The Evolving Landscape of Real Estate: Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Stranded Assets

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

The concept of stranded assets – defined as assets that have suffered unanticipated or premature devaluations or conversions to liabilities – has emerged as a paramount concern in the real estate sector. This phenomenon is profoundly driven by the accelerating integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into investment decisions, regulatory frameworks, and market expectations. This comprehensive research paper delves into the multifaceted nature of stranded assets within the real estate domain, offering a granular examination of their identification, the intricate financial implications they present, advanced predictive modeling techniques for assessing stranding risk, and strategic, proactive mitigation measures for real estate investors, developers, and asset managers. By meticulously exploring these critical dimensions, this paper aims to furnish a profound and actionable understanding of both the challenges and the latent opportunities inherent in managing stranded assets, thereby contributing to the development of a more resilient and sustainable built environment.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The global real estate sector, a colossal industry with an estimated value exceeding 300 trillion USD, representing approximately half of the world’s total wealth, is currently undergoing unprecedented transformations. These shifts are primarily instigated by an confluence of global sustainability imperatives, rapidly evolving regulatory landscapes, and profound shifts in market demands, largely influenced by a heightened awareness of climate change and social equity. A critical and increasingly urgent consequence of these systemic changes is the widespread emergence of what are termed ‘stranded assets’. These are properties that face imminent obsolescence or significant devaluation due to their inability to adapt to new environmental benchmarks, meet stringent regulatory mandates, or align with burgeoning market preferences for sustainable and resilient infrastructure.

Understanding the complex dynamics of stranded assets is no longer a peripheral concern but an essential strategic imperative for all stakeholders within the real estate ecosystem. This includes institutional investors, property developers, asset managers, lenders, insurers, and policymakers. The trajectory of global decarbonization, coupled with the increasing frequency and intensity of physical climate risks, necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of how real estate assets are valued, developed, and managed over their lifecycle. Failure to adequately address the implications of asset stranding risks not only significant financial losses but also jeopardizes the broader goal of achieving a sustainable and resilient built environment. This paper seeks to unpack these complexities, providing a framework for understanding and addressing this critical challenge.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Defining Stranded Assets in Real Estate

2.1 The Core Concept of Stranding

At its core, a stranded asset in real estate refers to a property that has experienced, or is projected to experience, a significant, unanticipated, and premature devaluation or conversion into a liability. This diminution in value stems from unforeseen shifts in the market, regulatory environment, technological landscape, or physical environment, particularly those related to climate change and broader sustainability transitions. It is crucial to distinguish ‘stranding’ from conventional obsolescence. While traditional obsolescence might occur gradually due to normal wear and tear, changing aesthetics, or shifts in functional requirements, stranding implies a more abrupt and systemic loss of value driven by external, often non-linear, sustainability-related factors. These assets may become economically unviable because they cannot meet new environmental standards, achieve energy efficiency targets, or satisfy evolving market demands for sustainability and resilience (terabee.com).

2.2 Categorizing the Drivers of Stranding Risk

The drivers of stranded assets in real estate can be broadly categorized into three interdependent groups, largely mirroring the framework established by the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) for broader financial assets:

2.2.1 Transition Risks

Transition risks arise from the process of adjustment towards a lower-carbon and more sustainable economy. These are perhaps the most immediate and pervasive drivers of stranding in the real estate sector:

• Policy and Regulatory Risk: Governments globally are enacting increasingly stringent policies aimed at decarbonizing the built environment. This includes, but is not limited to, updated building codes, energy performance mandates (e.g., minimum energy efficiency standards for rental properties), carbon pricing mechanisms, taxes on energy consumption, and disclosure requirements. Properties failing to meet these new standards risk hefty fines, restrictions on leasing or sale, or even demolition orders. For instance, the European Union’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) is a prime example of a regulatory push mandating significant improvements in building energy performance, potentially stranding non-compliant properties across the continent (matheson.com).
• Technological Risk: Rapid advancements in building technologies, smart systems, and renewable energy solutions can render older properties technologically obsolete. Buildings lacking modern energy management systems, advanced HVAC, smart controls, or integrated renewable energy generation capabilities become less competitive and more expensive to operate. The cost of retrofitting these technologies can be prohibitive, leading to devaluation.
• Market and Economic Risk: Shifting tenant and investor preferences towards green, energy-efficient, and healthy buildings creates a dichotomy. Properties that meet these preferences command higher rents, achieve lower vacancy rates, and attract premium valuations (the ‘green premium’). Conversely, properties that do not adapt face reduced demand, longer vacancy periods, lower rents, and declining asset values (the ‘brown discount’). This market segmentation actively contributes to stranding. Moreover, changes in consumer behavior, such as the increased adoption of remote work, have particularly impacted commercial office spaces, accelerating obsolescence for older, less flexible assets.
• Reputational Risk: Companies and investors increasingly face scrutiny from stakeholders (employees, customers, shareholders, regulators) regarding their sustainability performance. Owning or being associated with underperforming or environmentally harmful real estate assets can damage brand reputation, impacting attractiveness to tenants, investors, and talent.

