). TM59: Design methodology for the assessment of overheating risk in homes. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

[4] CIBSE. (2020). TM49: Probabilistic climate files for overheating assessments. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

[5] CIBSE. (2013). TM52: Limits for thermal comfort: Avoiding overheating in buildings. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.

[6] ISO. (2005). ISO 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. International Organization for Standardization.

[7] ASHRAE. (2017). ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.

[8] IESVE. (n.d.). Improve Building Performance with Dynamic Thermal Simulation Tools. Retrieved from https://www.iesve.com/discoveries/view/44247/dynamic-thermal-simulation-tools

[9] EDSL. (n.d.). TM59 Compliance – EDSL. Retrieved from https://www.edsl.net/tm59-compliance/

[10] Building Energy Experts. (n.d.). Dynamic Thermal Modelling – Housing Development, Somerset. Retrieved from https://buildingenergyexperts.co.uk/case-studies/dynamic-thermal-modelling/

[11] Lomas, K. J., & Eppel, H. (1992). The sensitivity of calculated building thermal performance to uncertainties in climate data. Building and Environment, 27(2), 173-195.

[12] CIBSE. (2022). Research report: Overheating risk in new homes. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/research-report-overheating-risk-new-homes/pages/3/

[13] Building Energy Experts. (n.d.). Dynamic Thermal Modelling – Housing Development, Somerset. Retrieved from https://buildingenergyexperts.co.uk/case-studies/dynamic-thermal-modelling/

[14] Roberts, B. M., Allinson, D., Diamond, S., Abel, B., Das Bhaumik, C., Khatami, N., & Lomas, K. J. (2019). Predictions of summertime overheating: Comparison of dynamic thermal models and measurements in synthetically occupied test houses. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 40(4), 512–552.

[15] CIBSE Journal. (2018). Module 122: Applying ventilation to mitigate home overheating. CIBSE Journal. Retrieved from https://www.cibsejournal.com/cpd/modules/2018-02-ven/