2.2.2 Physical Risks

Physical risks stem directly from the impacts of climate change, which can be categorized into acute and chronic forms:

• Acute Physical Risks: These are event-driven risks, such as increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events. Examples include floods, wildfires, hurricanes, typhoons, heatwaves, and extreme cold snaps. Properties located in areas susceptible to these events face direct damage, disruption to operations, increased insurance premiums, or even uninsurability, leading to significant value loss.
• Chronic Physical Risks: These refer to longer-term shifts in climate patterns, such as rising sea levels, prolonged heatwaves, persistent droughts, and changes in precipitation patterns. These chronic changes can lead to gradual but significant impacts on property viability, including land subsidence, water scarcity, increased cooling costs, and damage to infrastructure.

2.2.3 Litigation Risk

As climate change awareness grows, so does the potential for legal action. Property owners and developers may face lawsuits related to:

• Failure to Disclose Climate Risks: Investors or tenants might sue if they were not adequately informed about climate-related physical or transition risks associated with a property.
• Contribution to Climate Change: Entities perceived to contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions through their operations or portfolio could face legal challenges.
• Misrepresentation of Green Credentials: Claims of sustainability (‘greenwashing’) that prove to be false can lead to legal action and reputational damage.

These interconnected drivers highlight that stranding is not a singular event but a complex process influenced by a multitude of factors, demanding a holistic risk management approach.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Identifying Properties at Risk of Stranding

Proactively identifying properties at risk of becoming stranded is a critical first step towards mitigation and value preservation. This process necessitates a comprehensive, multi-factorial assessment that transcends traditional real estate due diligence. Key areas of evaluation include:

3.1 Regulatory Compliance and Future-Proofing

Properties failing to meet current or, more importantly, anticipated environmental regulations are prime candidates for stranding. The regulatory landscape is dynamic, with a clear global trajectory towards more stringent environmental performance requirements. Key considerations include:

• Energy Performance Standards: Directives such as the European Union’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) are pushing for significant improvements. The EPBD mandates that all new buildings be nearly zero-energy buildings (NZEBs) and sets targets for existing building renovations, including minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for rented or sold properties. Properties with low Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), particularly those in the F or G categories, are at high risk of requiring costly deep retrofits to remain compliant and marketable (matheson.com). Similar regulations are emerging in other jurisdictions, often tied to national Net Zero commitments.
• Carbon Emissions Targets: Many cities and countries are implementing carbon emissions targets, which may translate into direct carbon taxes or limits on operational emissions. Buildings with high carbon footprints risk incurring significant financial penalties or facing restrictions on their use.
• Water Management Regulations: Increasing awareness of water scarcity is leading to stricter regulations on water consumption and wastewater discharge, particularly in commercial and industrial properties. Buildings with inefficient water systems may face compliance issues.
• Waste Management Policies: Regulations around construction and demolition waste, as well as operational waste segregation and recycling, are becoming more prevalent. Properties not designed for efficient waste management or those using non-recyclable materials face challenges.
• Embodied Carbon Disclosure: Beyond operational emissions, there is a growing focus on the embodied carbon of building materials and construction processes. Future regulations may require disclosure or set limits on embodied carbon, impacting the value of properties built with high-carbon materials.

Identifying risk requires not just current compliance checks but a forward-looking analysis of proposed legislation and anticipated tightening of standards over the property’s lifecycle. A property might be compliant today but risk stranding within five to ten years due to foreseeable regulatory shifts.

3.2 Evolving Market Demand and Tenant Preferences

Shifts in tenant preferences and investor expectations towards sustainable, healthy, and energy-efficient buildings exert immense pressure on older, less efficient properties. This leads to decreased demand, higher vacancy rates, and potential obsolescence. Key aspects of this market shift include:

• Tenant Expectations: Modern tenants, especially corporate occupiers, are increasingly prioritizing buildings with strong ESG credentials. They seek healthy indoor environments (e.g., good air quality, natural light), access to green spaces, and amenities that support employee well-being. Green building certifications (LEED, BREEAM, WELL, DGNB) are no longer niche but often a prerequisite for attracting premium tenants. Companies are also driven by their own corporate sustainability goals and the need to report on Scope 3 emissions (including leased assets).
• Investor Mandates: Institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds, and pension funds are incorporating ESG factors into their investment strategies at an accelerating pace. They are increasingly divesting from assets deemed high-carbon or climate-vulnerable (‘brown assets’) and channeling capital towards ‘green assets’. This creates a liquidity crunch and valuation discounts for at-risk properties.
• Generational Shifts: Younger generations entering the workforce and rental market demonstrate a strong preference for sustainable living and working spaces, further solidifying the demand for green buildings.
• Financial Performance Correlation: Studies increasingly demonstrate a ‘green premium’ for certified buildings, characterized by higher occupancy rates, better rental yields, and superior sales prices, while non-certified or underperforming assets face a ‘brown discount’ (GRESB, 2017).

3.3 Technological Advancements and Innovation

Buildings lacking modern technologies or failing to integrate emerging innovations may become less competitive and financially less attractive in the market. This extends beyond simple energy efficiency to a broader embrace of smart building paradigms:

• Smart Building Systems: Integration of Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, artificial intelligence (AI) for predictive maintenance, intelligent building management systems (BMS), and automated climate control systems are becoming standard. These technologies optimize energy consumption, enhance occupant comfort, and provide valuable data for operational efficiency. Buildings without such systems face higher operational costs and lower appeal.
• Renewable Energy Integration: On-site renewable energy generation (e.g., rooftop solar PV, geothermal systems) significantly reduces reliance on grid electricity and lowers operational carbon footprints. Properties designed to be ‘grid-interactive’ or ‘energy positive’ will command a premium.
• Advanced Materials and Construction: Innovations in low-carbon materials, modular construction, and circular economy principles in design and construction are transforming the sector. Buildings constructed with outdated, high-carbon materials or conventional linear approaches may face future reputational or regulatory challenges related to embodied carbon.
• Connectivity and Digital Infrastructure: High-speed internet, 5G readiness, and robust digital infrastructure are essential for modern businesses and residents. Properties with inadequate connectivity will struggle to attract tenants.

3.4 Physical Climate Risk Exposure

Beyond transition risks, the direct physical impacts of climate change are a potent and growing driver of stranding. Assessing a property’s vulnerability to acute and chronic physical risks is paramount:

• Flood Risk: Properties located in floodplains, coastal zones susceptible to sea-level rise, or urban areas with insufficient drainage infrastructure face immediate and long-term risks. Frequent flooding can lead to structural damage, business interruption, increased insurance costs, and ultimately, uninsurability.
• Heat Stress and Drought: Buildings in regions experiencing prolonged and intense heatwaves face higher cooling costs, potential stress on infrastructure, and impacts on occupant health and productivity. Drought can impact water supply reliability and increase water costs, especially for properties with extensive landscaping or water-intensive operations.
• Wildfire Risk: Properties in or near wildland-urban interfaces are increasingly exposed to wildfire risk, leading to damage, air quality issues, and higher insurance premiums.
• Geological Hazards: Changes in precipitation patterns or land use can exacerbate risks from landslides or soil erosion. Rising temperatures can also lead to permafrost thaw in certain regions, impacting foundational stability.

Robust risk assessment requires detailed climate modeling, geographical mapping, and forward-looking scenario analysis to understand the probable impacts over the asset’s expected lifespan. This also necessitates careful consideration of the ‘interdependency’ of risks, where one physical risk (e.g., extreme rainfall) can exacerbate another (e.g., flooding or landslides).

3.5 Geographical Concentration and Asset Class Specificity

Certain geographical areas and property types are inherently more vulnerable to stranding:

• Location: Properties in coastal cities, flood-prone river basins, or regions reliant on carbon-intensive industries are at higher risk. Similarly, areas with strict upcoming environmental regulations will see faster stranding of non-compliant assets.
• Asset Class: Older commercial office buildings, particularly those in central business districts built to previous standards, are highly vulnerable due to shifts in remote work and tenant demand for modern, flexible, and green spaces (propertychronicle.com; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020s_commercial_real_estate_distress). Similarly, retail assets in declining formats (e.g., large, outdated malls) face stranding from e-commerce shifts and changing consumer habits, compounded by energy inefficiency. Industrial assets, particularly heavy manufacturing facilities, may face stranding from carbon taxes or shifts in supply chain preferences towards more sustainable logistics hubs.

Identifying risk is an ongoing process that requires continuous monitoring of regulatory changes, technological advancements, market sentiment, and climate science, integrated into a holistic asset management strategy.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Financial Implications of Stranded Assets

The financial impact of stranded assets extends far beyond simple devaluation, permeating various aspects of a property’s financial performance and posing systemic risks to real estate portfolios and financial institutions. The implications are multifaceted and can significantly erode investment returns and increase liabilities.

4.1 Depreciation and Valuation Adjustments

Properties that cannot meet new environmental standards, market demands, or face high physical risks will experience accelerated depreciation and downward revaluations, often leading to a ‘brown discount’. This impacts valuation methodologies:

• Income Approach (Discounted Cash Flow – DCF): Stranded assets will likely suffer from reduced rental income (lower rents, higher vacancies), increased operational costs (higher energy, maintenance, insurance), and elevated capital expenditure for necessary retrofits. This diminishes net operating income (NOI) and, consequently, future cash flows. The discount rate applied to these cash flows may also increase as investors demand higher returns for perceived greater risk, further eroding present value.
• Sales Comparison Approach: Comparable sales data for non-compliant or high-risk assets will reflect the ‘brown discount’, influencing valuations across similar properties.
• Cost Approach: While the replacement cost might remain high, the economic obsolescence of a stranded asset means its functional utility and ability to generate income are diminished, leading to significant write-downs from its cost base.
• Terminal Value: The long-term residual value of a stranded asset is significantly impaired, often requiring higher capital expenditure assumptions at the end of the holding period to address necessary upgrades or even demolition costs.

This revaluation directly impacts asset balance sheets, potentially leading to impairment charges and reduced shareholder equity for property owners and real estate investment trusts (REITs).

4.2 Reduced Liquidity and Marketability

Stranded assets are inherently harder to sell, lease, or collateralize, leading to a significant reduction in market liquidity. This manifests as:

• Increased Vacancy Rates: Tenants actively avoid properties that are inefficient, unhealthy, or expensive to operate, leading to prolonged vacancy periods and lost rental income.
• Longer Time on Market: The pool of potential buyers or tenants for stranded assets shrinks, resulting in longer marketing periods and increased carrying costs.
• Forced Sales and Discounts: Owners facing regulatory deadlines, high operational costs, or financing pressures may be forced to sell at significant discounts to realize any value, potentially triggering a ‘fire sale’ effect in concentrated markets.
• Impact on Portfolio Diversification: A portfolio heavily weighted with stranded assets loses its diversification benefits, becoming more vulnerable to market downturns and regulatory shifts.

4.3 Increased Operational Costs and Capital Expenditure

Older, non-compliant buildings often incur significantly higher operational and maintenance costs. This includes:

• Higher Energy Costs: Less efficient buildings consume more energy, leading to higher utility bills, especially in an era of rising energy prices and potential carbon taxes.
• Increased Maintenance and Repair: Older systems and infrastructure typically require more frequent and costly repairs.
• Insurance Premiums: Properties exposed to physical climate risks (e.g., flooding, wildfires) face escalating insurance premiums or, in extreme cases, may become uninsurable, transferring the full financial risk to the owner.
• Carbon Taxes and Fines: Regulatory mechanisms like carbon pricing or penalties for non-compliance with energy efficiency standards add direct costs to operations.
• Retrofit Capital Expenditure: Bringing a stranded asset up to modern standards can require substantial capital investment in deep retrofits, which may be economically unviable if the uplift in value or rent does not justify the expense. This represents an unanticipated CapEx burden that erodes profitability.

4.4 Financing Challenges and Capital Availability

Investors and lenders are increasingly integrating ESG factors into their financial decision-making processes, fundamentally altering the availability and cost of capital for real estate projects. This creates significant financing challenges for stranded assets:

• ‘Brown Discount’ in Lending: Financial institutions, driven by regulatory pressure (e.g., stress tests by central banks like the ECB for climate risk exposure), internal ESG commitments, and risk management, are increasingly hesitant to finance properties deemed at high risk of stranding. This leads to a ‘brown discount’ where loans for such assets come with higher interest rates, stricter covenants, lower loan-to-value ratios, or are simply unavailable (lynxenergyandcarbon.co.uk).
• Green Finance Premium: Conversely, ‘green loans’ and ‘sustainability-linked loans’ offer more favorable terms for properties with strong ESG performance or clear decarbonization pathways, creating a competitive disadvantage for stranded assets.
• Refinancing Risk: Existing loans secured by properties at risk of stranding may face challenges during refinancing, potentially leading to higher costs or even default if new financing cannot be secured.
• Impairment of Collateral: For lenders, the devaluation of stranded assets directly impacts the quality of their loan collateral, increasing their exposure to credit risk. This has systemic implications for the financial sector.
• Covenant Breaches: Loan covenants often include clauses related to property performance, occupancy rates, and environmental compliance. Stranding can lead to breaches of these covenants, triggering default clauses or requiring costly renegotiations.

4.5 Broader Economic and Societal Costs

Beyond direct financial implications for asset owners, stranded assets impose broader economic and societal costs:

• Tax Revenue Loss: Devalued properties mean lower property tax revenues for municipalities, impacting public services.
• Job Losses: Redevelopment or demolition of stranded assets can lead to job displacement, while a stagnant real estate market impacts construction and related industries.
• Urban Blight: Large numbers of vacant or underperforming properties can contribute to urban decay and decline in neighborhood vibrancy.
• Social Equity Concerns: The costs of retrofitting or dealing with physical climate risks may disproportionately affect lower-income communities or small property owners, exacerbating social inequalities.

In essence, the financial implications of stranded assets represent a significant drag on economic growth and a potential source of systemic instability, underscoring the urgency of proactive risk management.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Predictive Models for Assessing Stranding Risk

Moving beyond reactive responses, the real estate industry is increasingly adopting sophisticated predictive models and analytical tools to proactively assess and quantify stranding risk. These models integrate vast datasets with future scenarios to provide forward-looking insights, enabling more informed decision-making.

5.1 Comprehensive Data Collection and Integration

The foundation of any robust predictive model is comprehensive and accurate data. This goes beyond traditional property data to include detailed environmental and operational metrics:

• Building Performance Data: Granular data on energy consumption (electricity, gas, heating/cooling), water usage, waste generation, and indoor air quality. This often requires smart metering, Building Management Systems (BMS) data, and IoT sensor integration.
• Architectural and Engineering Data: Detailed specifications of building fabric (insulation, windows), HVAC systems, lighting, and material compositions to estimate current performance and potential for upgrades.
• Regulatory and Policy Data: Up-to-date information on current energy codes, carbon emission targets, minimum energy performance standards (MEPS), and anticipated regulatory changes at local, national, and supra-national levels.
• Market Data: Rental rates, vacancy rates, sales prices, tenant preferences (e.g., demand for certified green space), and investor sentiment for various asset classes and locations.
• Climate Data: Historical weather patterns, projected future climate scenarios (temperature changes, precipitation shifts, extreme weather event frequency/intensity), and localized physical risk assessments (flood maps, wildfire risk zones, sea-level rise projections).
• Occupant Data: anonymized data on occupant density, comfort levels, and energy use behavior can provide insights into operational efficiency and demand patterns.
• Financial Data: Operational costs (energy bills, maintenance), capital expenditure (retrofits), insurance premiums, and property taxes.

The challenge lies not only in collecting this disparate data but also in integrating it into a cohesive platform for analysis, often leveraging data lakes, cloud computing, and advanced analytics.

5.2 Scenario Analysis and Stress Testing

Predictive models must account for the inherent uncertainties of future climate conditions, policy changes, and market shifts. Scenario analysis is a crucial technique for exploring a range of plausible futures:

• Climate Scenarios: Utilizing established climate change scenarios, such as those developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – e.g., Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) or Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) – to model physical risks. This involves translating global climate models into localized impacts on temperature, rainfall, and extreme weather events.
• Policy Scenarios: Modeling the impact of different policy trajectories, ranging from ‘business as usual’ (minimal new regulation) to ‘aggressive decarbonization’ (strict carbon pricing, rapid phase-out of fossil fuels, stringent energy mandates). This helps assess the ‘regulatory cliff’ risk.
• Market Scenarios: Projecting changes in tenant demand (e.g., faster adoption of green leases), investor preferences, technology adoption rates, and shifts in specific asset class performance.
• Financial Stress Testing: Applying these scenarios to financial models (e.g., DCF) to determine the potential impact on property valuations, cash flows, and debt service coverage ratios. This allows investors to quantify potential value at risk (VaR) under different future conditions.
• Sensitivity Analysis and Monte Carlo Simulations: Identifying which variables (e.g., energy price increases, retrofit costs, carbon taxes) have the greatest impact on asset value and using probabilistic simulations to understand the range of potential outcomes.

5.3 Risk Assessment Tools and Methodologies

Several specialized tools and methodologies have emerged to assist in assessing stranding risk, providing standardized frameworks for evaluation:

• Carbon Risk Real Estate Monitor (CRREM): CRREM is a leading initiative that provides science-based decarbonization pathways for different real estate asset types and geographies, aligned with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C and 2°C warming targets. It enables property owners to model their assets’ carbon performance against these pathways, identify properties at risk of ‘carbon stranding’ (i.e., exceeding their carbon budget), and quantify the financial implications of necessary retrofits to meet targets. CRREM acts as a transition risk stress testing tool, helping investors understand the potential value erosion of non-compliant assets (lynxenergyandcarbon.co.uk).
• GRESB (Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark): While not a predictive model in itself, GRESB assesses and benchmarks the ESG performance of real estate portfolios and assets globally. Its detailed framework provides metrics on energy, water, waste, green building certifications, and climate risk management. High GRESB scores indicate better ESG performance and lower stranding risk, making it a critical tool for institutional investors in due diligence and portfolio optimization (GRESB, 2017).
• TCFD Reporting Framework: Although a disclosure framework, TCFD encourages companies to analyze and report on their climate-related risks and opportunities across governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics/targets. Implementing TCFD requires robust internal modeling capabilities to assess physical and transition risks to real estate assets.
• Proprietary Models and Platforms: Many large real estate firms, consultancies, and specialized tech companies are developing their own sophisticated platforms. These often integrate granular property data, climate models, and financial valuation engines to provide bespoke stranding risk assessments. Examples include platforms that use machine learning to predict energy consumption, assess retrofit potential, or map physical risks with high resolution.
• Physical Risk Mapping and Analytics: Specialized platforms (e.g., RMS, Moody’s ESG Solutions, Four Twenty Seven) provide detailed mapping and quantification of specific physical risks (flood, wildfire, heat stress) at the asset level, allowing investors to understand their exposure and potential financial impacts.
• Lifecycle Assessment (LCA) Tools: While primarily used for embodied carbon assessment, LCA tools can help identify properties with high embodied carbon footprints that might be at risk of future devaluation due to carbon intensity regulations or market preferences.

By leveraging these models and tools, real estate stakeholders can gain a quantitative understanding of their portfolio’s exposure to stranding risk, identify priority assets for intervention, and integrate climate risk considerations into core investment and asset management decisions.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Strategic Mitigation Measures

Mitigating the risk of asset stranding requires a proactive, strategic, and holistic approach that integrates sustainability considerations across the entire real estate value chain, from acquisition and development to asset management and divestment. These measures not only safeguard investments but also unlock new opportunities for value creation.

6.1 Proactive Upgrades and Deep Retrofits

Investing in timely and strategic upgrades, particularly deep retrofits, is perhaps the most direct way to de-risk assets. This involves enhancing energy efficiency, integrating sustainable technologies, and improving overall building performance to meet or exceed current and future standards:

• Energy Efficiency Enhancements: This includes upgrading building envelopes (insulation, high-performance windows, efficient roofing), modernizing HVAC systems (e.g., heat pumps, variable refrigerant flow (VRF) systems), installing smart lighting controls (LEDs with occupancy sensors), and optimizing building management systems (BMS) for energy performance. Deep retrofits aim for substantial energy reductions (e.g., 50% or more) and often target specific energy performance ratings (e.g., achieving an ‘A’ EPC rating).
• Renewable Energy Integration: On-site renewable energy generation, such as rooftop solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, geothermal heating and cooling, or integration with district heating networks, can significantly reduce operational carbon emissions and energy costs. Exploring power purchase agreements (PPAs) for off-site renewables is also a viable strategy.
• Water Efficiency Measures: Installing low-flow fixtures, smart irrigation systems, rainwater harvesting, and greywater recycling systems can reduce water consumption and mitigate risks associated with water scarcity.
• Material Selection and Circularity: For significant renovations, opting for low-carbon, recycled, or rapidly renewable materials reduces embodied carbon. Adopting circular economy principles, such as designing for deconstruction and reuse, can enhance long-term value.
• Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ): Upgrades should also focus on improving IEQ, including enhanced ventilation, air filtration, thermal comfort, acoustic performance, and access to natural light, to meet tenant demands for healthy spaces and support certifications like WELL or Fitwel.

Such upgrades require careful cost-benefit analysis, considering the payback period, potential for rental uplift, reduction in operational costs, and avoided stranding risk. Phased retrofits can distribute costs over time, making them more manageable.

6.2 Portfolio Diversification and Risk Management

Strategic diversification of a real estate portfolio can significantly reduce overall exposure to stranding risk:

• Diversification by Asset Class: Balancing investments across various property types (e.g., residential, logistics, data centers, healthcare, offices) can mitigate risks specific to one sector, such as the current challenges faced by older office or retail assets.
• Geographical Diversification: Spreading investments across different regions, countries, and climates can mitigate exposure to localized physical climate risks (e.g., flood plains) or stringent regional regulations. However, this must be balanced with understanding global regulatory trends.
• ESG Risk Profile Diversification: Actively managing the ‘carbon intensity’ and climate risk profile of the portfolio. This involves divesting from high-risk, carbon-intensive ‘brown assets’ and re-investing in ‘green assets’ with strong ESG performance or clear decarbonization pathways. A comprehensive portfolio-level CRREM assessment is crucial here.
• Tenant Mix Diversification: Ensuring a healthy mix of tenants with varying lease terms and industry exposures can reduce vulnerability to single tenant defaults or industry-specific downturns.

6.3 Proactive Stakeholder Engagement and Collaboration

Effective engagement with a broad range of stakeholders is crucial for anticipating changes, aligning strategies, and creating shared value:

• Tenant Collaboration: Implementing ‘green leases’ that formalize sustainability goals, data sharing (e.g., energy consumption), and collaborative efforts to improve building performance. Engaging tenants in the design and operation of sustainable spaces fosters loyalty and ensures demand alignment.
• Regulatory Advocacy: Participating in industry associations and engaging with policymakers to help shape future regulations in a pragmatic and economically viable manner. Understanding forthcoming regulations allows for proactive planning rather than reactive scrambling.
• Supply Chain Engagement: Collaborating with contractors, suppliers, and service providers to ensure sustainable practices, responsible sourcing of materials, and transparent reporting on environmental impacts throughout the project lifecycle.
• Lender and Investor Relations: Maintaining open dialogue with financial partners about ESG strategies, climate risk assessments, and decarbonization plans. Transparent reporting can facilitate access to green finance and improve loan terms.
• Community Engagement: For new developments or major renovations, engaging with local communities builds trust, addresses social impacts, and can help secure necessary permits and public support.

6.4 Long-Term Planning and ESG Integration

Embedding ESG considerations into core business strategy and decision-making processes is paramount for long-term viability:

• ESG Strategy Development: Articulating a clear, measurable ESG strategy with specific targets (e.g., Net Zero pathways, waste reduction goals, social impact metrics) and integrating it into corporate governance.
• Due Diligence Enhancement: Expanding due diligence processes to thoroughly assess environmental risks (physical and transition), social impacts, and governance structures for potential acquisitions. This includes comprehensive climate risk assessments and energy performance evaluations.
• Lifecycle Assessment (LCA): Conducting whole-life carbon assessments for new developments and major retrofits to understand and minimize both embodied and operational carbon emissions across the entire lifecycle of a building.
• Digital Transformation: Investing in data platforms and analytics capabilities to continuously monitor building performance, track ESG metrics, and inform strategic decisions.
• Resilience Planning: Incorporating climate resilience measures into design and operations, such as enhanced stormwater management, robust building materials for extreme weather, and backup power systems, to protect against physical risks.

6.5 Repurposing and Redevelopment Strategies

For assets that are already significantly stranded or have a high risk of future stranding where deep retrofits are economically unviable, alternative strategies are required:

• Adaptive Reuse/Repurposing: Converting existing buildings to new, more viable uses (e.g., converting obsolete office blocks into residential apartments, hotels, or mixed-use developments; repurposing retail malls into last-mile logistics hubs, community centers, or healthcare facilities). This minimizes demolition waste and preserves embodied carbon.
• Redevelopment: In cases where adaptive reuse is not feasible, strategic demolition and redevelopment of the site with a new, highly sustainable, and resilient building might be the optimal solution. This requires careful consideration of demolition waste management and the use of low-carbon construction materials.
• Brownfield Regeneration: Transforming previously developed, often contaminated, urban sites (brownfields) into new, sustainable communities or commercial spaces. This can create significant value and contribute to urban renewal.

By embracing sustainability as a core principle and integrating proactive risk management throughout their operations, real estate stakeholders can transform the challenge of stranded assets into a powerful catalyst for innovation, value creation, and the development of a truly sustainable and resilient built environment.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Conclusion

The phenomenon of stranded assets represents one of the most significant and rapidly evolving challenges facing the global real estate sector today. Driven by the confluence of escalating physical climate risks and the imperative of a swift transition to a low-carbon economy – manifested through stringent regulations, shifting market demands, and technological advancements – properties failing to adapt face premature devaluation, increased operational costs, and severe liquidity constraints. The financial implications are profound, extending from impaired valuations and reduced marketability to increased financing difficulties and systemic risks for lenders and investors. This necessitates a fundamental re-evaluation of traditional real estate investment and asset management paradigms.

However, the risks associated with stranded assets are not insurmountable. Through the adoption of advanced predictive models, such as CRREM, and comprehensive data analytics, stakeholders can proactively identify vulnerable assets and quantify their exposure to stranding. This intelligence forms the bedrock for developing robust strategic mitigation measures. These include ambitious proactive upgrades and deep retrofits to enhance energy efficiency and integrate sustainable technologies; intelligent portfolio diversification to spread risk; proactive engagement with tenants, regulators, and supply chains; and the embedding of long-term ESG considerations into every facet of real estate planning and management. For assets beyond viable retrofitting, innovative repurposing and redevelopment strategies offer pathways to unlock latent value and contribute to urban regeneration.

Ultimately, navigating the evolving landscape of stranded assets transcends mere risk management; it presents a compelling opportunity for value creation and leadership. Those who embrace sustainability, integrate climate risk into their core strategies, and commit to proactive management will not only safeguard their investments but also contribute meaningfully to the broader societal goal of building a resilient, sustainable, and equitable future. The transition from ‘risk to return,’ as some industry observers suggest, lies in the foresight and decisive action taken today to transform the real estate sector for tomorrow (paul.tech). The era of ‘green premiums’ and ‘brown discounts’ is upon us, making sustainable real estate not just an ethical choice, but an undeniable financial imperative.

Many thanks to our sponsor Focus 360 Energy who helped us prepare this research report.

References

• Deepki. (2024, June 19). Stranded assets are a ticking time bomb for European CRE. Retrieved from https://realassetinsight.com/2024/06/19/stranded-assets-are-a-ticking-time-bomb-for-european-cre/
• GMS. (2023). What are stranded assets in real estate? Retrieved from https://www.gms-mediaservices.de/en/news-2023/what-are-stranded-assets/
• Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. (2022, July 27). What are stranded assets? Retrieved from https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-are-stranded-assets/
• GRESB. (2017, January 23). Addressing stranded asset risk in real estate investment. Retrieved from https://www.gresb.com/nl-en/addressing-stranded-asset-risk-in-real-estate-investment/
• LYNX Energy and Carbon Assessors. (2024, November 6). Stranded Assets and Climate Compliance: How CRREM can help with Property Investment. Retrieved from https://lynxenergyandcarbon.co.uk/2024/11/06/stranded-assets-and-climate-compliance-how-crrem-can-help-with-property-investment/
• Matheson. (n.d.). Stranded Real Estate – A Real Possibility. Retrieved from https://www.matheson.com/insights/stranded-real-estate-a-real-possibility/
• PAUL Tech DE. (2025, February 27). Stranded Assets – From Risk to Return. Retrieved from https://www.paul.tech/en/news-insights/stranded-assets-from-risk-to-return
• Property Chronicle. (2023, July 31). The gathering stranded asset storm in commercial real estate. Retrieved from https://www.propertychronicle.com/the-gathering-stranded-asset-storm-in-commercial-real-estate/
• Terabee. (n.d.). Net-Zero Buildings: A Risk for Real Estate? Retrieved from https://www.terabee.com/net-zero-buildings-and-real-estate-risk/
• Wikipedia. (2025, June 5). 2020s commercial real estate distress. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020s_commercial_real_estate_distress